Regarding recent fascists maliciously reposting on the bourgeois video platform bilibili, collectively insulting forum articles and members.

Recently, a fascist individual with the Bilibili ID “A Brown Bear” has been extracting forum articles and school diaries of forum members on the bourgeois video platform bilibili, using AI voiceovers to produce low-quality videos, accompanied by insulting titles. They attempt to attack and slander the forum and its members through such means. After watching, I believe this person and the reactionary elements beneath their videos display an extremely arrogant attitude, with despicable and shameless conduct, which made me very angry, so I wrote this free discussion to share my views.

1. What is the course of the matter?

On September 11th, this fascist individual posted such a video for the first time, quoting parts of the forum article “Critique of Reactionary Games ” and accompanying it with the text “Critique of the Crazy Leftist Poisonous Grass Plants vs. Zombies.” The author deliberately used this video format to attract the attention of online fascists. The vast majority of active fascists on China’s internet are often small-bourgeois rightists, detached from social practice, consisting of petty-bourgeois students or freeloaders who live off their families, the most reactionary faction within the petty bourgeoisie. They are full and idle all day, parasitizing on their families, eating without working. In terms of social practice, they rarely experience the enslavement and oppression of capitalist families and schools. Due to their reactionary economic status, they are keen to invest a lot of time in various reactionary capitalist arts and literature, satisfying their extreme individualist ideas through capitalist spiritual opium. They are essentially the same as the so-called “Leftists on the Net” (who pretend to be Marxists, deceive by waving the banner of Marxism, and use public dissatisfaction with the Nazi government to speculate and profit, thus maintaining or elevating their class status).

As time progresses, some deceived petty-bourgeois individuals gradually detach from the so-called “Leftists on the Net,” and many “revolutionaries” have seen their identities collapse. These fascists seize this opportunity, attacking the “Leftists on the Net” on the surface, but actually attacking communism through entertainment and fascist jokes, colluding with the “Leftists” who pretend to be Marxists, spreading reactionary rhetoric from within to attack Marxism, while fascists attack from outside. They consciously serve to maintain Nazi rule through this method.

Therefore, such a video title immediately catches their attention, being “Leftist on the Net” and criticizing one of their favorite games, “Plants vs. Zombies.” Plus, the video creator, following the usual style of fascists—avoiding logical and thorough theoretical debates, preferring to indulge in thoughtless personal attacks for entertainment (their brains have long been degraded by prolonged indulgence)—intentionally only extracts a small part of the forum article for other fascists to enjoy. Despite its low quality, it attracted a lot of fascist attention, garnering nearly 270,000 views.

Fascists celebrate in the comments below the video, as if this is another great victory in slandering Marxism.

A graduate student who claims to have studied Marxism loudly proclaims, “Art can be separated from politics!” What does he mean by social relations and lifestyle? It’s unclear, but he then profoundly exposes his view: “Not all artistic works contain political metaphors.” From this, we see that in his eyes, “social relations” and “lifestyle” are separate from “political metaphors.” The content that most artistic works reflect is “social relations” and “lifestyle,” while “political metaphors” are not necessarily included.

What are “social relations” and “lifestyle”? Marx said, “The sum of production relations constitutes the so-called social relations, which make up the so-called society.” (Marx & Engels Selected Works, Volume 1, p. 363). Therefore, it is essentially the total of production relations, reflecting the relations among people. In the game Plants vs. Zombies, the zombies—armed with cannons, machine guns, poison gas, barbed wire, and bombs—kill unarmed, poorly dressed zombies holding old labor tools, which reflects the bourgeoisie’s domination over the proletariat and their use of this dominance to slander the proletariat—such social relations, isn’t it?

Consistently anti-communist fascists say, “Look! This is evidence from fifty years ago!”

The “plants vs. zombies” enthusiast, who is unlearned and lacks thinking ability, completely disregards the original forum article, spouting nonsense, deceiving himself, and loudly claiming “This is over-interpretation!”

The video creator himself is even more reactionary, openly proposing to physically eliminate the forum by reporting it to Nazi police, opposing China’s communist movement.

Afterward, the creator still found it unsatisfactory and continued attacking the forum in a similar manner, producing more reactionary videos. Due to their lesser influence compared to this video, and because fascist comments are generally similar, I will not quote further.

