As the title suggests, this is my diary from December 2025. The year is about to pass, and I hope to make a qualitative progress in my thoughts this month. Over the past two weekends, I indulged in pleasure at home (started watching videos again) too much, which affected my rest. The advantage of organizing paper documents was lost due to indulgence, and I always couldn’t finish posts. When I returned to school, I felt mentally exhausted and listless. Now I think I need to jump out and stop indulging. Comrade Fenghuo’s “Guide to Ideological Struggle” makes it very clear: “Cannot indulge in low-level hobbies under the banner of rest”, otherwise it will greatly damage energy, cause brain decline, and produce the ideological basis for traitors and capitalist-roaders. So I must not continue like this. This is not a matter of covering one tendency with another, but a serious revival of petty-bourgeois ideology, which must be eradicated. Repeatedly stopping and not making progress means falling behind the revolution. Here I serve as a negative example for comrades—don’t let pleasure seduce you away!
December 1
This morning I felt especially exhausted. After going downstairs for the flag-raising ceremony, besides the theme being safety and similar topics, I forgot everything after a few naps (
I was just too tired); the classes in the morning were also very tiring. Old Nine tried to sneak a nap when I wasn’t paying attention, often falling into shallow sleep. During the English class, Old Nine even scolded me and a few other students: “Don’t lie down over there! Still looking listless in class, what did you do last night?” I only remember Old Nine saying that.
In the fifth self-study session, I read Chapter 3, Section 2 of Introduction to Political Economy: Wage Forms. I have a question here: now many black factories in Zhongxiu (中修) generally have super-economic coercion, but hasn’t Zhongxiu long since abolished feudal production relations? How should this be explained? And how should we interpret the wage system of these black factories?
The first class in the afternoon was interrupted by the school bell, and seeing my classmate already standing up, I hurried to stand up too. The next chemistry class was still drowsy. By the second self-study session, I finished reading the second chapter. Then I started taking notes. After the third geography class, I quickly went to take notes again. But I felt my writing was too verbose and inefficient: I only managed to finish the part about time-based wages.
The main news points from the early evening Joint Focus are:
-
The reactionary leader Macron from France is scheduled to visit Zhongxiu (中修) soon. When mentioning socialist China and France establishing diplomatic relations, Zhongxiu shamelessly claimed, “France was the first Western country to establish diplomatic relations with China,” completely removing the efforts of the Chinese and French peoples and instead attributing it to the active merit of France’s monopolist bourgeoisie!
-
Zhongxiu’s stance on Japan’s actions is “absolutely not lenient.” It’s still the old chauvinist routine—nothing but fabricating national contradictions; it even reflects Zhongxiu’s insufficient preparation. Otherwise, this fascist imperialist country would have already used this as an excuse to invade Taiwan and launch a “three-war” campaign!
-
The “farce” where Israeli fascist leader Netanyahu requests amnesty. The news mentioned that before the verdict on Netanyahu’s corruption trial, he demanded that Israel’s president grant him early acquittal. This completely bypasses bourgeois formal judicial procedures and is an outright naked act, immediately protested by the Israeli people. Although the masses have not yet fully recognized the class nature and reactionary character of the judiciary, they clearly see that Netanyahu, as a politician, is trying to evade his crimes and maintain his political life (though his crimes are countless).
In the evening self-study, Old Nine in math took out materials on conic sections and told us to copy them, “one page every five minutes”; in reality, it took ten minutes per page, and students couldn’t work like machines! Later, Old Nine checked and said, “You’re copying too slowly!” She personally supervised, insisting on one page every five minutes. We could only work hard to copy. Later, in the evening class, she again took time to have us copy, that damn Old Nine! When we were copying, she even said, “Look at some students, after finishing the title, they never looked up again. This shows they are serious about studying, demanding of themselves, and have already memorized this content. You need to demand more of yourself, only then will you have a future and success!” To hell with you, Old Nine, you’re just wasting our time with this conic section material, you really go out of your way to mess with us!
Afterward, in the evening math class, Old Nine heard that our class’s New Year’s Eve program was finally set as “National Song and Dance,” and she was very happy, saying, “The program will definitely win a prize” (but who knows, the school’s arts propaganda for this program is all about fake national unity in Zhongxiu, and many programs might be like that, probably won’t succeed). Then she also said, “This shows our class’s unity, friendship, and mutual help…” but that’s a bit too much and not very genuine.
