Letting go and some reflections

A few days ago is International Women’s Day on March 8th. I really want to write an article on this forum to commemorate it, but once I write it, I will be accused of being hypocritical; if I don’t write it, that would be even more hypocritical, and I would be seen as not caring about the women’s liberation movement. Of course, if I honestly write these things, I will also be labeled; I have already thought of a name—viewing comrades through bourgeois human nature theory. Perhaps, as comrades have said, I think too highly of myself, but in fact, I have never had such an idea. To be fair, I also have some understanding of historical materialism, since I have studied history for so many years.

A few days ago, I was indeed very angry and confused, but now I have let it go. I believe that even if I am labeled and make mistakes, it does not affect my contribution to communism. Even if comrades have long regarded me as a reactionary. When I first debated, I already said that you seem to want to label me as a reactionary, and now it’s true—no need to pretend anymore.

I have never denied the Anti-Rightist Movement; I have always spoken of its exaggeration. Although Deng Xiaoping was ultimately responsible, it was expanded to 550,000 rightists, and Chairman Mao also said: “Where are so many rightists in the country? At most, 50,000.” The next sentence after you say I “remind comrades” is nonsense; you label me, saying I use bourgeois human nature theory, and then you talk nonsense—doesn’t that also reflect bourgeois human nature theory? You even used the word “emperor.”

I said Comrade Fenghuo is “outstanding” sincerely. I read the drafts of “The Middle Unrest” and some other articles he wrote, and they touched my heart deeply, with strong arguments. Well, here’s another point: claiming that I invented the term “Number One Servant,” implying a hierarchical concept, is just another way of labeling me. The term “Number One Servant” comes from Comrade Yang Daoyuan, the No. 1 Servant of the Steel Second Division of the Wuhan Revolution Rebel Faction, in his “Dedication—My Experience of the Proletarian Cultural Revolution.” It seems that Kuai Dafu from Tsinghua Jinggangshan Corps also used the term “Number One Servant.” Can I also label comrades as “incompetent” based on this? My original intention was to say that in the association, and even the entire forum, Comrade Fenghuo is the leader because most of the articles are drafted by him. Here’s another comparison: I really don’t know how “gentleman” refers to “slave owner.” How do you interpret my words based on that? Isn’t that also a way of saying I’m “incompetent”? I study Chinese language and history, and I only know that “gentleman” refers to “a person with morality and talent.” I don’t understand its class connotation, but I have learned now, and I understand.

Many comrades, more than once, questioned me—questioned my rebellious activities at school and my experience working as a waiter, saying “all fabricated” or “I also think it’s not credible anymore, just write it as doubtful.” Good grief, if I write “doubtful,” it not only fails to prove my rigor but also gives you an excuse to label me. If you really want to know about my rebellious activities at school, I can even give you the QQ of classmates I still keep in touch with; go ask them yourself. “No investigation, no right to speak,” you say, but you jump to conclusions without asking, claiming it’s fabricated. I think you are the ones viewing me through bourgeois human nature theory. I previously briefly mentioned my experience working as a farmer and also wrote about an incident that happened when I was a waiter. I thought that was enough. Boasting that I went to the countryside at 14 and worked as a waiter is not a good thing. Now, if I had written it, you might think I was showing off my seniority and label me again. But I still have to write to respond.

The rural area I went to is in the most remote town of our district. It takes about 40 minutes walking from the bus stop to my grandmother’s house, where I did farm work. There was only a cement road around 2018-2019; before that, it was a gravel road, and earlier, a mud road. My grandmother was born into a poor peasant family. When I worked with her, I often asked about her past. She said they were very poor, collectivization was very bad, and they were extremely destitute. She was very grateful for Deng Xiaoping’s household contract responsibility system, which she said was about land division, allowing their family to eat enough. I didn’t argue at the time, but later I thought: 1. Maybe the People’s Commune they were in was indeed poorly managed; 2. She had a serious private ownership concept and liked small-scale production. I watched sheep—either crossing the river and driving the sheep to the other side, which takes about 10 minutes, because the grass there is very good; or walking about 7-8 minutes behind the house mountain to the dried or semi-dried fields, then tying the sheep to a tree. When I harvested grains in summer, the husks would stick to me, causing large red swelling and itching all over, even after wiping myself. Every year I had to buy kudzu, and I was responsible for pushing the cleaned kudzu in a cart to the place where it was shredded—about 50 meters with an uphill and a flat section. Then I helped my grandmother put the cleaned kudzu into a machine that crushed it. There’s also a skill in transplanting rice seedlings—you can’t plant them too far apart or too close, and they are inserted upside down, one handful at a time, into the water paddy. Sometimes, after transplanting, my feet would itch. Other things include planting garlic, shelling corn, fertilizing—too many to list. Also, I should mention that my grandmother said she married into my grandfather’s family, and her mother-in-law would beat her and was afraid she would run away, so she wasn’t allowed to learn characters. I worked as a waiter at a beef noodle restaurant in a certain province and city. Once, there was an aunt, I remember she was about 47 years old, liked reading novels, but for some reason, she often had conflicts with colleagues, which made the restaurant manager unhappy. She was a single mother raising a child and had a mental illness. Every time the manager wanted to fire her, she would beg bitterly and cry. I thought she was very unlucky. At that time, I didn’t talk much about communism with colleagues; I thought if I did, they would mock my youth. There’s another thing I mentioned before, I won’t repeat it. I felt that the worker aristocrat didn’t treat me as an adult, and he didn’t look at us with respect, so he lost his temper. Labeling me as a “good servant,” I just speak facts—indeed, the manager paid me 2,000 yuan a month, and I didn’t know if colleagues’ wages were deducted. If I wanted to strike and demand wages, I would need a reason.

