[Historical Record] Counter-Revolutionary Political Incident at Tiananmen Square

The Counter-Revolutionary Political Incident at Tiananmen Square

“People’s Daily” Workers, Peasants, Soldiers Correspondent “People’s Daily” Reporter

In early April, in the capital Tiananmen Square, a small group of class enemies under the pretense of commemorating Premier Zhou on Qingming Festival deliberately, systematically, and organizedly fabricated a counter-revolutionary political incident.
They brazenly delivered reactionary speeches, posted reactionary poetry and slogans, distributed reactionary leaflets, and incited anti-revolutionary organizations. Using insinuation and outright reactionary language, they wildly shouted “Qin Shi Huang’s era is over,” openly waved the banner supporting Deng Xiaoping, and crazily directed their attacks at the great leader Chairman Mao, splitting the Central Committee of the Communist Party led by Mao, attempting to reverse the current main direction of the struggle against Deng and the rightist counter-revolutionary overturning, engaging in counter-revolutionary activities.
On April 5th, this reactionary activity reached its peak. Around 8 o’clock, a broadcast propaganda vehicle from the municipal Public Security Bureau was smashed, overturned on the ground, with its body and horn crushed. After 9 o’clock, over ten thousand people gathered at the entrance of the Great Hall of the People. At the peak, the crowd on the square was estimated to be nearly one hundred thousand. Except for a very few troublemakers, the vast majority were passersby and onlookers. Some were around the monument, most concentrated on the west side of the square and at the east gate of the Great Hall of the People.
About ten young people were beaten by troublemakers, their heads swollen with large blood blisters, faces swollen, bleeding. The rioters shouted: “Beat him to death! Beat him to death!” A guard soldier came out to persuade them, but was immediately torn off his badge and cap by the troublemakers, his clothes ripped open, and beaten so that his face was covered in blood. These bad guys also brazenly said: “Who can control this scene? No one in the central authorities can handle it. If the leaders come today, they won’t be able to leave!” The reactionary arrogance was extremely rampant. Many people angrily said: “Since liberation, Tiananmen Square has always been the place where our great leader Chairman Mao reviews the revolutionary masses, and such reactionary incidents are absolutely unacceptable.”
Several hundred workers and soldiers, to defend the Great Hall of the People, lined up and marched into the hall corridor but were cut into several sections by the rioters. These troublemakers kept shouting reactionary slogans, and anyone opposing them was beaten with fists, bloodied and battered. Some were forced to kneel and “confess” at the monument.
At 11:05, many again surged toward the History Museum on the east side of Tiananmen Square. A female comrade came out to persuade them but was immediately dragged away and beaten. At this time, a group of troublemakers surrounded the southeast corner of the square, near the clock tower, smashed the door of a People’s Liberation Army barracks, and occupied the building. Several men with crew cuts, holding semi-conductor microphones, took turns shouting hoarse incitements. Near noon, some rioters announced the establishment of the “Capital People’s Memorial Committee for the Premier.” A bad guy wearing glasses threatened that the Public Security Bureau had ten minutes to respond; if not, they would smash the police department.
At 12:30, the guards on duty at Tiananmen Square lined up to march toward the barracks to defend them. The rioters incited loudly: “The People’s Sons and Daughters stand with the people!” “Being deceived is not a crime!” Subsequently, a Shanghai-registered small car was pushed over and set on fire. Firefighters and guards trying to intervene were blocked, and a fire truck was damaged. These troublemakers claimed that extinguishing the fire was “suppressing the mass movement,” and several firefighters were beaten so badly they bled.
At 12:45, a team of police officers arrived to support but were also attacked and blocked. Several police hats were torn off and thrown into the air by the rioters. Some threw knives and daggers at the police, and several officers were surrounded and beaten.
In the afternoon, the destructive activities of this small group of reactionaries became even more rampant. They burned four vehicles used for duty—delivering water, food, and to the security department. Around 5 p.m., they stormed the barracks again, beating and dragging away the guards at the entrance, smashing the ground-floor windows, and looting everything inside. Radios, quilts, bed sheets, clothes, books, and other items were thrown into fires, and dozens of bicycles belonging to the capital workers and soldiers were destroyed or smashed. The scene was filled with black smoke and the noise of reactionary chaos. The glass of the barracks was almost completely shattered, and they set the building on fire.
The broad revolutionary masses despise this reactionary political incident. However, this small group of bad elements arrogantly claimed: “This is the power of the masses,” and brazenly said: “Now no one can control it; even a regiment or a division is useless.” Their reactionary arrogance was extremely rampant.
See how these reactionary elements, using extremely rotten and decayed reactionary language, maliciously and insidiously attack and slander the great leader Chairman Mao and the leadership comrades of the Central Committee:

“The mournful ghost calls, I cry, the howling wolf laughs, shed blood to sacrifice the hero, raise eyebrows and draw swords from sheaths. China is no longer the China of the past, and the people are no longer fools, the feudal society of Qin Huang has gone forever. We believe in Marxism-Leninism, and let those eunuchs who mutilate Marxism-Leninism go to hell! What we want is true Marxism-Leninism. For the true Marxism-Leninism, we are not afraid to shed our heads and blood, on the day of the Four Modernizations, we will hold grand sacrifices.”