And also, North Wind, can you specifically talk about what types and themes of videos you watch? The specific content of indulgence reflects a particular aspect of a person’s ideological reaction. Sharing it can help others criticize you. Ideological struggle is also part of class struggle, and as a member of our forum, North Wind, as well as a petty bourgeois still undergoing transformation, your ideological struggle is closely related to ours.
Ultimately, it depends on the content rather than the form. The equality under capitalism is only formal equality; in fact, there is inequality. Workers selling their labor power is based on having nothing and being forced to sell their labor power freely. Moreover, as imperialism becomes increasingly decayed, the bourgeoisie must tear apart this formal equality to maintain its rule. In substance, economic coercion and super-economic coercion are not insurmountably different; both are exploitation and oppression of one class by another. Additionally, Chinese monopoly capitalism itself is the most reactionary revisionism, so it must rely on Confucian patriarchal systems to maintain its rule. I also believe that this patriarchal system has a certain social basis, mainly a special large landownership system financed by officials and capitalists, that is, through state monopoly capitalism owning land, along with a large number of small producers. However, these are not feudal land relations but are built on capitalist land relations. Furthermore, the wage system of black factories should also be analyzed specifically.
It’s this kind of illegal factory
Alright, here is the translation:
Yes. Previously, I was watching videos of a game called “Kards,” as well as secondary creative videos of the game “Blue Archive” (to be honest, these secondary creative videos are more straightforward and reactionary than the game itself: openly discussing sexual hints, slandering women, etc.). Sometimes, when I scroll down, I jump to explanations of some petty bourgeois or bourgeois “poisonous” movies. I always wanted to escape this problem but was afraid to speak out and seek help, which led to these issues never being eradicated. Coupled with the material basis of student parasitism, I kept alternating between suppressing myself at school and indulging in pleasure at home on weekends, feeling miserable. If I had completely lost my revolutionary consciousness before, I guess I wouldn’t just stop writing diaries, I might not even come to the forum anymore! Please comrades, help me!
So, what kind of life are you living now? Let’s talk more with everyone. You can think about why you like this kind of game.
I also often刷kards and similar games, which basically encourage you to become that kind of bourgeois general, only able to get promoted and make money, regardless of how many people die. Moreover, it uses card formats to hide the fact that soldiers are sent to their deaths. In Blue Archive, many characters are young girls, and there is a lot of pedophilic content. Since returning to the association, I haven’t looked at these things much. First, let me explain what these things are, and later I will talk about my own situation to help Beifeng.
Beifeng should elevate his own problems to a class perspective, thinking that these spiritual opiates are created by the bourgeoisie to numb the people, poison the youth, and wear down people’s fighting spirit. This is the class struggle in the realm of ideology. Beifeng’s obsession with these directly results in losing class consciousness when encountering class oppression at school, and both the anger towards oppression and sympathy for the oppressed become dulled. Many numb students in capitalist schools are like this, Beifeng must have seen it too.
He should also take out the specific content of the spiritual opiates he is addicted to for criticism, reflect on why he likes these, and think about their reactionary nature from a political height. I remember that 《Kards》 is a game that promotes fascist ideas, and games like 《Blue Archive》 completely portray women as sexual tools, which is an insult to women. I also used to be addicted to similar spiritual opiates; I will reply to you about these later during the day.
Super-economic coercion is not the foundation of feudalism; the core of feudalism ultimately still lies in the ownership system of feudal means of production. Although we are no longer in a feudal society, super-economic coercion has not exited the stage of history. Social consciousness has relative independence. In Chinese society, where feudal patriarchal hierarchical relations are still seriously residual under Confucian filial piety, the bourgeoisie often colludes with feudal patriarchs within local clan relations economically, or they themselves are local clan heads, to ruthlessly exploit workers and laborers of the same bloodline and surname. Verbally familiar, claiming “we are all family,” creating superficial harmony and peace, so that workers, no matter how oppressed and suffering, do not resist—after all, “we are all family,” or phrases like “what’s wrong with helping family members,” “he is your XX,” etc., are used to force workers to accept capitalist exploitation through feudal kinship relations, forbidding resistance, otherwise it would be considered treason and a violation of etiquette and family loyalty. This is the super-economic coercion characteristic of Chinese society under the severe residual modern feudal relations. As for the “these black factories” you mentioned, I don’t know exactly which ones or what types you are referring to; specific issues need to be analyzed case by case.
