Reading notes, questions, and summaries

Preface: Learning is not about how many books you read, how many summaries you write, or how many excerpts you copy, but whether you truly understand what you’ve read, whether you’ve genuinely learned the knowledge, and whether you apply it. It’s like a swamp—“when encountering a theoretical problem you don’t understand, buy a theoretical book to study.” Previously, I saw Han Yue’s “Study Plan” and became obsessed, so I copied the style and made a reading plan, boasting about how many books I would read. As a result, I only made a little progress because life fell into chaos (no plan, no clear direction), often secretly watching several hours of videos and thinking “it’s not a big deal,” indulging in low-level hobbies, and my studies stagnated. This laid the groundwork for the revival of bourgeois ideology.

Here is my reading plan:

  • “On Contradiction” and “On Practice” (finish the outline and notes within two weeks, try to convert to electronic version)
  • “Introduction to Political Economy” and “Brief World History (Modern Part)” (until the holiday, first chapter of the introduction, the first two or three chapters of world history)
  • Add “Outline of Marxist Philosophy” during the winter vacation
  • Other books:
    • “Mother” (electronic version, Life Machine)
    • “The Crab Factory Ship” (1973, paper copy)
    • “How Steel Was Tempered” (special edition)
    • “Lenin Biography” (“theft” edition)
    • “Childhood,” “In the World,” “My University” (to be purchased, Liu Liaoyi translation)

@Swamp Soldier Do you have other revolutionary book recommendations? Although these are enough for me to read for a while, I hope to have more paper books. E-books are too tiring to read.

不要看特色版,里面掺了资产阶级恋爱和色情内容毒草,删去了讲阶级斗争的部分,还污蔑保尔是托派。

3 Likes

Yes, you can buy the 1976 edition. The preface analyzes Paul as a continuing revolutionary fighter from the perspective of class struggle, and that preface is also very good.

1 Like

I don’t remember having said that sentence.
Regarding the number of readings, the amount you currently have is already enough. Focus on the main contradictions; at school, within the limited time, you can at most read two books simultaneously—one on theory and one on literature. It’s not purely a technical issue; the key is to grasp the main contradictions.
If you still want other books, bring them to school to read. You can first find electronic versions, and if needed, purchase used books when it’s safe, such as from Old Book Network or similar sites. Regarding reading lists, I recommend some revolutionary biographies, memoirs, and novels: “Prisoner’s Diary and Letters,” “Memories of Lenin,” “Lenin’s Memoirs,” “The Story of Zoya and Shura,” “Young Guard,”

3 Likes

Small-scale conspiracy activities are doomed to fail, so revolution should be a combination of openness and secrecy. The Party needs to make decisions based on the situation and needs about what should be prioritized.
Why is it said that Napoleon’s adoption of “family rule” paved the way for feudal restoration? Is it because he adopted bloodline enfeoffment to approach feudal monarchs?
As soon as Zhong Xiu Yi came to power, he adopted fascist dictatorship, carried out mass slaughter, arrests, and purges of revolutionaries, sabotaged the international communist movement, colluded with American imperialists to invade Vietnam, and attempted to completely erase the influence of socialism. He released bourgeois mouthpieces to loudly proclaim “Communism has failed” and “the revolution is over,” but history has not regressed; it has only entered a new stage. The development of the people’s war in Peru is the best response to the rhetoric of bourgeois intellectuals, isn’t it?
Online petty bourgeois rightists often joke about Poland as “hell,” claiming that a great nation was repeatedly dismembered and lost independence, calling it “completely Poland,” openly slandering that the Soviet Union fabricated the “Katyn Massacre” (in fact, it was Nazi Germany slaughtering Polish people), and participating in the “partition of Poland” (actually a just action to recover Western Belarus and Western Ukraine). These people are able to recklessly make vulgar jokes about people’s suffering and insult socialism because they are comfortably occupying others’ labor—parasites. Different workers “eat, live, and work together,” yet they indulge in material pleasures, speculative studies, and are addicted to spiritual opium, unable to extricate themselves. Their idealist worldview sees everything except themselves as existing for their pleasure, so they naturally treat everything else as toys for their enjoyment. Zhong Xiu Yi’s attitude towards such “allies” is naturally to turn a blind eye, allowing them to spread spiritual opium, anti-Xiu theories, and vulgar popular science.
@jqr Jqr, isn’t this behavior a typical case of “crying but not correcting”? Jqr should reflect on why he has fallen to this point. Initially, he sent things back to his hometown, then started listening to virtual singers, and gradually reduced his self-criticism. I heard that sometimes he doesn’t even attend reading clubs anymore, and not long ago, he even started listening to gay men. Although previously Jqr could refute some anti-Mao remarks, like what was said on May Day that “Jqr is two different people for himself and others,” if Jqr continues to cling to parasitic life, the revolutionary spirit will eventually be completely lost!
I am now living a parasitic life. The reason I escaped from revolutionary life and fell into a decadent petty bourgeois life was because of my environment, which was oppressed. Through ideological struggle, revolutionary factors have overcome counter-revolutionary ones, allowing me to still lean towards revolution. But if I become complacent and do not actively engage in ideological struggle (changing living conditions, criticizing non-proletarian ideas, strengthening theoretical learning, making plans for Confucian parents, bourgeois academic institutions, and myself), it will strengthen counter-revolutionary factors and turn me into a bourgeois or a traitor like a city management officer.
Currently, the bourgeoisie is hyping Napoleon’s imperialist wars, praising him excessively and erasing class nature. However, through studying this section, I understand that Napoleon’s military theories were actually learned from revolutionary armies. But because he represented the interests of the big bourgeoisie, brutally oppressed the people, and turned them into cannon fodder for invasion and expansion, many of his subsequent military actions faced strong resistance from people of various countries. The armies of feudal lords across Europe were just there to pick peaches.