This group of reactionaries, claiming to oppose “Qin Huang” and demanding “true Marxism-Leninism,” is entirely the same as the language in Lin Biao’s counter-revolutionary coup plan “‘571 Project’ Minutes,” which is pure reactionary incitement. These reactionaries direct their spears at the great leader Chairman Mao, at the Central Committee led by Mao, and praise Deng Xiaoping’s counter-revolutionary revisionist line, further exposing their evil purpose of carrying out revisionism and restoring capitalism in China.
During these days, these troublemakers not only wrote reactionary poetry but also posted reactionary leaflets. They praised Deng Xiaoping, attempting to promote Deng as the leader of the Hungarian counter-revolutionary events Nagi. They falsely claimed: “Under Deng Xiaoping’s leadership, the central work has achieved decisive victory,” and “The entire nation is overjoyed.” They also viciously attacked and slandered, claiming: “The recent so-called anti-rightist struggle is the overturning activity of a small group of ambitious people.” These people openly oppose the great struggle led personally by Chairman Mao to counter the rightist overturning, and their reactionary arrogance is extreme.
However, when the reactionaries are rampant, it is also the day of their downfall. They are very isolated and have lost the support of the people. While these bad elements caused trouble, committed crimes, and disrupted, many revolutionary masses courageously stood up to condemn their reactionary acts and fought against them. The workers, soldiers, guards, and revolutionary masses present on the square, working in close coordination, fought bravely to defend Chairman Mao, the Central Committee, Mao’s revolutionary line, and the great capital of socialist motherland.
At 5 p.m., when this small group of bad elements set fire to the barracks again, guards risked their lives to put out the fire. To protect the safety of the Great Hall of the People, over a hundred workers and soldiers were injured, more than ten seriously. Six guards were taken away, and many were injured. The police officers continued to fight at great risk.
The leaders of the Capital Workers and Soldiers Command, in the critical situation of being trapped in the barracks and the fire reaching the second floor, persisted in fighting from the third floor. The telephone operators, in urgent moments, calmly and intelligently reported the situation to the relevant leadership departments.
At 6:30 p.m., after Comrade Wu De’s speech was broadcast, most of the passersby and deceived masses quickly left the square. However, a small group of reactionaries continued to resist stubbornly, posting more reactionary poetry around the Monument to the People’s Heroes.
At 9:30 p.m., after tens of thousands of workers and soldiers received orders from the Beijing Revolutionary Committee, with the cooperation of police and guards, they took decisive measures to implement the dictatorship of the proletariat. The heroic capital militia, full of morale, proudly formed ranks and marched into Tiananmen Square to launch a strong counterattack. They surrounded the remaining troublemakers still committing crimes near the monument, detaining the current offenders and major suspects for investigation.
This small group of vicious troublemakers, faced with the mighty dictatorship of the proletariat, was utterly defeated. One by one, like stray dogs, they cowered on the ground trembling; some hurriedly handed over their knives, triangular blades, and notebooks filled with reactionary poetry; a few criminals who drew knives and attempted to attack were justly punished. The broad revolutionary masses cheered, and the entire city warmly supported and praised the revolutionary actions of the workers, soldiers, police, and guards of the capital.

8 Likes

Now even the revisionist textbooks are wildly affirming that the April Fifth Movement was a revolutionary movement against the Gang of Four. They falsely claim that the Gang of Four prevented the commemoration of Zhou Enlai. Under the banner of commemoration, they were doing counter-revolutionary things. At that time, except for Beijing, counter-revolutionaries in other places also responded by posting reactionary big-character posters, presumably Jiang Qing and Zhang Chunqiao. My doubt lies in the fact that the “will of the people” must be false, but it seems that at that time, the rebels opposing Deng Xiaoping’s faction were the ones rebelling, and the masses of the people did not seem to participate much :thinking:

How did you come to this conclusion? Do you have any evidence? Your statements need to be based on facts.

1 Like

Where did you get this “seems like” from? Could it be something you imagined in your own mind?

1 Like

If the people all opposed Deng Xiaoping, then why was there no opposition to him after he came to power?