There is indeed some truth to it. Just like the existence of primitive children involved in black-market activities today, and dark phenomena like the Shennongjia Bigfoot incident where disabled people are imprisoned, fundamentally, slave societies, feudal societies, and capitalist societies are all societies of the exploiting class. Many phenomena are similar or have strong remnants of the old, which is normal. The exploiting class is united in their opposition to the people, so they do not completely reject the old systems; instead, they may preserve and utilize them.
December 2
This morning’s spirit was better than yesterday’s; at least after the second class, I no longer felt sleepy, especially during the third and fourth Chinese classes. On one hand, this was because I had enough sleep in the first two classes in the morning to restore my energy; on the other hand, it was because the old Ninth Chinese teacher was teaching a famous black article “Complete Practice is the Only Standard for Testing True Benefit,” which immediately made me focus fully. Next, I will share some opinions on this black article; if there are mistakes, please point them out:
1978 was the second year after Chairman Mao’s death and the restoration of capitalism by the revisionist faction. At this time, the new capitalist-roaders led by Huaxiu, who falsely claimed to be Mao’s “successor,” had seized power. To deceive the masses, Huaxiu proposed the “Two Whatevers,” as if he were Mao’s rightful successor, inheriting Mao Zedong Thought. However, since he openly halted the Cultural Revolution and carried out capitalist restoration in practice, especially his forcible arrests of comrades Jiang Qing, Zhang Chunqiao, and other central revolutionary leaders, undermining socialist rule of law and revolutionary efforts, had long caused dissatisfaction among the masses and lost their trust; meanwhile, the old capitalist-roaders were also dissatisfied with the new capitalist-roaders’ power struggles and unwilling to share power broadly. To seize power when Huaxiu’s group lost the support of the people, and to further counterattack the Marxist-Leninist-Maoist and remaining revolutionary factions, the old capitalist-roaders prepared to manipulate “truth.” That year, Dengxiu’s group instructed their scribes to write this black article, initiating a “big discussion” on the falsehood and truth of “truth” (to be honest, wasn’t this big discussion just their self-praise and self-glorification?), secretly replacing Marxism-Leninism-Maoism with bourgeois vulgar reactionary pragmatism, preparing ideologically for their rise to power, excluding Huaxiu’s group, and further restoring capitalism. Comrade Fenghuo once said, “After the capitalist restoration, the Chinese government used the ‘Great Discussion on the Standard of Truth’ to deny Marxism comprehensively with sophistry, under the guise of ‘practice is the sole criterion for testing truth,’ smuggling pragmatist philosophy, and opening the door to bourgeois idealism.”[1]
Comrade Fenghuo pointed out that pragmatism’s basic idea is: whatever conforms to one’s interests and is useful to oneself is truth.[2] Regarding its specific application in the Zhongxiu (revisionist) context, he said: “The leader of the Chinese revisionist group, Deng Xiaoping, also liked to talk about the ‘Black Cat, White Cat’ theory, which in fact means: whether the capitalist system is exploitative or not, as long as it makes a small handful of bourgeois rich, it is a reasonable system.”[3] This reactionary empiricism is one of the “theoretical” bases of Zhongxiu’s restoration of capitalism; unfortunately, as the poisonous article states, ”…it burst like soap bubbles very quickly.” Not to mention the objective facts of Zhongxiu’s capitalist restoration, just the philosophy that the bourgeoisie considers anything that conforms to its exploitation and oppression as “truth”—is this supported or believed by the broad masses of workers? Does it align with their fundamental interests? Absolutely not!