Actually, I’ve been listening for a long time.

It’s not that they sometimes don’t come, they basically never come.

I don’t remember anyone saying that. It’s probably you who paraphrased one of my sentences.

1 Like

Yes, the Katyn massacre was actually carried out by the Nazis. The cartridge casings found in the bodies were identified as German-made. On May 8, 1943, Goebbels wrote: “Unfortunately, German ammunition was found in the graves at Katyn… This incident must be kept strictly secret. Once it falls into enemy hands, the entire Katyn affair will have to be completely covered up.” The reasons are also quite clear: at that time, the Nazis suffered a crushing defeat at the Battle of Stalingrad and urgently needed to sow discord within the Anti-Fascist Alliance (especially between the Polish exile government and the Soviet Union). The reactionary articles and posts domestically that heavily promoted the “Soviet guilt theory” were also evidently with ulterior motives.

Some of the discovered bullet manufacturing dates are even earlier than 1941.

《A Concise World History》4-1

Why are utopian socialists able to “reflect the initial, unclear desires of the proletariat that was just beginning to form at the time”?
Even among the working class, if there is no ideological struggle and the toxic influence of the bourgeoisie and petty bourgeoisie is allowed to spread freely, it will be difficult to achieve victory in the struggle, and even after failure, the organization may be shattered.
The lack of revolutionary theory in Blanqui’s approach led him to fail to grasp scientific class analysis methods, so he could not understand the proletariat’s historical mission. This was reflected in practical struggle as adopting the method of “a few conspiring to incite rebellion,” without mobilizing the masses. Naturally, this cannot defeat the ruling class. Revolution is a mass movement, a mass cause, and such closed-door approaches are fundamentally wrong.
When I study revolutionary theory, I cannot do it “just for the sake of studying,” “to get by,” or to engage in revolutionary opportunism. Doing so only results in seeing Marxism superficially, while actually learning revisionism (and during the learning process, also fighting against non-proletarian ideas). Comrade Screwdriver said it well @Screwdriver

I used to be afraid of labor too. After graduating from college, I even thought about turning my so-called education into a means of mental labor, becoming a skilled worker. But the broad masses of workers are living in completely different environments from mine, with no time or energy to read, learn, or even enjoy the labor of others, as they have relied on their own labor to survive since childhood. Of course, we oppose excessive labor, but this is caused by capitalist society. Therefore, our labor is based on the need to change ourselves and transform society, which provides the continuous motivation to persevere. Great energy comes from great goals; there should be a target. If even the most basic act of living through labor is refused, how can there be talk of the great communist ideals?

