I am creating this post in the hope that forum user @olkkk can provide a straightforward explanation of what purpose they are pursuing on the Proletarian Liberation Struggle Forum. Over the past few days, other members have responded to and criticized the erroneous remarks made by olkkk on the forum, but I believe olkkk does not intend to engage in normal, friendly exchanges, as they always appear in a sarcastic, mockingly ironic manner. The forum does not oppose people holding erroneous views or thoughts; as long as they are not saboteurs, everyone has freedom of speech on the forum, and erroneous ideas can only be exposed through discussion. However, with the freedom to express wrong opinions comes the freedom to criticize them. Moreover, the contradictions between enemies and us, and within the people, sometimes intertwine, and only through mass debates, large-scale discussions, and open discourse can we distinguish between friends and foes—helping those with wrong ideas to recognize their errors if they are willing to correct them, and exposing counter-revolutionary saboteurs disguised as the masses who have infiltrated among the people, thereby promoting the purity of the ranks. Recently, olkkk’s astonishing comments have provoked widespread outrage, so I am here to summarize and criticize some of olkkk’s remarks, and I also hope olkkk can respond positively—truth will come to light.
In the post “What Kind of Parental Love Do We Need,” olkkk said:
In the replies, others pointed out that this reflected a very wrong ideology—that the bourgeoisie created the poverty and suffering of the proletariat, and that the exploiting class has caused all the hardships faced by the masses. They have been inciting the younger generation to hate and discriminate against the proletariat and the working people. But when someone exposes all this and the proletariat needs to counterattack the bourgeoisie, olkkk again claims that we want the descendants of the proletariat to “remember endless hatred,” essentially implying that we are instigating eternal hatred and conflict. Such thinking is the same as the Western European bourgeoisie’s past slander that Marx and Engels’ ideas created class struggle. This is a double standard. They ignore the centuries of oppression and hatred inflicted by the exploiting class on the masses, and when the proletariat fights for liberation, they accuse it of inciting hatred, pretending to be a moral exemplar. Ask yourself, whose side are they really on?
After other forum members seriously criticized olkkk’s erroneous views, olkkk shifted the topic, saying we want future generations to “storm the streets to confront the government,” or compare us to “Xujiajin, indiscriminately killing people,” or just mockingly say others “overreach” or “I might as well commit suicide,” but he has never directly explained his own remarks or responded to this debate.
In the post “Family Struggles and Ideological Issues” by ChiTie1, olkkk responded to others’ active self-reflection and exposure of their ideological problems:
I rebutted him below:
It’s very clear here that olkkk’s remarks are extremely irresponsible. If olkkk has no malicious intent, only a lack of understanding, then he should continue to exchange ideas when criticized. But he casually drops this misleading statement about misleading others and then never replies further in this thread.
In the post “A Student’s Big-character Poster — A Complaint Against Feudal Parents and the Revisionist Behind Them,” olkkk made provocative remarks with liberal views discriminating against Chinese people. After being criticized, he quickly claimed it was “just different understandings” and tried to end the discussion, refusing to give a direct explanation for his reckless remarks. When I pointed out that this attitude was like a bandit fleeing after inciting chaos, olkkk said “like the Red Guards during the Cultural Revolution, still not letting people sleep.” First, no one is preventing him from sleeping; he’s just changing the subject and throwing accusations. I asked him to give a clear explanation of his remarks instead of provoking fights and insults, but he suddenly got anxious, claiming I was “not letting him sleep,” and started giving condescending moral lectures. Why is olkkk suddenly so anxious? Moreover, comparing the Cultural Revolution and the Red Guards exposes his anti-communist, anti-socialist stance. Later, when others responded, he started playing sophistry (confusing right and wrong ideas, blurring concepts), defending “revolutionary unity of the petty bourgeoisie” with the excuse of “parasiting at home and watching porn” (which is essentially a backward, petty-bourgeois stance that unity does not mean tolerating all wrong ideas, otherwise there’s no “revolution”).
Most outrageous and reactionary are olkkk’s frequent vulgar, hooligan remarks:
Such remarks fully reveal olkkk’s bourgeois male chauvinist and pornographic mindset, treating women solely as objects to satisfy his savage, shameless sexual desires. When others pointed out his problems, he responded:
Other forum users have sternly criticized his hooligan behavior:
And Hughes responded:
Overall, olkkk’s remarks always carry a vulgar, petty, hooliganish flavor, filled with hatred toward the proletariat, the masses, and women. When others point out his irresponsibility and destructive tendencies, he stops replying; when his views are thoroughly refuted, he disappears. Then he moves to other posts to continue his antics. This makes one suspect: what exactly is olkkk’s true intention? What purpose does he have in participating in the forum?
This vulgar, petty, hooliganish way of speaking fully exposes olkkk’s extremely reactionary, exploitative class ideology. Such a person in real life would only be extremely selfish and narrow-minded socially. He merely wants to use a “smile to hide hostility” Confucian tactic to disgust others, treating others as clowns, like some past individuals:
For those who don’t understand Marxism, don’t realize that psychologists are products of capitalism, and that porn culture oppresses women, as long as they oppose capitalist oppression and are willing to communicate normally and amicably, the forum has always patiently persuaded and actively exchanged. But olkkk not only seems to come from a completely different world from forum members, with no Marxist atmosphere in his speech, but also full of sarcasm and mockery. After “bullying” others, he then appears as a typical thief crying “stop thief,” attacking forum members by saying “everyone is bothering me,” sarcastically claiming “I’m just an outsider.”
But what kind of isolated, introverted person would think others’ unity is something to mock? The forum rules have long explained:
Furthermore, olkkk’s views fall within the scope of reactionary ideas as defined by the forum rules (General Rule Article 10: promoting Confucian ideas; promoting pornographic ideas; promoting vulgar, lowbrow ideas; promoting bourgeois patriarchy, especially openly discriminating against and insulting women; promoting liberal ideas). For these, forum members perform their revolutionary duty by criticizing, maintaining the purity of the forum environment, and opposing bourgeois and exploitative ideas—are they committing some heinous crime? Olkkk’s stance is essentially that he can freely spout reckless remarks, violate forum rules, and mock others, but he refuses to allow others to openly criticize, oppose, or engage in normal exchanges. He claims he has the freedom to make erroneous remarks, but others do not have the freedom to criticize them—that’s truly liberal!
However, the tolerance of forum members is limited. We cannot let olkkk continue to behave recklessly forever. This post is also meant to encourage olkkk to communicate normally and stop the old tricks. Nobody is foolish; everyone can see through olkkk’s activities, and there’s no need to pretend or hide. Of course, this post is not specifically for olkkk alone but aims to serve as a warning or awakening for all those who want to satisfy their inferior, shameless bourgeois superiority complex by anti-communist, anti-people, anti-women liberation sentiments, and who think the Proletarian Liberation Struggle Association and Forum are playgrounds where they can attack and humiliate at will, without any authority.