From attacking the forum, they moved on to attacking forum members who are trying to reform their thoughts, attempting to hinder the forum’s development by spreading minority and garbage opinions online, blocking the revolutionary fire with internet violence—an impossible task!

2. The vile face of the author himself

From the above discussion, it’s clear that the author is exactly the kind of petty-bourgeois rightist who lives off parasitism, indulges in lust, and is extremely anti-communist. This is further evidenced by his list of posted videos and followed accounts.


Moreover, this person is even more disgusting: when posting a series of reactionary artistic works of low quality, he also pretends to be a patriotic democratic figure, talking about “Leftist on the Net but not truly left,” which is utterly nauseating! He pretends to be a foreign communist organization he knows little about, crying fake tears, while viciously attacking and insulting China’s own communist movement—this is the typical opportunism of fascist profiteers!

In his video “Commemoration of the 80th Anniversary of the Anti-Japanese War — [Lyrics] ‘Never, Japanese Devils’ (No, Molotov Rewritten Lyrics),” he shamelessly advocates for the Kuomintang generals’ slaughter of the people, claiming the “Heavenly Furnace” tactics are useless, shouting “The Japanese division that penetrated the Heavenly Furnace is hopelessly beyond rescue!”

It’s clear that fascists who love insulting and attacking forums are themselves “Leftists on the Net.”

3. Impact

Despite fascists frantically attacking organizations and forums through various means—spreading rumors, slander, and reporting—history’s laws will not change because of the shrill cries of a tiny minority of fascists.

The actions and insults of the author and fascists do not prove their correctness but only reveal their reactionary nature. The video creator himself is a living example. Based on our analysis of his video content and himself, isn’t it because he is idle all day, indulging in various low-level pleasures and spiritual opium, that he ultimately turns to anti-communism? His series of videos not only fail to prove the forum wrong but actually confirm its correctness. He sets an example, telling revolutionary sympathizers and the masses that those who live off others will indulge in spiritual opium and, by doing so, walk the road of anti-party, anti-communist, and anti-people!

Meanwhile, although bilibili is the most reactionary among bourgeois video platforms, with most users being petty-bourgeois rightists, there are still some voices in the comments below the insulting videos that support the forum’s articles. This fully proves that, apart from a small handful of reactionary petty-bourgeois rightists, the vast majority of petty-bourgeois people are willing to accept revolutionary theories and agree with revolutionary principles.

As Fenghuo Flame said in “The Road of Future Revolution in China”:
“The petty bourgeoisie tends to be overall backward but also has the potential to turn towards the proletariat.”
"However, hope for transformation and revolution still lurks within students. As Chinese society polarizes more severely, competition among petty-bourgeoisie intensifies, and the oppression from parents and schools toward students grows heavier. This will inevitably arouse students’ dissatisfaction with the bourgeois education system and capitalist political system, prompting their reflection. Although students have long lived parasitically off others, the capitalist social system will inevitably cast most of them into the ranks of exploited wage laborers. Faced with the only path of decline for the petty bourgeoisie—either scheming to be a good bourgeois dog, getting some scraps, or accepting the identity of the proletariat and rising up to fight against this unjust old society and joining the proletarian revolutionary torrent—that is the inevitable choice before these students.
Young students, despite being influenced by bourgeois education, and poisoned by spiritual opium and low-level pleasures, are still more open-minded than those who have been immersed in selfishness their whole lives. Their worldview is still developing and growing, with room for revolutionary transformation. With perseverance and determination, enduring long and painful ideological transformation, and shedding this decayed bourgeois culture from their minds, China’s young students still have great potential. They should recognize the inevitable demise of capitalism and the victory of socialism, join the great proletarian ranks, and participate in the righteous cause of liberating all humanity. All Marxists and revolutionary organizations in China should value this small bourgeois revolutionary force, actively encourage, support, and guide them onto the bright path of proletarian revolution. China’s revolution will dispel the gloom from our youth, making them once again “the sun at 8 or 9 in the morning”!

29 Likes

This group of reactionaries is rampantly clamoring in the comment section about preparing lighters and gasoline to commit arson at the Congress, making homemade guns, and chopping off the heads of association members. They only dare to cite some articles criticizing the game, yet they react so wildly, which only shows that the game touches their core interests. That is why they frantically shout counter-revolutionary remarks like Nazis. These people are probably all useless in reality, a group of parasites who only live off their families or workers, pink pigs. When the real revolution comes, they will be the foundation of the white bandit army. Moreover, the fact that they only dare to cite articles criticizing the game also shows that they can only use their fascist rhetoric to insult the game a few times; they probably cannot understand other theoretical articles.