Overall, some of the labels you’ve put on me are hard for me to bear. What is “seeking truth from facts”?

Doubting whether your rebellion at school is mainstream or not, isn’t the mainstream thinking that what you did at school doesn’t matter? Not sticking to rules and fighting against the gatekeepers, parents, and teachers. You love to boast about what you did in the toilet and how you promoted Marxism—everyone has seen it. Isn’t it just trying to use Marxism to boost your fame?

Aren’t you just attacking us as capitalists wanting to exaggerate? Can you answer why everyone looks like AI?

Can you answer which Marxist can confidently say that I like lazy Lafite?

15 Likes

Can you take off the mask of “revolutionary” and “worker” and have a good conversation with us?

6 Likes

Why do people who care about the women’s liberation movement like to watch secondary world young girl hentai characters “Raffi,” and why do they never criticize their own hentai thoughts?

8 Likes

“Labeling,” your statement is identical to those liberals and fascists who slander the Cultural Revolution period by criticizing the capitalist-roaders and rightists; have we previously responded to your behaviors such as色情 (pornography), male chauvinism, playing both sides, personal insults, etc., with reason and evidence, but you ignore them as if they were air, thinking our conclusions are just made up out of thin air?
Our understanding of you is from shallow to deep and clear. The more your stubborn reactionary male chauvinist stance is exposed, the more we need to criticize. Yet, your responses are repeatedly counterattacks and distortions of the facts. May I ask, what reason do you have to dare to say “seeking truth from facts”?

7 Likes

People who criticize others for being unhappy in life or work—who are they in this society? Isn’t it just capitalists and their lackeys who are the most content? Just like I was in the past, relying on family to get into public institutions, working only a few hours a day. Earning seven or eight thousand a month, doing whatever work I want, or not working if I don’t feel like it. Relying on the exploitation of the family’s property, not worrying about rent, and eating either cooked by others or ordering takeout and selling it wildly. Playing whatever I want. Is this life not satisfying? But what is this satisfied life? It’s a group of female workers under outsourcing, doing the same work as me, but working over ten hours a day, earning only two to three thousand, and being insulted if they make a small mistake at work. Most of the work in that state-owned enterprise was done by them; without them, the unit would have long collapsed. I originally had no complaints about your state, and I thought the ideological struggle of the association was very “extreme,” because I was very satisfied with that kind of life in the past, and I was grateful to the Zhongxiu government and bureaucrats who provided all this. But after I got out of that life, I started looking for jobs outside, renting a house, and only then did I realize how difficult it is to support myself alone in this society. From paying rent to being despised and looked down upon by what you call a satisfied life—those who are satisfied. Only then did I somewhat understand why the latter might have complaints, “unsatisfied.” You say everyone is unsatisfied, so they attack you; it’s just that the satisfied are your accomplices. The reason everyone joins the revolution is because they are dissatisfied with oppression and exploitation. It’s a dissatisfaction with those who are satisfied with life. You are not the enemy of the collective; who is?