From the tone of the black article, Zhongxiu aims to “cleanse the influence of the Gang of Four” and “rectify chaos,” but in reality, this is an attempt to smear Mao Zedong Thought and attack our great leader Chairman Mao! In the part where Zhongxiu “criticizes” the Gang of Four, they use methods like misattribution (this is Lin Biao’s “crown,” his genius theory), distortion and slander (“Who said that ‘socialist production relations are the economic basis of the bourgeoisie’?”), denial (“What do you mean ‘Confucian-Legal struggle’ is nonsense? Then why do Liu Xiu and Lin Biao quote Confucius every day? How can that be nonsense? And now?”) among others, to smear Chairman Mao’s theory of continuing revolution and his specific practice of the “Cultural Revolution” as a ten-year chaos, claiming it was the “Gang of Four” trying to restore capitalism and seize power. Do revolutionary cadres and masses not know that comrades Zhang Chunqiao, Jiang Qing (note: traitors Yao and Wang cannot be counted) actively participated in the revolution and defended the proletarian cause under Mao’s leadership and personal instructions? This is essentially a vicious attack on Mao Zedong Thought, the dictatorship of the proletariat, and even Chairman Mao himself—such insidious and ugly faces! All these are evident even in the quotes from the mentors in the article (annoyingly, Zhongxiu didn’t even bold them!). The scribes also say, “Critiquing revisionism must be based on practice.” Considering the reactionary nature of empiricism, they are trying to deny the class struggle and the existence of revisionism, paving the way for their revisionist group. Finally, the scribes say, “Be brave to explore the forbidden zones set by the Gang of Four,” which is essentially telling the revisionists: “Go ahead and undermine the socialist wall, disintegrate socialism!”
In summary, it is easy to see what kind of black article this is! Using empiricism to substitute Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, preparing ideologically for capitalism’s restoration—that was the purpose of Zhongxiu at that time. They ultimately achieved their goal, as if their empiricism could forever exist and they could rest easy. But they celebrated too early. The reactionary philosophy of the revisionists is utterly vulnerable in the face of true Marxism; moreover, the facts of Zhongxiu’s capitalist restoration have already exposed the lies of their so-called “truth.” They will be overthrown sooner or later and swept into the dustbin of history!
The old Ninth Chinese teacher is quite cooperative with Zhongxiu: he comes from a landlord family, is a generation of college students after Zhongxiu’s restoration, and has been teaching for many years; needless to say, he and Zhongxiu are in the same ideological camp. In class, he said that during the Cultural Revolution, they could only eat rice bran and radish meals every day. Later, he also said that Chairman Mao was very “meticulous in instructing his successor” Huaxiu, who said, “You do things, I can rest assured” (Old Ninth seems very familiar with black market goods). He also said that to break the “Two Whatevers” (which Huaxiu used to maintain his rule and deceive the masses), Hu Yaobang asked the scribes to write this black article, letting Deng Xiu come out of the mountain, and Huaxiu “voluntarily” abdicated (you make it up, keep making it up); he also said that we “were born under the red flag,” and anyone who opposes Zhongxiu would be “chopped” (Would I be afraid? Would other comrades be afraid?). Old Ninth’s class still proceeds perfunctorily, discussing the reasoning and summarizing the title. His article today is unfinished, and he will continue tomorrow.
In the fifth reading class, we read three chapters and three sections of “Outline,” comparing the trend of the decline of the worker’s share and actual wages. I think that now, according to the official statistics released by Zhongxiu, the average wages of people seem to increase year by year (but that’s based on a yearly period), but in reality, only a small portion of the bourgeoisie, their lackeys, and the wealthy petty bourgeoisie (which I think, strictly speaking, their income cannot even be called “wages,” as they haven’t sold their labor) see their income rise; the wages of the broad masses of workers have been declining. It shows how parasitic and reactionary Zhongxiu’s group of bloodsuckers are—they artificially inflate the average income, making it seem as if wages are increasing annually!
In the afternoon, during the first three classes, the last was a listening class. I remember that physical teacher Old Ninth said that in the previous Zhongxiu-style high school physics exams, there was nothing to test, so they kept changing “new models” and “new ideas,” with clearly increased difficulty. The students complained about it. I think this is similar to the question-setting of the feudal landlord class’s imperial examinations during the Ming and Qing dynasties. During the listening class, I was writing about which black article.
In the evening, I watched “Common Concern” in advance; the content arranged by Zhongxiu was too absurd. I only saw Zhongxiu’s chauvinist propaganda about the reactionary remarks of Takashi Takamatsu (what is this “little pink” not going to Japan to tour and attacking Japanese tourism? It’s been almost a month of propaganda!).
This time, H passed the entrance exam for the revisionist youth group, and today at the school’s youth league meeting, he officially joined the league. Afterwards, he took the volunteer form for joining the league to me to fill in the introducer part, and I wrote a few nice words (meaningless platitudes, but enough).
