This is a record of various conflicts within my school and my activities. Due to family restrictions and punishments, I may not be able to update frequently.
5 Likes
Someone here got suspended from school for a day for playing cards. How should this be evaluated? 
This is just a tactic to scare those students who are afraid they can no longer continue to parasitically speculate.
3 Likes
I had a conflict with Lao Jiu in high school. He said I could go home only if I apologized to him, which I refused, so he let me go home directly—“just as I wanted,” since I didn’t want to be locked up at school anyway. Then after a day or two, Lao Jiu told me to go back to school.
2 Likes
Playing cards got one person expelled? Just one person?!
And isn’t your “one-day dropout” a bit exaggerated? This isn’t really dropping out, right?
1 Like
I misspoke, it means not being allowed to go to school for one day, and at the same time, the boarding qualification will be canceled.
Playing cards and causing such trouble at your school is a bit outrageous, but for students who are not interested in speculation, this is actually a good thing.
4 Likes
Classmate: Why are you rewarding me with a day off?
4 Likes
The Academic Affairs Office is definitely aiming to strengthen authoritarian control and “make an example out of someone,” hoping to scare other students through this approach. Although playing cards itself is not an activity against the school, as a form of entertainment, the school views it as “distracting and detrimental to one’s ambitions” and “not focusing on studies,” thus violating school rules, so they want to suppress it.
5 Likes
, I see, so this kind of measure is used to force other students to focus on speculation, which also fits the nature of my rundown key high school.
I was just about to say, why hasn’t Hanyue posted the school diary yet, and then I saw that it was posted.
1 Like
Complained to my deskmate about education and discussed how terrible the text was, but because I kept talking during class, the pretentious intellectual moved my seat. Damn it.
3 Likes
Unbelievable, so if you put it that way, wouldn’t the contradiction be resolved simply by lowering the difficulty of exams? What about the contradictions between unbalanced and inadequate development?
This has nothing to do with the difficulty of the exam. The college entrance examination system in capitalist exam-oriented education is inherently reactionary; it is designed for academic speculation and to cultivate obedient servants. The idea of “improving by one point to surpass thousands” is just a technical issue related to difficulty, which does not change the reactionary nature of the college entrance examination system itself. The main contradiction in schools is definitely the oppression of students by the capitalist education system, alongside the contradictions among the students themselves.
1 Like
Why haven’t you come out to explain what you did at People’s Square?
2 Likes