15 Likes

Are you too shameless, acting as if you care a lot about the women’s liberation movement? Someone who can romanticize extreme reactionary pornographic ideas and oppressive thoughts—such as pedophilia—by just saying they find “young girls” cute, and who is parasitic and desperately chasing bourgeois academic opportunism, with a worldview that is egocentric, what does that have to do with women’s liberation? If anything, it can only be used to gain political capital from Marxism and women’s liberation issues or to pick up unnecessary face. Everyone has already seen what kind of person you are; there’s no need to pretend to be a worker or revolutionary.
[/quote]
Maybe, as comrades have said, I see myself as too important, but in fact, I have never had such an idea.
[/quote]
If you didn’t see yourself as too important, why would you strive for bourgeois academic opportunism and look for a high-paying job that “does not exploit people” in the future? Why, when everyone points out that you find Lafite from the game Azur Lane cute and love this character image, which is a perverse pedophilic obsession, do you either deny it, kneel and admit your mistake, or pretend to acknowledge it abstractly (having pornographic thoughts, but only as “residual”)? Why are you unwilling to drop your mask of “worker” and “revolutionary,” honestly reveal your personal history, and apologize for your mistakes? Your entire worldview is extreme individualism, which is egocentrism. Your mental illness is not an abstract illness; ultimately, it is a mental illness rooted in your thoughts. If you do not cure your ideological illness—transform your extreme individualist worldview—your mental illness will not get better.
[/quote]
In the past few days, I was indeed angry and confused, but now I have let it go. I believe that even if I am labeled and make mistakes, it does not affect my contribution to communism.
[/quote]
Your current contribution is to serve as a negative example, helping everyone see the difference between true revolution and false revolution, and distinguish between genuine revolutionaries and fake ones.

4 Likes

I sincerely advise you to take the good opportunity of International Women’s Day on March 8th to conduct a serious self-reflection. If you truly want to become a qualified revolutionary, you must at least show sincerity and not think of yourself as superior to others. I suggest you discuss in your self-criticism how反动的 (reactionary) the game “Azur Lane” is (you’ve played it, so you should be quite clear, if not, you can ask others), why you call comrades “中修机器人” (Middle-Revision Robots), and your desire to show off and seek attention. Also, if you haven’t started reading the “Guide to Ideological Struggle,” I recommend you read it. Additionally, you can read articles about the status of Chinese women and Zhu De, otherwise you won’t realize the ideological problems you have. I hope you will consider my advice.

6 Likes

I have to say, you are very good at spiritual victory. Not only did you completely dismiss the criticism you received in the past two days for defending your pornographic male chauvinist ideas, but you also distorted and slandered the criticism from others as “labeling,” and beautified your black-and-white reversal behavior as “not affecting the contribution to communism.” I have never seen someone as shameless as you.

13 Likes

Chairman Mao said: “Class struggle, some classes have triumphed, some classes have been eliminated. This is history, this is a thousands-year history of civilization. Explaining history from this perspective is called historical materialism, and the opposite viewpoint is historical idealism.” You are even confused about the most basic class analysis, yet you dare to claim that you “also have some understanding of historical materialism,” just to beautify yourself, right?

The previous second was pretending to praise Fenghuo, and the next second immediately began viciously attacking Fenghuo—that’s the most hypocritical and ugly face of the Marking King.

You think that experiencing rural life and working as a waiter is impressive, right? Many young people have lived in rural areas or trained in industry. Marking King thinks he is better than them and dares to call himself a revolutionary? He’s just a big official figure, looking down on the masses, seeing everything as nothing. If you’re so great, just peel off the skin and see—you’re just a boastful, selfish small bourgeoisie. You just want to read opportunistic books, pursue personal gain without regard for others, and want to exploit people. What qualification do you have to pretend to be a communist “selfless and dedicated to others” spirit? Someone who isn’t even a proletarian, yet dares to call himself a revolutionary—how shameless. You can do whatever you want, call yourself a revolutionary or whatever, but please don’t shout at us and ask us to recognize your “great achievements,” okay?

5 Likes

Basically correct, but there is one issue: he didn’t hit his core pain points. In fact, the pain points of the King of Signs are those issues he repeatedly avoids. As for what “Number One Service Worker,” doing farm work, being a waiter, these are all smokescreens he uses to stir up trouble. His core problems are: ① Recognizing and defending male chauvinist and pornographic ideas, systematically justifying male chauvinist and pornographic ideas; ② Boasting about his “capital” with bourgeois individualist mentality, looking down on the proletariat (taking pride in attending “one of the top schools in Chongqing,” mocking “people with unfulfilled lives”); ③ Having a very strong opportunistic revolutionary mentality (comparing himself to Zhu De, attempting to opportunistically demand “rewards” for revolution); ④ Playing with extremely reactionary bourgeois human nature theories, falsely accusing others, fabricating charges, confusing right and wrong, spreading rumors and attacking. He always avoids discussing these four points; what he dare not touch is precisely his most serious problem. Don’t be fooled by his sophistry and all those trivial matters—those are actually insignificant issues. He himself speaks ambiguously, merely playing word games.