[quote=“北风, post:8, topic:2151”]
And what do they say about us “born under the red flag”? Who dares oppose the Chinese Communist Party; they will be “chopped”[/quote]
The old nine’s words are too outrageous. In socialist China, people with wrong thoughts are not casually “chopped” just like that; only those who are extremely heinous and provoke great public outrage are executed by gunfire. Many children of capitalists are only sent down for reform through labor at most. Meanwhile, the bourgeoisie only resort to bloody suppression against the proletariat. Moreover, saying “born under the red flag” seems revolutionary, like socialism; yet saying that anyone who dares oppose will be “chopped”—isn’t that militarism or fascism? Doesn’t that really slap in the face when said aloud? It clearly exposes the essence of revisionism.
The school diary of Beifeng is quite substantial, and this article is also well written, showing that serious study of Marxist-Leninist knowledge has been undertaken.
Thank you Comrade Fenghuo. In fact, there are two more issues in my article: First, I did not analyze the “democratic faction” mentioned by the Zhongxiu; second, before the section where Zhongxiu slanders comrades Jiang Qing and others, I did not mention the part where Zhongxiu pretends to argue that “practice is the only criterion for testing truth.” There is also a later part about “the revolutionary mentor’s practical application” that indirectly flatters Zhongxiu, which I forgot to mention (the most direct example is a paragraph where Huaxiu says Chairman Mao carefully revised the articles), making my analysis of the toxic writing still incomplete. I think just adding one or two sentences to briefly mention these points would be enough. Can I modify it later and then send out this critique article separately?
And about my issue of indulgence. Regarding the fascist game Kards, I came across related videos in March this year; at that time, I watched a so-called “炸槽” (zha cao) gameplay video (just to mention briefly, the card name used in this operation, “八纮一宇” (Bāhóng Yī Yǔ), is a slogan of Japanese fascist invasion, which is quite reactionary). Many parasitic petty bourgeois students flooded in to play “炸槽,” and I also tried to join in. Later, I played on weekends, enjoying the feeling of being a general of the bourgeoisie (reactionary to the point of sending people to death in the game; in reality, it’s nothing, just emptiness). When I found a forum to introduce myself, I deleted my account. But since then, related videos have kept appearing, especially after the October long holiday and the past two weeks.
And the reactionary 二次元 (second dimension) game “Blue Archive.” I previously mentioned in my self-introduction that I started playing this game in the third year of junior high school. The female characters are either young girls or have overly prominent sexual features, completely treating women as sexual tools! As for the worldview, it is also quite reactionary: some nonsense called “Gakuen Toshi” (Academy City), everywhere are high school girls, and the residents are all robots and animals, with only the protagonist being a human male. This is an implicit hint at harem, reflecting how shameless bourgeois pornographic ideas are (they even extend their hands to underage girls!). There are also “divine” halos reflecting them as invulnerable, but when the halos break, they die. This is naked idealist philosophy: spirit is primary, matter is derived from it! Watching videos of this game is probably about the same frequency as “Kards”; the game account has been transferred away free of charge.
Can I write a critique specifically about this reactionary 二次元 game? I played it for over a year, and I was influenced by a lot of pornographic ideas, spending quite a bit of money on it. I know this game very well. I now plan to elevate this issue to a political level as Hongshu (Red Technique) suggests, thoroughly cleanse this poisonous weed, analyze the specific reasons for my indulgence (family loss of control, inability to self-manage my phone), and the root causes, “kick away that stumbling block,” and bravely move forward in the direction of revolution.