Before reading revolutionary books, one should think carefully about why they are reading—this is an important class position issue and cannot be taken lightly.
Social reformists like Starfish and Liu Bai are among the most harmful enemies of today’s communist revolutionary movement. They advocate class reconciliation and oppose the proletarian revolution (that “Red Husky” economic viewpoint is just their mouthpiece—supporting public ownership is false, maintaining private ownership is true, and they fantasize about a speculative resurgence). But capitalist society will inevitably cast them into the ranks of the proletariat. How could they possibly make a comeback?
The bankruptcy of Liu Bai’s practice and theory, and Starfish’s desperate struggle, only once again prove that social reform is a dead end! To truly achieve liberation, it is not about trying to preserve private ownership at all costs but breaking away from it. This means not only breaking with private property ideas (like the “second dimension” and video games) but also severing relations with private property itself (leaving the bourgeois academic institutions, abandoning the “long gown” far from workers and peasants, and breaking away from old family ties).

2 Likes

You must have quoted incorrectly, these words definitely weren’t spoken by me, because I am only in the third year of junior high school now, taking the high school entrance exam this year, how could I have graduated from college?

That was said by Comrade Hundred-Ton King Semi-Trailer

2 Likes

This is not the left circle celebrity who was sent back home to the elderly last time and was beaten by human traffickers, and even more incredible is that they contacted bureaucratic bourgeoisie to invite them to dinner

Why was Marx a revolutionary democrat when he spent several years in university before engaging in social activism?
Those who advocate that “Marxism is outdated” or that “Marxism is just a religion” should stop right now. The static Marxism in your eyes is actually a science that keeps pace with the times. It was created through the practical struggles of the proletariat and revolutionary intellectuals, and in turn guides the social practice of the proletariat and revolutionary intellectuals.
From the lyric “To create human happiness, it all depends on us” on page 191, we can see the difference between proletarian art and petty-bourgeois art.
Revolutionary art: the subjectivity of the proletariat; historical mission; combat call; view of truth; view of sacrifice; closely related to current struggles (reflection of the proletarian worldview).
Petty-bourgeois art with bourgeois tendencies: repetitive slogans; rhetorical embellishments; pessimism; personal heroism (petty-bourgeois worldview).
From page 195, every real struggle is also a struggle with one’s old thoughts. The struggle with Confucian parents should not be limited to just finishing the fight; one should promptly summarize the situation, reflect on problems, and root out backward thoughts, rather than indulge in pleasure (using “relaxation” as an excuse). This will only lead to failure in the struggle.

Marx and Engels fought for the establishment of the proletarian party.
Why was it not possible to organize a Communist Party within a single country at that time? Was it because the political and economic development of different countries was unbalanced, or for other reasons?
K. G. Gall’s “The Poor” should refer to bankrupt petty bourgeoisie, because after being squeezed out of bankruptcy by the bourgeoisie, the petty bourgeoisie was forced to join the ranks of the proletariat, seemingly becoming workers, but in reality, they are “body in the camp, heart in Han,” still nostalgic for their small private property, feeling that losing private property is like “the sky falling,” and instead of fighting private ownership ideas, they try to get it through speculative revolution in every possible way.
In the face of the light of revolution and communism, all enemies of the proletariat will reveal their true nature.

What is the difference between financial aristocrats and financial capitalists? And what is their connection?

Why does the “Bonapartist dictatorship… of rule” make France one of the reactionary strongholds in Europe? How does bourgeois democratic reform compare to Bonapartist dictatorship in terms of progress? Is it not the case that the dictatorship of the entire bourgeoisie is more progressive than the dictatorship of part of the bourgeoisie?

Reasons for the theft of the February Revolution’s fruits:

  1. Deception of the bourgeoisie’s fake revolution
  2. Lack of revolutionary theory guidance
  3. Influence of petty bourgeois fallacies (Louis Blanc’s “unity of opposites” theory)

Good question. I am not very clear about the issue of financial aristocrats, but it is definitely a different nature from the definition of financial capitalists. Financial capitalists are a product of the imperialist era, resulting from the combination of industrial capital and credit capital. At that time, the French financial aristocrats still hindered the continued development of capitalism and were in conflict with the industrial and commercial bourgeoisie.


First of all, Marx was not immersed in university; during that period, he was completely isolated from social activities. In university, many of his courses were very passive and tedious:


The statement about Fo Tan contains an assumption, implying that Marx was always detached from society during university and only later engaged with it. In fact, this is not true; not only was he passive about courses in university, but Marx was also actively involved in the German Young Hegelian clubs and political groups at that time, engaging with class struggle.

6 Likes

Today I didn’t write my reading notes in order to rest early, so I am sharing some of the better reading notes I made during the winter vacation.