13 Likes

Q:
How long have you been a service worker and how did you leave the job?
What is the minimum wage standard in the city where you work, do you know?
Is your salary higher or lower than this standard?
How many hours do you work each day, how are your shifts scheduled, do you work on holidays, and do you receive statutory triple pay and overtime pay when on duty?
If your monthly salary is 2000 yuan, and if you work fewer days than a full month (for example, only 10 days in the last month), do you calculate daily wages by dividing the monthly salary by the statutory 21.75 days and request the employer to settle accordingly?
When resigning, is your salary settled immediately, or on the 15th of the month or the next month?
Are there probation, trial, and formal employment periods? Are wages paid during probation? Is the probation wage 80% of the formal wage?
Is there a signed labor contract, and are there two copies of the contract? Is social insurance paid? If no contract is signed and no social insurance is paid, and you have worked for more than a month, do you fight for double wages to compensate?
Are there fines or other “compensation” methods, and have you or your coworkers been fined?

7 Likes

In fact, asking the marsh soldier like this is not very useful. Marking King is just doing positivism, talking about what work he has done, spreading Marxism-Leninism in school, and so on. Even if these things are true, they are meaningless. Because even if Marking King has done these things, it cannot cover up his current attitude towards revolution, our association, and his own色情思想 (pornographic thoughts). These are the truly strange parts. If it is really as he says, that he has done these things, then why is he still so resistant to criticism from everyone, even resorting to elaborate sophistry and counterattacks? When you tell him these things, it hits right at his weakness, because we have no concrete evidence of these things. He cannot prove that he is telling the truth, but we also cannot prove that he is lying. Just letting him self-verify the facts actually gives him an opportunity to exploit. Whether true or false, it allows him to evade criticism and questioning from everyone about his attitude. Instead, he can use this opportunity to say that we are suspicious and distrustful of him. The key is still to focus on ideological struggle and attitude issues.

12 Likes

Shameless, conceited, bizarrely funny, lying through your teeth, foul-smelling_(Playing the victim) Wang:**

Apart from the first two “self-introductions,” you have posted three more posts in a row, and after reading these five posts, I am completely exhausted because you have been playing the same tricks throughout: refusing to answer specific questions—taking quotes out of context to distort others’ doubts—using the most shameless, most vulgar attitude to both play the victim and spew venom at everyone—after everyone exposes your specific errors, you continue to resist passively—opening new posts to continue the same pattern. Today, you have become so shameless and despicable that it’s completely intolerable. You are just like all the reactionaries in history who, despite being condemned and vilified by the masses, still have treacherous hearts—pretending to be “righteous,” using various revolutionary disguises to exonerate yourself; meanwhile, you become even more brazen in slandering and spitting venom, as if distorting facts like this can earn you some forgiveness. You, this arrogant drowning dog, will no longer be allowed to act so recklessly!

You say you want to commemorate International Women’s Day? You say you are “just with pornographic thoughts and not male chauvinist ideas”? Bah! Before uttering such ridiculous words, you better review what you have said and see how you are slapping yourself in the face! “When I was doing farm work and working as a waitress, I worked and talked with women, but unfortunately, I did not deeply feel the oppression of women.”

And then:

[quote="Marks_King, post:1, topic:2555]
My grandmother said that when she married into my grandfather’s family, my great-grandfather’s wife would beat her, fearing she would run away, and wouldn’t let her learn to read.
[/quote]

[quote="Marks_King, post:1, topic:2555]
I worked as a waitress at a beef noodle shop in a certain city in a certain province. Once, there was an auntie, I remember she was 47 at the time, she liked reading novels but for some reason, she often had conflicts with other colleagues, which made the restaurant manager unhappy with her. She was a single mother, raising a child, and had a mental illness. Every time the manager wanted to fire her, she would beg bitterly and cry. I thought at that time, this auntie was very unfortunate.
[/quote]

Well, how should Wang Jihua explain such contradictory words? Could it be that Wang Jihua doesn’t think what he said is suffering or oppression? Or does Wang Jihua only remember being abused at home and forget that women have been subjected to even more brutal domestic violence over the decades; only remember having a mental illness and forget that other women have been driven to mental illness?!! Ignoring the oppression women face, how can he dare to call himself a “Maoist” or boast about “caring about women’s liberation movements”?!!

