井冈山阵线最早是从余同新反动组织领导下的“马学组读书会”脱离出的各个革命小组联合组成的的合作阵线（类似于联盟，在一些活动和工作上有紧密的团结，是联盟和组织的过渡），各小组以互助合作的形式团结在一起，在QQ展开工作，此时的主要工作内容是理论讨论、文章编辑（未成熟，不成规模，无纪律）、开展对外围是教育和对积极分子的培养，在这个时期，井冈山阵线制订了革命纲领和用于规范组织活动的章程。而井冈山阵线主要成分为学生，所以不可避免的有活动性、积极性上的局限。
在引入xmpp后，井冈山阵线得到了大进步，xmpp成为阵线主战场，QQ作为外围继续存在并逐渐被弃用。在这个时期，阵线的工作规范化制度化程度加强，工作保密性加强，出现了外交部、编辑部等工作部门，并指定了相关负责人员，展开了多次动员运动和整风运动，整体上阵线的小资产阶级习气被削弱，阵线与各基层小组的联系由小组代表负责。
通过一次次的危机解决和工作合作，各小组之间建立起了相对坚实的联系，阵线指挥部认为阵线已有转化为更为集中化的组织的条件，于是井冈山由分散的小组合作阵线转化为集中的革命组织。这个阶段中，组织召开了整风会议与动员会，同志们总结了工作经验并提出接下来的工作任务，各部门也召开了相应会议，根据井冈山性质变化制订新的工作目标与工作方法。随着大量原基层小组成员的加入，组织积极性提高，组织工作的民主化程度加强。这个阶段中，原阵线群成为外围群，原贴合紧密的组织并入井冈山（如68小组、执火社等），游离的基层小组仍作为外围存在。
自从进驻xmpp后，我们和两社进行了相对深度合作，比如写作、帮忙建设群众等，不过他们的同志相处和工作的方针是有问题的。
在学生编辑工作群里，这个本该是各个组织并联合作的工作单位，他们一开始便选择了集体写作，不磨合不交换资料的集体写作只有在一方完全服从一方的情况下才能真正的，有顺序的实现，我提出了并联写作和投稿交流合二为一共同进行的方针，并且把实验的未完成稿交了出来，这是完全在革命合作中应该做的，更是是符合自己的合作地位和推进接下来的工作的行为，也是在合理的独立性内的，两社却认为我竟然在剥夺他们的独立性！那么内群对那份不看“实验”二字的稿子进行批判实质上是为了什么呢？他们接下来的行为更是证明了他们的目的：借着踢出所谓无关人员的名义针对踢出我。作为一个革命者，不光明正大的进行交流，搞密谋主义，到底是什么问题呢？从我最开始加入的时候，开始展示作为一个合作组织的代表本应展示的独立性的时候，便证明了我们不是两社附庸的根本地位，同样也有很好的表现。他们首先在对于古斯特的处理问题上，因我拥有独立的、群众处理法而没拥护红花的方法，他当时明明说是想暂时保留古斯特！可我反驳并提出我们的见解的时候，我们就被打成了山头，并再次卖弄独立性等辞藻，更是宣称他们在内部群其实早就准备好了踢出，那么若真是如此，为什么在广泛的同志和各个合作组织面前提出“暂时保留”呢？如果不是如此，为什么又要说内群早已提出踢出古斯特呢？而且，如果在合作中因其他组织有独立性而认为自己失去了本应有的“独立性”，那么这个独立性到底有多大呢？其中又包括了哪些方面甚至组织呢？他们每当内部出现问题的时候便对外部合作的同志进行开刀，之前康平路离开两社，两社慌慌张张的开始了“对外反击”，因我们这种外部合作同志并不绝对听从于他们来获得他们的“信任”，而且他们有成熟的密谋群聊和习惯，便在内部抹黑什么井冈山在进行他们的群众工作中偷偷宣传他们的阵线！在我后续对他们的这些行为在群里公开表示不满和对他们的指控提出质疑的时候，红花便用当老子党来抹黑我们，并且毫无聊天记录依据甚至大体内容都不记得便对我进行批评，批评我干涉他们的工作，并且认为我们当初和云水怒一样站着说话不腰疼的去指责他，去指指点点，可是我当时说话不仅没有一分态度不好，而且并没有说什么，提的主要还都是建议而不是所谓的指指点点！
那么综上所述，难道一个合作的组织拥有独立性就是的剥夺了他们的根本独立性吗？难道一个合作组织拥有独立性包括经常提建议都是在剥夺一个组织的独立性吗？难道这种独立性太过于宽广不是一种对外部合作组织的一种强行压制和控制吗？难道并联性的写作组织不应该有投稿交流等环节吗？如果一个同志一个组织在工作亦或者是合作中能提供优秀的工作能力到底是打压还是吞并还是深度合作呢？进行合作和对群众和同志进行团结和工作应该保持怎样的态度？这些问题，有待两社同志解决亦或者“解答”。而两社同志给的是解决，让我们拭目以待。
最近，我们在xmpp上，和沉默进行了斗争和割裂。在一些工作上因其无集体意识、无政府、个人主义甚至表达和自证有问题等原因，我们拒绝了他的路线。他便对我们进行各种抹黑和辱骂，那么团结在他这里成为了绑架，他的路线成为了一切和他合作的同志的生命线，一旦不符合他的路线和想法便会成为政治黑线人物，比如反革命，不革命。这说到底是一种小资产阶级的、脱离真正革命路线的方法和思想的，用这种小资产阶级的、旧的、从外边带来的唯我独革的习惯来进行一切革命工作注定因其不符合革命的本质而面临被孤立的局面。
What is this you’re saying? It’s unclear and completely leaves people confused about what’s going on. If you’re going to speak, you should at least follow basic rules and clearly state who you are and what you’re here for. Otherwise, sending something completely incomprehensible is meaningless, isn’t it? Moreover, you’re not introducing yourself or stating your purpose, yet treating the forum as a megaphone is also very inappropriate.