8 Likes

Why bother with this little brat?

These petty-bourgeois right-wingers, some of whom are even bourgeois in words but can actually do such things. The Nazi SS was composed of these people. They don’t really want to cut off the heads of the association members, nor would they say such things. People cannot say things that are not in their worldview.

4 Likes

What does “little devils” mean? These people are the foundation of the future White Bandit Army and the assault troops; they will take up arms to suppress the revolution.

1 Like

Your viewpoint was already criticized in Chairman Mao’s article “Oppose Liberalism”:

“Hearing incorrect arguments and yet not disputing them, even hearing the words of counter-revolutionaries and not reporting them, remaining calm and indifferent, acting as if nothing happened. This is the sixth type.”…
“Seeing actions that harm the interests of the masses without anger, without advising, without stopping, without explaining, just letting it be. This is the eighth type.”
“Liberalism within revolutionary collective organizations is extremely harmful. It is a corrosive agent that causes disunity, loose relations, passive work, and differing opinions. It causes the revolutionary ranks to lose strict organization and discipline, policies cannot be fully implemented, and the party organization and the masses led by the party become isolated. This is a serious and bad tendency.”

First of all, your statement downgrades the issue. It seems as if the association does not need to manage the words of these counter-revolutionaries, and if it does, it is just us “meddling in other people’s business.” I want to say that this rebuttal article is very necessary; it precisely shows that the association is a revolutionary organization with revolutionary principles, not a faction without discipline waving the tiger skin and big banner as some online right-wingers call “online left” (the real “online left” and right-wing are just two sides of the same coin). If these counter-revolutionary remarks were really left unchecked, wouldn’t it damage the association’s image in front of the masses? Wouldn’t it disappoint those masses who are watching the association? Chairman Mao said, “To overthrow a regime, one must first create public opinion, one must first do ideological work. This applies to the revolutionary class as well as the counter-revolutionary class.” If the association really acted that way, wouldn’t it objectively help the counter-revolutionary forces to sabotage the revolution? According to you, during the 1950s and 1960s when Soviet revisionists launched a frenzied anti-China campaign opposing socialist China, should the Chinese Communist Party, which upheld the correct line, not have written the “Nine Critiques of the Soviet Communist Party” to refute their various fallacies?

Secondly, your statement also somewhat downplays the petty-bourgeois right-wing counter-revolutionaries. Now the association merely opposes addiction to electronic opium, yet it has already attracted such a furious attack, insult, and curse from some counter-revolutionaries. When the revolution really starts, won’t they become even more rampant? At that time, they will really put their words into action! Strategically despising the enemy, they are indeed a group of parasites living off others and waiting for death; they will perish in a few years. Tactically valuing the enemy, we must also recognize that the current Chinese revisionist government they rely on has not yet collapsed, and counter-revolutionary forces are still rampant. If we do not fight back against their words, it will objectively have the effect of sabotaging the revolution as mentioned above.

6 Likes

This person openly publishes revolutionary theories and comrades’ diaries on a Nazi video platform for amusement and insult, and has garnered hundreds of thousands of views on Bilibili. Should we just stand by and do nothing? Moreover, this person is so arrogant as to loudly call on other fascists to report the forum, which could pose a danger to the forum. Faced with such reactionary fascists, shouldn’t we publicly expose their ugly faces and make the forum’s stance clear?

6 Likes

So why should we care about this kind of thing on the bourgeois Bilibili? Bilibili is basically a whole set designed specifically for teenagers, similar to Douyin. It is recommended not to watch these short videos as they are addictive. It was already proven during the pandemic that short videos damage the brain and impair memory.

1 Like

This fascist Brown Bear not only plagiarizes theoretical articles from the association to gain traffic for himself, but also takes other people’s school diaries as capital to gain traffic (which undoubtedly puts the authors at risk of being exposed). His actions are becoming increasingly rampant and unscrupulous. How can we just sit back and do nothing? Are we really going to “listen to incorrect arguments without disputing them, even hear the words of counter-revolutionaries without reporting them, remain calm and act as if nothing happened” and “not resent, advise, stop, or explain when seeing actions that harm the interests of the masses, but just let them be”?