The working class needs to organize into an independent political party to act as a class; spontaneous workers’ movements can only reach syndicalism because spontaneous movements are of capitalist nature, essentially not opposing capitalist society but merely demanding to change their own status.

The contradiction between China’s semi-colonialism and imperialism, and the contradiction between semi-feudal society and feudalism are actually the same contradiction, because the latter is actually an agent of the former — in rural areas, large landlords; in cities, large comprador (bureaucratic capital). Different imperialist powers have different agents in China, and the remnants of feudalism allow rural areas to be independent of cities. The uneven political and economic development across regions has led to warlord fragmentation and continuous warfare, which also creates conditions for armed peasant and worker uprisings.

Imperialist invasion on one hand destroys certain feudal production relations; on the other hand, it turns China from an independent country into a semi-colony.

Old democratic revolution

Although national capitalism has developed somewhat, feudal production relations and feudal land ownership still form the basis of society.

The struggle of the masses

The Taiping Heavenly Kingdom movement: lacked proletarian party leadership, lacked advanced worldview and theoretical guidance.

Bourgeois democratic revolution: these emerging bourgeoisie are still closely linked with the old feudal forces and are also exploitative classes, making it impossible for them to carry the democratic revolution to the end. Even the most radical bourgeois far-left and petty-bourgeois united dictatorship — the Jacobin democratic dictatorship — collapsed after only a year.

The revolution urgently needs new forces; the proletariat has undertaken this historical task.

Advantages of China’s proletariat: appeared earlier than the national bourgeoisie; originated from peasants, conducive to the worker-peasant alliance; oppressed and exploited most deeply by the three mountains (imperialism, feudalism, and bureaucratic capitalism), with no means of production; without private property, which is a burden.

Question: Why does the working class lack an economic foundation for reformism?

Communist ideas can only be instilled from outside; spontaneous struggles cannot form a communist ideological system, and can only reach syndicalism at most.

“How to Proceed?” and the Chinese revolutionary movement

The revolutionary spirit of students comes from oppression; apart from a few opportunists who treat knowledge as capital, there are unrealistic fantasies in schools: immediately becoming bourgeois or their lackeys after graduation.

Intellectuals with communist ideals contrast with today’s students in China (parasitic, detached from practice, obsessed with opportunistic studies, indulging in spiritual opium) and previous students (working while studying, economically independent, relying on subsidies but still concerned with the revolution).

The May Fourth Movement erupted, students protested in the streets and were suppressed, while the working class launched a general political strike forcing the Beiyang government to yield. Moreover, the May Fourth Movement was a great ideological and cultural movement, fiercely attacking old morals and literature, and vigorously promoting new culture and new morals.

After the May Fourth Movement, communist intellectuals turned towards the path of integrating with the workers and peasants (dividing into revolutionary, non-revolutionary, or counter-revolutionary intellectuals).

Chairman Mao led students in patriotic anti-imperialist movements and published “The Great United Front of the People.”

The so-called new policy is to rescue the bureaucratic monopoly bourgeoisie, but instead it strengthens the control of the monopoly bourgeoisie, taking advantage of the bankruptcy of many petty bourgeoisie to strengthen monopolies. The continuous outbreaks of economic crises accelerated fascism in Germany, Italy, and Japan, and the appeasement policies of Britain and France.

The more severe the economic crisis, the weaker the bourgeoisie; the weaker the bourgeoisie, the more reactionary it becomes. Economic crises inevitably lead to political crises, and they are also periods when monopoly capital strengthens its monopolies.

Classes become increasingly reactionary, and politics and culture will be equally reactionary.