We were caught up in public opinion just now and hastily drafted a statement, which is indeed abrupt.
No one has heard of the public opinion wave affecting us all. You should explain things in more detail.
The article on silence mentions, comrades
We certainly welcome people to communicate, but we hope you can make your sources clear and explain the matter clearly.
I really can’t understand what you’re writing about, and I don’t know what you’re here for. And why suddenly there’s a public event with no explanation, nor do I know the purpose of the public event. It must be said that this basically extinguishes any potential willingness to communicate.
Major statement, sincere apologies for the abruptness.
This thing is perplexing. A person doing something always has a purpose, and posting a statement here must also have a purpose, but the entire text does not clarify it and seems like an advertisement. In this piece I cannot understand the names of people or groups, and I am not interested in these factions; I hope you can explain why these were written.
The pronouns in the article are also very mixed: occasionally it uses “we,” but when it comes to the factions, it is almost always “I,” showing that this so-called “group introduction and statement” clearly reads more like an individual piece, making it hard to understand what is being said. The linguistic confusion reflects a confusion of thoughts; the matter is not explained clearly, and even the pronouns are chaotic. In the so-called representative organization’s “statement,” there is a lot of personal content mixed in. This obviously reflects the disorder and lack of discipline within your organization, making many self-praising terms in this article even more questionable in terms of authenticity.
Not to boast, but we rushed this together temporarily due to issues with our student group. We also acknowledged our limitations and realized we were affected, so we came here to say this abruptly. We are very sorry. Comrades can see that we focused on writing about the situation, not the essence. If you have questions, you can add me, and I can find time to answer.
And I myself am referring to this representative.
What you sent is completely unclear and meaningless; no one can understand how your so-called organization develops, what struggles it has gone through, what problems it has faced. These things are entirely incomprehensible. You only abstractly mention “rectification campaign,” petit-bourgeois habits, and limitations in mobilization, but you never explain how these are manifested concretely.
Including all the various matters and people you talk about below, the forum staff and everyone here have never understood or heard of them; it’s really confusing.
The forum itself requires posts to start with a self-introduction, outlining one’s life experiences, changes in political views, and social background, but you completely ignore these rules and regulations. What are you trying to achieve by posting such a careless, ignored statement?
I don’t know what you mean by leaving a contact method, do you want to use the forum’s influence to recruit people? If so, that’s a bit despicable. And the article is full of empty rhetoric, you can’t tell what Marxist organization you are. No program, only factional struggles in history (and you can’t explain it clearly at all), like a bunch of self-talk.
We’re just here to state this matter, and just because we issued this statement, does it mean we use a factional logic to handle all revolutionary things? We may be abrupt, but we’re also responding to public opinion’s reach. If we were prepared to do these things, we wouldn’t post our own account.
Then why did you come to the forum to issue a statement? To be honest, most people on the forum don’t know what organization you are or what activities you are undertaking. What is the purpose of posting this “statement” on the forum?
Honestly, to be honest, I don’t know what you mean by “the spillover,” why you issued this statement, and I don’t even know what you mean by “external public opinion.” Here, at least publicly, no one is active on XMPP. If you want to make any statement, you should speak clearly. Those who previously decided to continue to disengage from the social circle also didn’t mention any “Jinggangshan” student organization; everyone knows nothing about you.
You say it only involves facts and not essence, but the problem is that even the facts aren’t explained clearly. Besides factional fighting, the above article reveals nothing to others. You can’t possibly expect others to understand what facts are here from a pile of texts that say nothing about the organization’s program, how activities are carried out, or how to study Marxist theory, all full of statements about this faction infringing on that faction’s “independence.” And don’t go around repeating statements like a stubborn old man. To be blunt, the petty squabbles between your factions are really boring and no one wants to study them. Leaving this post up as well, is just people showing sincere attitudes; I hope you can also show genuine willingness to engage in dialogue.
From the beginning I saw that your so-called organization has moved from QQ to XMPP, and it gave me a start. Because this small XMPP circle really left me with no good impression; the activities there are watched by traitor dens like “Continuing Revolution Society.” If they are not betraying the people, they probably wouldn’t seclude themselves in such a small circle. From this chaotic article you can tell that these organizations you mention, though they seem to emphasize “line struggle” all day, actually have little practical propaganda and learning activities, and only factional clashes for personal power and ambition. If you treat the forum as a voice platform to suppress another faction, I think the comrades here would not agree, and the long string of text you posted is also boring and reactionary. If you truly have a willingness to communicate, you should follow the forum’s requirements and first write a self-introduction. Ascend in rank and make a fortune elsewhere; do not enter this gate with cowardice and fear of death. Revolutionaries come.
Because we have been swept up by the public opinion of the Hengyang group and the silence faction, we can only temporarily write this statement. We initially provided a brief introduction, and we did not recruit anyone; on the contrary, we are making this declaration.
I still don’t understand the intent behind your statement.