13 Likes

This is a serious political struggle issue; why do you simplify it to a matter of whether or not to watch short videos?

5 Likes

According to what you said, why overthrow capitalism? Why completely bury the revisionism in China? Marxists have never tolerated the phenomenon of people oppressing people in this world, nor tolerated the dregs of the exploiting class. Now that it has appeared, it should be immediately criticized and overthrown, rather than continuing to tolerate it misleading more people. If even this cannot be done, then there will be even less support for violent revolution, and it may even lead to the path of counter-revolution.

2 Likes

The kind of neutral and detached remarks you make are indeed very off-putting. They seem to take no stance, but in reality, they show that you are not siding with everyone else. When counter-revolutionaries are rampantly attacking the forum, even maliciously mocking and digging into the diaries of forum members and exposing their privacy, why are you still so indifferent? If you truly considered yourself a member of the forum, you definitely wouldn’t behave like this.

You also suggest not to spam short videos. By saying this, are you implying that forum members are still watching short videos? Haven’t you seen that the forum has long clearly stated its opposition to the bourgeois spiritual opium and that everyone is fighting against it?

8 Likes

At the same time, it should be specially noted here that there is clearly a section in the forum called “Labor Diary,” which records numerous instances of forum members struggling against capitalists. However, these reactionary fascists do not mention it at all and loudly accuse the forum of being “internet leftists.” This shows that they are very guilty in their hearts. They clearly know that the forum is constantly struggling against the bourgeoisie, but deliberately ignore it for their own personal interests, using a few articles criticizing games to scare the wavering elements among the petty bourgeoisie. It is truly despicable and shameless!!!

25 Likes

Indeed, he would not bring up your struggle against the capitalists.

9 Likes

The actions of Brown Bear indicate that this person is “only class prejudice without thought, only vanity without conscience.”

16 Likes

There are many articles on the forum criticizing various social phenomena and attacking the evils of capitalism. Brown Bear does not repost those but only reposts criticisms of games; there are many articles written by association editorial departments with deep Marxist theoretical levels, but Brown Bear does not repost those either, only reposting superficial articles written when the 1967 ideology was still immature. To find an article that can both spark discussion and be used for his own slander, Brown Bear really went to great lengths. It’s unclear how long he searched the forum, but the reading time must have been considerable.

This also shows that Brown Bear is extremely hypocritical. He says he wants to protect minors and protect the country, so he opposes the association; but in reality, he just wants to use the association’s articles to gain traffic and attract attention for his own profit. So after seeing the video reposting criticism of PVZ go viral, he immediately continued reposting others, and the video titles and descriptions are all for fun and to grab eyeballs. He completely treats the association and the forum as tools for his own personal gain! This is a carnival staged by a group of petty-bourgeois right-wingers who suppress the association through public opinion (it is precisely because of the suppression by the revisionists that the association’s Bilibili account has been repeatedly banned, making it impossible to engage in open debates on Bilibili)!

What is most infuriating is that he reposted the school diary written by Beifeng with a mocking and insulting title! This perfectly ties in with the videos he posted in the past. What he posted before were all “prison big” type fascist thoughts that only seriously right-wing petty bourgeois would make for fun, all hellish jokes. Now, for a child brave enough to engage in ideological struggle and publicly share his life, he directly mocks him! Something like “XXTV”—in the past, only those who would use this style of title were sadists who called cat abuse “cat love TV,” and fascists who took pleasure in abusing children in internet addiction rehabilitation schools with titles like “Lover TV.” Such people have no kindness or sympathy at all. This group of online right-wingers think they are so righteous and glorious, but in reality, they are just a bunch of rotten, stinking maggots gathered together!