Sorry, I encountered some issues on my end, so I am only now posting to talk about my lifestyle and why I enjoy playing card games like Kards. Although I haven’t played Blue Archive, I have been exposed to a lot of anime-related pornography and often use these things for masturbation. So I also have these vile pornographic thoughts, and I can also share my current situation. Until November, I was working as a worker aristocrat, earning 5000~6000 yuan, with very little working time, only 2 or 3 hours. Clearly, with such a short working time and such a high salary, it actually means I have accepted the buyout by the bourgeoisie of the middle class, exploiting others’ labor in the form of work. To put it this way might not highlight my parasitism well, so I’ll talk about an outsourced job that is roughly similar in work content but more arduous: they only earn 2000~3000 yuan, work 8 or 9 hours a day, and have to get up at 6 in the morning (I start work after 8, and my working hours are very short, sometimes I don’t even need to show up in the morning). Under such a life, I have plenty of money and enough time to enjoy others’ labor, so I was exposed to a lot of spiritual opium during my student days: computer games and online novels. These all contain strong ideas of personal wealth, encouraging so-called personal struggle to plunder others’ property and become rich. So I have accepted and agreed with many of these ideas of personal wealth, often fantasizing about becoming a high official and getting rich. After I started playing Kards, I began to enjoy it. During the game, I even recharged quite a bit, about 1000 yuan. In this game, every win increases your stars, and a winning streak gives you two stars. Reaching 5 stars promotes you to the next level; losing causes you to lose stars, and at the current rank of 0 stars, losing three times in a row will cause a demotion. There are 25 ranks, from Private to Marshal. During this gameplay, I didn’t see anything wrong with it; rather, I felt it was fine and didn’t notice anything unusual. In fact, when I first encountered these things, I was already a member of the association, but because of my ideas of personal wealth, I became very addicted to these things. While playing this game, I was constantly thinking about how to get promoted and become a marshal, dreaming about assembling a huge (deck) army to defeat others and gain personal fame. Through this practice, my belief in personal wealth was further strengthened, and I gradually distanced myself from the association by not participating in ideological struggles with others. In fact, this game not only praises Japanese imperialism but also boasts about German, American, and British imperialism, claiming they have various high-tech weapons, making their armies very powerful (in the game, these cards have high attack and defense power). But in reality, the armies of Germany, Britain, and the US are composed of broad masses of workers who were deceived by the bourgeoisie into serving in the military for survival. They obey the interests of the monopoly bourgeoisie and have to bear various oppressive policies. Internal contradictions are extremely intense; how could they be truly powerful? But out of my desire for wealth, I disregarded this historical distortion and crazily played and watched Kards-related content. So, during this process, I absorbed the rotten history of the exploiting classes. That’s all for now; if I have time, I will continue writing about my thoughts and living situation.
December 3rd
During the second Chinese language class in the morning, unexpectedly, Lao Jiu did not talk about the toxic essay “Practice is the only criterion for testing truth,” but instead started discussing the next article “Establishing Sincerity” (1992). It seems Lao Jiu was quite perfunctory, not even finishing the main points of the previous toxic essay. Clearly, Lao Jiu in Chinese class is of a certain kind of virtue—skipping even the “important” articles of the master? I looked at the content of today’s article and found that the “sincerity” inside is just the “sincerity” of Zisi and Meng Gong! The author is quite frank about this, “The so-called truth in modern times, in ancient Confucianism, is called ‘sincerity’.” Then the author also says that “establishing sincerity” means aligning name and reality, words and deeds, inside and outside; in fact, it relies on reactionary idealist epistemology to understand things. The author then emphasizes “practice is the only criterion for testing truth,” and even drags in the nonsense that “establishing sincerity” involves issues of academic style (the author says, “Today, we should emphasize the factors of socialism,” emphasizing the Chinese socialist characteristics? What nonsense!). Obviously, the author is a positivist believer. Placing this toxic essay after “Practice is the only criterion for testing truth” in the Chinese textbook is clearly with ulterior motives.
Today during the big break, we second-year students went for a run. I injured my heel with a blister and was bleeding, so I couldn’t run and just observed from the side. Watching the classes of scattered students run past, I thought of the notorious Hengshui High School’s morning exercises, where students are as orderly as machines, which shows how strong the dictatorship is. Seeing that the students here haven’t been as badly damaged as Hengshui students, I felt some relief. But as soon as I think about the dictatorship in other aspects of the school, I become hateful: now the school everywhere seizes phones, even on weekends when students stay in the dorms, they still confiscate phones (weekends without classes, students stay at school, what does the school have to do with phones?). If caught with a phone, it is confiscated; if caught on a so-called “school day,” there will definitely be punishment (to scare), which is very barbaric and reactionary. To prevent being caught, I lock my phone in the cabinet.
During the fifth self-study class, we read Chapter 6 of “Concise World History”: the formation of the two main sources of World War II. Due to its poor economic situation and the continuous, escalating struggles of the domestic masses, the fascist dictatorship of China is on the brink of collapse; it has no choice but to initiate imperialist wars; it has already become a war source. Chairman Mao told us, “Fascism is war,” which is absolutely correct. The actions of the Nazi Germany, Japanese imperialists, and Soviet revisionists in the past, China will definitely follow: expanding armaments, waiting for the right moment to launch aggression!