No one objects, right? Is there a possibility that the capitalist roaders have been brutally persecuting the revolutionaries and arresting revolutionary masses since the “Zhongnanhai coup”?

1 Like

This post discusses the situation of the capitalist restoration at that time, Han Yue can take a look. However, I feel that Han Yue directly saying “No one opposed Deng Xiaoping’s rise to power” is a bit hard to believe.

2 Likes

You’re also directly separating the反派 (rebel faction) from the masses. The forum has reposted many articles about the deeds of revolutionary figures. You can take a look. Moreover, 寒岳 indeed looks at history with too much palace intrigue, with no regard for the common people, directly saying that it seems the common people didn’t oppose Deng Xiaoping, but there is no specific evidence for that.

4 Likes

Your statement is too abstract. Did the masses support this beast after Deng’s rise to power? Han Yue’s words are completely baseless. It’s just because the capitalist-roaders, after usurping central leadership, launched a large-scale “criticism and denunciation” campaign across the country, persecuting revolutionaries, which prevented the masses’ resistance from being properly led and united to overthrow the Chinese revisionists. You can check this reply

No one objects, right? Then how do you know that no one objects?

I have read it and finally understood. At that time, the majority of the people were opposed to the restoration. Deng Xiaoping and his faction used counter-revolutionary means to deceive the people, but they could not maintain it for long before a rebellion broke out. The reason the people did not overthrow the capitalist roaders at that time was because those who could lead the revolution were either suppressed or bought off, and the spontaneous movements of the masses could not resist the state machinery controlled by the capitalist roaders. We study Marxism to, in the new century, arm the revolutionary forces and unite the people through Marxism to turn history upside down. Chairman Mao said, “If a right-wing coup against the Communist Party occurs in China, I am certain they will not have peace and are likely to be short-lived, because all revolutionaries representing the interests of over ninety percent of the people will not tolerate it.” I have a doubt: Chairman Mao said it would be short-lived, but in fact, it seems to have lasted a long time. How can this issue be explained? :thinking:

My logic is:
Deng Xiaoping = taking the capitalist road = harming the people = the people must oppose = the people must rebel
The people did not rebel = the people did not oppose
My mistake is wrongly equating opposition with revolutionary movement

Actually, there was already the Nanjing incident before the April Fifth Movement, which was also a counterrevolutionary event fabricated under the name of “Mourning Premier Zhou.”

1 Like

This indicates that the counter-revolutionary riots that occurred at that time were by no means isolated, but rather represented an attack on the proletarian dictatorship launched jointly by the bourgeoisie both inside and outside the party, attempting to overthrow socialism.

2 Likes

In fact, the treatment of those involved in the 1976 socialist violence against the Tiananmen counterrevolutionary incident and the treatment of protest crowds by revisionist China during the 1989 June 4th incident clearly illustrate the different nature of the two regimes. During the April 28th incident, many unaware and deceived masses were swept up. Only a small handful of truly vicious counterrevolutionaries were involved. At that time, the main approach was persuasion; ultimately, under the guidance of people’s cadres and public security, most people dispersed. Even though the People’s Liberation Army and public security forces were attacked and blood was shed, there was no mass bloodshed. The remaining ten or so most stubborn counterrevolutionaries gathered in Tiananmen Square, and they could only surrender—these people were not arbitrarily killed but were judged and sentenced according to law, sent to reform through labor if necessary.

In contrast, the 1989 incident was completely different. The troops in Beijing at that time were reluctant to open fire on the crowds, but the mad counterrevolutionary bandit Deng Xiaoping directly ordered his henchmen Yang Shangkun and others to bring in troops from outside (Sichuan) to suppress the Vietnamese counterrevolutionary army, which took nearly two weeks. Once they arrived in Beijing, they began to slaughter the crowds on a large scale. This is also why the June 4th incident actually broke out at the end of May, but it was not until early June that the crowds were “cleared,” arrested, and mass murdered. Deng Xiaoping, this dog and beast, directly ordered fire on the crowds, even to the point of craziness, scheming with the “Surrounding the Three Gates and Blocking the One” conspiracy. According to Han Ding’s “The Great Reversal,” there were many crowds on Tiananmen Square at that time. The heavily armed bandits, driving tanks and armored vehicles, pretended to allow the crowds to “disperse in order,” surrounding Tiananmen Square tightly, then opening a corner for the crowds to exit. As the crowds came out, machine guns were set up at the exit, killing everyone who tried to leave!!
(Attached below is the book “The Great Reversal”)

The Great Reversal—China’s Privatization 1978-1989 (William Han Ding).pdf (919.7 KB)

7 Likes