16 Likes

Moreover, Brown Bear released a commemorative video about the Indian Communist Maoist, and I found it hard to hold back watching it. How come the apparent stances are no longer fixed? When criticizing us, they say they want to protect the country, but the Indian Communist Maoist also opposes Chinese revisionism and bourgeois pornographic culture, so why is there no opposition to the Indian Communist Maoist at this time? And if posting a video online and talking big doesn’t count as “Internet Left,” then why is the association that truly carries out public opinion propaganda called “Internet Left”? Those who insult the association as people who just talk empty words seem to be insulting themselves.
In fact, this also reveals the hypocrisy of the so-called “Internet Left.” They usually shout revolution loudly, but when faced with truly revolutionary organizations, they take the side of the counterrevolutionaries. Now, there is a phenomenon that has never appeared before: pinks (royalists), the left circle (nominally anti-Chinese revisionism), and liberals (anti-Communist) have all “united” under the banner of opposing the association. In the comment section of the video of the article criticizing PVZ reposted by Brown Bear, all three types of people appear. Because the Proletarian Liberation Struggle Association is a truly Marxist organization, it has now become a mirror that reveals demons, exposing all reactionaries.
This phenomenon is linked to another phenomenon, namely the gradual merging of the left circle and male chauvinism. In recent years in Chinese society, more and more people advocating male chauvinist rhetoric also use so-called “leftist” political terms, even quoting mentor quotes. They pose as the oppressed, waving the banner of resisting oppression, launching a rampant attack on women who already have low political and economic status in this patriarchal society. The left circle, in its original meaning, contains some anti-Chinese revisionism elements. Since China’s economic crisis began to erupt with the pandemic, a large number of petty bourgeoisie have gone bankrupt, feeling confused about their own way out, beginning to think about social issues and coming into contact with Marxist thought; but because they are immersed in capitalist culture, they are unwilling to engage in true ideological struggle, treating Marxism as a fashionable slogan or phrase to shout for personal gain. The reason the left circle is called the left circle is that it is not truly leftist but merely a petty bourgeois group playing with revolution as a trendy term. If in the earliest left circle there were many who sought personal liberation, were dissatisfied with society, and truly had revolutionary thoughts, now after several years of development, the left circle has increasingly “fermented,” becoming a right-wing group that completely treats Marxism as a tool for personal gain. In the past, many left circle people, under the banner of Marxism and the “family, private, state” slogan, claimed to promote women’s liberation to deceive oppressed women’s trust, then indulged in rampant promiscuity, which is a classic example. Because the left circle group stubbornly defends their bourgeois views on love and the interests of bourgeois pornographic culture, they can only become the reactionary and conservative faction among the petty bourgeoisie. The capitalist society of Chinese revisionism is more beneficial than harmful to them, so their opposition to Chinese revisionism is fake rather than real. In the past, some left circle people even combined the image of revolutionary mentor Lenin with rapist Dong Zhimin’s head, promoting Dong the thief as a spiritual leader! On the other hand, the royalist little pinks, in order to maintain Chinese revisionism’s rule, label all forces opposing Chinese revisionism as “foreign forces” and label spontaneously resisting patriarchy feminist thought as “extreme feminism.” Liberals are nothing more than the bourgeoisie who have not yet come to power but will implement even more reactionary fascist policies once they do. These three types of people, because of their selfishness, have come together under the communist mirror of the association. The left circle that once said it wanted to overthrow Chinese revisionism has now begun to attack the association as “illegal fundraising,” “extreme feminism,” and “foreign forces”! It can be said that whether one now acknowledges the truth of women’s liberation is the touchstone of true or false Marxism and true or false revolutionary factions.

14 Likes

Probably this “Brown Bear” is uneducated and has never read the documents of the Communist Party of India (Maoist), and does not know that the Communist Party of India (Maoist) also opposes pornography.

2 Likes

This situation also coincides exactly with what is recorded in “The Communist Manifesto”: To conduct a sacred crackdown on this ghost, all forces of old Europe, the Pope and the Tsar, Metternich and Kise, the French radicals and German police, united. It shows that although reactionaries are outwardly divided and argue fiercely, their fundamental class interests are the same, which is to oppose communism and oppose the people!

6 Likes

The online left circle is like this: when the bourgeois culture is criticized even slightly, it is treated as a grave insult, indulging in bourgeois spiritual opium, and shamelessly claiming “not truly left.” A person cannot support capitalism in life but oppose capitalism politically; this “brown bear” is exactly what he calls himself—“net left.” But he’s even worse than the typical “net left,” who at least pretends to criticize bourgeois culture to save face; he is openly seeking his own humiliation as a “net left,” so much so that no real “leftist” pays attention to him, only a group of net right clowns gathering in his trash space to party.

15 Likes