In the afternoon political class, that annoying old political teacher came to class again, speaking very fast (just covering the exam content); he shamelessly praised the piglet as a “great man of five thousand years,” a “rare genius in governance.” This mediocrity even used Chairman Mao as a cushion for the piglet—how shameless! Can this revisionist, fascist leader compare to our great leader Mao Zedong?!
In the evening “Together Focus” program, there were many more viewers than usual, with the first 20 minutes mainly on political news (if only this were every day, I could learn more about international affairs). The main contents are as follows:
- Lai Qingde, a traitor, cultivated “independent” forces in Japan and was “warned” by China’s Taiwan Affairs Office;
- Regarding Takashi Takai’s reactionary remarks, China still promotes chauvinist propaganda widely. It seems that only if Takai publicly retracts and apologizes can it be settled. But will China, this paper tiger, “firmly stand its ground,” or will it downplay the issue? We will see after some time;
- The summit between Germany and Poland, during which Germany will return historical artifacts stolen during WWII from Poland; German politicians emphasize “historical responsibility” (meaning the invasion history of WWII); but has Germany’s monopoly capital stopped its economic invasion of other countries? Also, isn’t China just covertly attacking Japan?
- The US recklessly attacked the so-called drug smuggling ships in Venezuela, killing many people; during an operation on September 2, the US Secretary of Defense even verbally ordered to shoot dead the survivors on a small boat deemed “non-threatening,” claiming it was “for the complete security of the United States”! US President Trump also expressed support for this. Democratic parties are starting to create momentum to attack the Republicans. The US has been constantly threatening Venezuela militarily. Also, the conflict between the Venezuelan-controlled Citgo Petroleum and the US comprador government (opposition) is ongoing; now the US comprador controls the company and has brazenly ordered its sale to a domestic company. The Venezuelan comprador government firmly opposes, claiming the US is using deception to sell off Venezuela’s national assets.
December 4
In the morning, the dog school responded to “National Constitution Day” by calling us to do a “Constitution Morning Reading” before the official morning assembly at 7:10. They read out several excerpts from the current version of the reactionary constitution. Those excerpts completely emphasize loyalty to the revisionist Party and love for the revisionist country, which is very reactionary; I did not read along, just moved my lips a few times to pretend.
In the second Chinese class, Old Nine taught Lu Ling’s “Strange Compassion is Humanity’s Heavenly Nature.” Last night, I went home to get a book, busy typing on the forum, and only slept a little over four hours. I was very sleepy during this class, and I didn’t listen to Old Nine’s words at all; as for Rousseau’s “Compassion is Human Nature,” that is a metaphysical apriorism, treating human consciousness as innate, which is secretly promoting divine influence. Not to mention the progressive role of the bourgeois represented by Lu Ling at that time, claiming that mutual guarantee among humans depends on “compassion,” which can achieve harmony—this is not erasing class struggle or advocating violence to overthrow the exploiting class? To overthrow feudal landlords, but it becomes an exception for your own class! Also, the revisionist did not do any class analysis in this article (socialist textbooks probably wouldn’t include it), merely abstractly asking you to think whether human nature is “natural” or a product of social practice (expanded at the end of the book), without providing an answer—doesn’t the revisionist have ulterior motives?
In the fifth self-study period, we read Chapter 6, Section 3 of “Concise World History”: the anti-fascist struggles of various countries in the 1930s. The Communist Party of France and the Spanish Communist Party did not pay attention to leading the popular front, nor did they resolutely fight against hostile elements within the front, which led to the expulsion of the French CP from the front and the failure of the Spanish Republic; I was reminded of our Party’s stance in the Anti-Japanese National United Front—坚持独立又联合，坚决和国民党反动派的投降路线作斗争，放手人民群众，最终取得了抗日战争的胜利。From this perspective, it is fortunate that our country has a great leader like Chairman Mao; whereas the fascist Collet (法修多列士) betrayed the revolutionary movement of his own proletariat, talking about “unity” and losing leadership—truly shameless.
At noon, some classmates whispered that the school bookstore might be closed in the coming days. Our school bookstore is operated by a local bookstore, selling some opportunistic teaching aids, novels, and comics, at slightly lower prices than outside. Everyone said that the principal recently discovered the bookstore selling banned novels and comics, and plans to shut it down. (Strengthening dictatorship over students, closing the on-campus channels for purchasing novels and comics—this could indeed be a reason for the dog school, or it might be a contractual dispute. However, the school’s reason given is extremely absurd; see below for details.)
