
Editor’s note: This is an article about two outstanding proletarian revolutionaries within the Bolshevik Party—Grigory Petrovsky and his son Leonid Petrovsky. Grigory Petrovsky, born into a poor miner’s family, was a seasoned veteran revolutionary within the Bolshevik Party. He was entrusted with significant responsibilities by the Bolshevik Central Committee led by Lenin, leading revolutionary struggles in Ukraine, and participated in the formation of the Cheka after the revolution. During the Russian Civil War, he served as chairman of the Revolutionary Military Committee of the Soviet Ukraine and concurrently as chairman of the Central Executive Committee of Soviet Ukraine until 1938. Under his leadership, Soviet Ukraine flourished, correctly implementing Lenin’s and Stalin’s revolutionary policies, transforming Ukraine from a region oppressed and impoverished under Tsarist rule into a burgeoning socialist Soviet republic, fostering vibrant national cultural development. To commemorate his contributions, Soviet Ukraine renamed the city of Yekaterinoslav to Dnipropetrovsk.
Leonid Petrovsky, the eldest son of Grigory Petrovsky, was deeply influenced from a young age by his father and veteran Bolsheviks engaged in revolutionary activities, cultivating a proletarian revolutionary worldview. Later, Leonid Petrovsky participated bravely in the Russian Civil War. After the war, he was sent to advanced military academies by the Communist Party (Bolsheviks) and rose to high-ranking positions within the Soviet Red Army. In 1941, when Nazi Germany betrayed its pact and invaded the Soviet Union, Leonid Petrovsky, then commander of the 63rd Infantry Army on the front lines, did not flee or defect despite being encircled by German forces. Instead, he fought valiantly, leading a river crossing to ambush the Germans, catching them off guard. Due to his outstanding performance, he was rapidly promoted to commander of the 21st Group Army and ordered to leave the encirclement by plane to Smolensk under the command of the 21st Group Army. However, Leonid Petrovsky refused this order, unable to abandon his troops and leave only himself alive. He chose to stay within the encirclement and lead a breakout with his entire army, leaving the aircraft to the most seriously wounded who needed to evacuate. During the battle, he led by example with heroic revolutionary spirit, fighting to the death. He was tragically shot and killed in the Battle on the Dnieper River and was buried upstream of Dnipropetrovsk.
The heroic deeds of the Petrovsky father and son demonstrate that the source of strength for socialist Soviet Union and the Bolshevik Party lies in the millions of workers like them actively engaged in various positions within the Soviet regime—constantly fighting for the revolution, selflessly dedicating themselves, becoming seemingly small but profoundly meaningful cogs in the revolutionary machinery. This stands as the best rebuttal to those bourgeois elements who spread rumors claiming the Soviet Union was a “totalitarian state” and that the Soviet people were “disloyal” to the Soviet regime—anti-Soviet, anti-Communist, and anti-people pests.
Note: The title was added by the editor. The original text is a response from Zhihu; the material provided is for reference only and does not necessarily reflect the author’s stance.