4 Likes

How to distinguish between conspiratorial activities and public activities?
Why did Marx and Engels oppose “organizing so-called ‘revolutionary volunteer armies’ from abroad to march into Germany”? Would doing so give feudal monarchists an excuse to attack the revolution?
What is the difference between “wing” and “faction”? When should you use “wing” and when should you use “faction”?
Why did the Prussian government not directly ban the “Neue Rheinische Zeitung” but later only “order it to cease publication”?
We should use all (appropriate) means to counter the influence of Confucian parents and the bourgeois academic institutions, rather than hurting ourselves to force them to make concessions. We should let them also “suffer” and let them know we are not easy to deal with. Otherwise, they will only get more arrogant, push us into a dead end, and let us sway along their set track in long-term suffering.
“Passive resistance should be backed by active resistance,” we should not wait until Confucian parents attack to start defending. We should oppress and struggle regularly, and sometimes even “strike proactively” to turn the tables, not act as slaves—slaves’ first reaction to oppression is not resistance but kneeling, and they also pull others to kneel with them. Not only do they fail to fight back, but they also spread defeatist talk like “this is inappropriate,” “this is too radical, leave some face,” “is this feasible? Can it succeed?” or even directly become traitors or spies.
The vast majority of farmers are revolutionary and will stand with the proletariat in the revolution. What kind of people are the “peasant friends” online? Do poor farmers have so much time to surf the internet? Do poor and lower-middle peasants attack socialist China by “expanding the contradiction between workers and peasants” or “playing the scissors gap to exploit farmers”? Yet they cause huge damage to agricultural production, watch helplessly as their land is plundered by a small group of new landlords and rich farmers, and happily hand over their grain to revisionist regimes, throwing themselves into bourgeois black factories during the “reform and opening up” (capitalist restoration)?

1 Like

Although bourgeois political economy is nonsense and fallacious, it is produced because the bourgeoisie must compete with other capitalists and must defend their class interests again and again, which leads to the development of political economy theories.
Why can’t the petty bourgeoisie understand political economy? Because the petty bourgeoisie wants history to stop, their own lives to stagnate, so their thinking is also stagnant. Ultimately, petty bourgeois intellectuals are incompetent and can only bow before the bourgeoisie.
Left circle: shout a few Marxist-Leninist slogans to comfort themselves, in order to indulge in wild pleasure and opportunistic revolution, which is actually far from revolution.
Insufficient personal consumption is not due to distribution injustice, but is determined by the relations of production.
Legalist landlords’ reforms are all about usurping the achievements of peasant uprisings, relying on suppressing peasant uprisings to start (for example: the Yellow Turban uprising during the Three Kingdoms). Every reform by Legalists is a more frantic exploitation of peasants.
Middle revision’s capital export:
Congo cobalt blood, a woman’s tragic experience;
“aid” that brings poverty, hunger, and disaster, Angola and the “Middle Revision model,” plundering crude oil, boasting military warlords’ private armies, little Johnny. Gabon, establishing economic zones to plunder forest resources, monopolizing fisheries, frantically seizing fishing resources, and brutally exploiting fishermen; Kenya’s railway plunder.
Mad vampirism: huge loans to control the colonial economy. Middle revision’s Japanese imperialism bids for the Yawan high-speed railway, even quoting higher prices for the suburban section. The petty bourgeoisie’s attitude towards capital export, eager for Middle Revision investment in people’s livelihood, is completely “small scolding big help.” The excess profits seized from the Third World are all used to support Middle Revision’s dogs (worker aristocrats, one hundred million party members).
The Japanese imperialists are also unwilling to be robbed, so they are planning counterattacks. The Tokyo government continues to devalue the yen, and expanding military preparations is preparing for a counterattack.
Middle revision textbooks: “Legalists are being deleted more and more, Confucians are increasing.”
The influence of slave-owning forces in industry and commerce remains strong, which is the reason for the subsequent fierce struggle between Confucianism and Legalism.
Qi State is not weak economically but politically; incomplete political reforms led to the later phenomenon of slave-owning restoration.
Military serves politics: in terms of troop deployment, Middle Revision soldiers compare with Confucian soldiers—lining up for executions and stacking tofu blocks, five-minute meals, beating soldiers… this is useless in actual combat.
The fundamental reason for formalism: emphasizing hierarchy, i.e., obedience and order (rites).
Confucius said, “Teach without discrimination” and “establish private schools” (teaching reactionary slave system with high tuition fees). Benevolence—benevolence within the ruling class; the next level of “rites” towards the ruling class; contrasting with Christianity’s “brotherly love” and Mozi’s small-scale mutual aidism.
Hypocritical Confucianism: scheming, plotting, cunning tricks, not practicing “words must be followed by actions, actions must be fruitful,” saying less and doing less to disguise oneself, and scheming against others.

Mark King: I have no other meaning, alas, I really tend to speak too much and cause trouble.
Ruling slaves materially with carrots and sticks; demanding slaves and commoners to self-discipline and restore rites, themselves “not tired of fine food and delicacies”; in counter-revolutionary theory, also copying the previous slave owners.