In the first physical education class in the afternoon, Old Nine called us into the classroom. First, she said that the previous internship teachers needed to refine their lessons during the internship period, and our free activity time was indeed very limited, but it will be available in the future; then she took a negative review from a student from an unknown class and “sincerely” advised us “to know how to be a person.” I was very annoyed—shouldn’t she first find out what the problem is when others give her negative reviews? It’s fine if she doesn’t clarify, but she even used her own grading to say “to know how to be a person.” What kind of arrogant attitude is this Old Nine showing to threaten us! Is this what the revisionist calls “setting an example as a teacher”? The true face of revisionism is now exposed.
After dinner in the afternoon, I hurried to the bookstore to check the situation. The books in the bookstore were already packed, and students still bought books with cash from time to time. I asked the staff why the school was closing the bookstore, and she replied that the school was “closing the bookstore according to higher-level leadership’s requirements to reduce burdens.” I was stunned. Then I angrily condemned the school’s dictatorship! The stupid school doesn’t reduce burdens through curriculum, homework, or weekends, but now claims “reducing burdens” by closing the bookstore? Who are they fooling? They are really not putting us students in their eyes! The school is trying every means to restrict our freedom, now it’s the bookstore’s turn. (Although almost all the books sold there are poisonous trash.)
In the evening “Joint Focus,” there was more international political news, including a piece about our country’s food delivery workers:
- The revisionist imperialist (Piglet, Macron) met in Beijing, with Macron bringing over 200 people in an inspection team. The revisionist claims this meeting is “historic”; the subsequent press conference by the revisionist Ministry of Commerce used this meeting to deceive the people into believing that “foreign investment has great confidence in our market.” The revisionist is still playing pragmatism, but how long can it fool people? Recently, the masses have begun to recognize the problems. (Also, during this press conference, the revisionist subtly hinted at Japan.)
- The revisionist continues its chauvinist propaganda about the reactionary remarks of Takashi Takamori. Today was different because, during the full Senate meeting yesterday, Takamori said: “The government’s stance on Taiwan is completely consistent with that of 1972.” The revisionist issued a “stern protest,” accusing Takamori of muddying the waters and trying to get away with it—she neither publicly insisted on the “One China” principle (the revisionist fabricated the fact of recognizing “Taiwan, Republic of China,” which I saw on the forum before), nor publicly retracted her reactionary remarks from November 7. (According to a bourgeois scholar in Japan, Takamori was giving a parliamentary reply at that time, and her remarks will be permanently recorded in Japan’s parliamentary records, with legal effect; this means that if she does not retract her reactionary remarks, future Japanese governments can cite this statement at any time and take lawful action.) Later, the revisionist also released accusations that Takamori took bribes and reports about fascist forces distributing “children’s versions” of the “Japan Defense White Paper” to Japanese elementary and middle school students (outrageous—fascists want to reach into children and youth! Just like their ancestors did during WWII!).
- The revisionist hypocritically claims to “protect the rights and interests of food delivery workers,” saying that platforms should “guarantee” workers’ “reasonable working hours,” “ensure one day off per week,” etc., and also claims that “when platforms need to amend clauses concerning the vital interests of delivery workers, they should fully listen to the opinions of the platform itself, trade unions, and delivery worker representatives.” The revisionist’s trade unions are well known to every worker and Marxist; and what about these so-called delivery worker representatives—are they really “representatives”? Or can they truly represent? The revisionist’s claim to listen to all parties is just another caprice of capitalists! Putting up a “protect delivery workers” smokescreen is just to deceive the masses. But do you think the masses, especially delivery workers, will fall for it? Dream on, revisionist! The masses, especially delivery workers, will never be fooled!
- Negotiations between the US imperialists and the Russian imperialists. US officials revealed to the media that the core issue in the negotiations is “whether Ukraine will join NATO” (it seems there is no ambiguity about Ukraine’s territory being taken by the Russian imperialists). Peskov, the press secretary of Putin, said that the fewer details released about the US-Russia negotiations, the more advantageous it is for both sides. The meeting between US representatives and Ukrainian puppet Zelensky was moved to the US and postponed.
Please wait a moment, I am eating dinner now, I will send the Friday journal later.
The Northern Wind has written some quite remarkable records recently, because I have been paying close attention to current affairs and class struggles in life. I wonder how things have been these past few days, and what the situation is with the thoughts and struggles related to indulgence.