Apart from these, Wang Jihua’s various evasive and confusing behaviors regarding patriarchal ideas are countless:

  1. Playing pornographic games as long as I maintain my “bottom line” internally, since they don’t expose sensitive body parts, and it’s just recommended by others, so it has nothing to do with me. No, accepting pornographic literature and art is using this tool to fulfill my internal fantasies and sexual oppression of women, which is objectifying women and deepening my male chauvinist ideas!
  2. At least in Chongqing, women are less oppressed or not oppressed at all, even riding on top of men! What are Wang Jihua’s arguments? My sister! And “Picky Ears”! Well, since Wang Jihua has always ignored the fact that his sister was abused by his grandfather and exploited by his mother, and that his grandmother has been subjected to domestic violence for decades, let’s look at this “Picky Ears” comment. My hometown is ten thousand and eighty thousand miles away from Wang Jihua’s, and there are no similar customs due to regional proximity. But in my hometown, women love to curse local men as lazy, cursing them day and night! Is it right to curse? Yes, it is! In my hometown, men rely on women to support them, while they sit back and sip “Dad’s tea,” cross-legged, buying prizes; men love to let women cook a big meal on holidays, but women have to stand and eat. There are many ways men oppress women, and women’s responses are mostly just cursing men as “lazy.” Wang Jihua can’t see this; he only sees his sister treating him badly, his grandmother daring to call his grandfather lazy, and women daring to complain about men a little, then he dares to say “our women here have high status!”

Bah!
Put an end to your hypocrisy, you thoroughly male chauvinist, from start to finish just dodging the key points. Everything you do is just to satisfy your vanity; your posts are just to boast about yourself. Before answering these questions, what face do you have to say you want to commemorate revolutionary women pioneers? Let’s tear off your ugly mask!

You say you understand historical materialism? I think it’s more like a pseudo-scientific historical perspective! First, regardless of how laughable and shameful it is that you slander Lu Xun for taking money from the Nationalist Party and then try to use Lu Xun’s words to exonerate yourself; whether it’s your shameless and shameless slander of primitive society’s history and your repeated sophistry and unrepentant attitude. How shameful and vulgar your slander of the history of the proletarian revolution! After so many corrections and clarifications from everyone, you still blame the “black route” on Chairman Mao, completely ignoring who actually led the “black route,” who fought against it throughout, you are simply extremely arrogant! Not satisfied with that, to exonerate yourself, you continue to slander the Bolshevik Party and compare these revolutionary martyrs with a bunch of cowards running away online—do you feel ashamed? After so many corrections and clarifications, have you ever responded directly to these criticisms? Have you ever responded without evasiveness, repeating tired old arguments? No, you haven’t. You still want to use opportunists who infiltrated the revolutionary ranks to cry injustice for yourself, but your revisionist stance exposes your disgusting position! You keep shouting revolutionary slogans, but your body and mind are constantly engaged in counter-revolutionary practices. You have never truly reflected; when you find that kneeling doesn’t work, you start crying injustice and whining, even boldly spouting reactionary words. I tell you, don’t bother with sophistry, pretending to be “considering the overall situation.” Someone who truly considers their revolutionary political life, the development of the revolutionary team, and the construction of the revolutionary cause, should do only one thing when mistakes occur: humbly listen to everyone’s opinions immediately, rather than spouting abstract repentance words to cover up; when discovering mistakes, immediately reflect on your actions with Marxist-Leninist-Maoist thought, like a surgical knife, precise and ruthless, to root out errors, sweeping away fallen leaves—no mercy! All this is out of a sincere wish for you to truly correct your mistakes, dedicate yourself to revolution, not to indulge in “friendship” or leniency. If you do that, it will never truly help you, help you change your faults, help you enter the vast ocean of revolution, or help you truly fight against oppressors. If you only want to hear good words, this place will never do such things that trample on revolution.

I have only one last sentence: please examine yourself carefully and think about which path you want to take.

12 Likes

Long time no see, shovel. I wonder how you’ve been recently.

3 Likes

Why don’t you explain to everyone why you suddenly disappeared for so long?

4 Likes

And what about you? While saying these passionate words, don’t say one thing and do another. Just be honest about what you’ve been doing during this time of disappearance. Otherwise, constantly posting seemingly correct words while actually being very corrupt outside of revolutionary organizational life will lead you to become a revisionist.

9 Likes

Okay, I will… I have actually been writing off and on for several days. I want to explain everything as clearly as possible, and I will be honest.

2 Likes

Got it, I will try to make it clear to everyone tonight.

9 Likes

Hurry up and send it out, we’re waiting for you @Shovel

1 Like