Comrade, hello. Besides communicating on the forum, do members of the association have other platforms for communication, such as through Telegram or other “legal” forms? The association should also have internal organizations; how do these organizations usually carry out activities? In today’s era and under the current dictatorship, how do you consider underground party building? You may have some doubts about me, but I would like to understand your views on this matter.
No comment
6 Likes
Since others are required to talk about their political background and experiences of ideological changes, and others have done so in the self-introduction section, it is not excessive to ask Fenghuo to also talk about his relevant situation. This refers to equality among comrades. It does not mean that others are open and honest with Fenghuo and the association about their own situations, while the association’s internal personnel are secretive and unwilling or afraid to disclose their true circumstances to others.
The association’s program and the internal situation of the association have already been clearly explained in the program document, you can go and read it. Secondly, if you insist on pretending to be ignorant here and say that we, who have long been well-known in the leftist circles and are also targeted by the revisionist government, should publicly share our experiences, that is somewhat ridiculous.
For people in the forum, after sharing their experiences, if they want to join organizational activities, we can let them appear under a different name later. After all, in the forum’s anonymous environment, no one knows them. But for leftist circles like you and those traitors, our identities have long been known. Repeating each of our specific experiences again would be tantamount to inviting leftist circles to report us to the state security and public security authorities.
Do you think that saying a few neutral words can stir up suspicion against us? I think you are a bit too naive.
2 Likes
Or rather, you wouldn’t be foolish enough to think that someone who openly states on the forum homepage and official documents that they want to overthrow the Zhongxiu government would reveal their own experiences, right?
If we did this just because you said a couple of ridiculous foolish things, then it would be the people who truly have hope for us who would be disappointed.
1 Like
Comrades should be open and honest with each other, but “comrade” is not a cheap term. Those who demand others to be “comrades” yet never hold themselves to the same standard, acting sneakily, will not be treated with the attitude of comradeship.
3 Likes
You are simply attacking with a notion of super-class equality. What equality among comrades? Do you expect to be comrades with someone who knows nothing about you? We do not engage in foolish, pig-like morality. The Paris Commune once adopted such equality for a period, publishing daily meeting records, but this was exploited by Versailles saboteurs to attack, slander, and cause great harm to the Commune. This is the kind of equality you advocate. Your desire to probe into the association’s internal affairs ultimately leads to the same result, doesn’t it? Do you think your trick will succeed? The association’s situation has already been introduced within the Central Revolutionary Committee; not only do you ignore this, but you also manipulate this rhetoric. Do you think this super-class equality theory will have any effect?
4 Likes
Why did the agent get so frustrated when he couldn’t gather any information? We never asked anyone for their security details, yet you, agent, from the very beginning demanded that we expose our life-related security, or else we would be “hypocrites.” You’re just like the kind of person Lu Xun described—a rogue of the exploiting class, crazily standing on the street demanding revolutionaries to come out, and when they do, you behead them. Finally, you add a line like “How can you be so stupid” to wrap it up. This kind of foolish provocation to sabotage us is truly wishful thinking. I suggest the agent first examine how well he is covering up before considering how credible his words are in the eyes of others. After all, in the vast majority of groups, your espionage is intolerable to others.
3 Likes
You’d better put away your ridiculous tactics. I want to ask you, what is your purpose in asking forum members about their experiences in a forum openly opposing the Chinese Communist Party? I think anyone with judgment can see through it. Moreover, you hide yourself so thoroughly that no one knows your true situation. Why are you so secretive? This actually suggests that you are not a “comrade” but rather someone who feels more like a eunuch or a state security agent trying to sabotage.
3 Likes
Saying you have some doubts is not enough, because you are a newly registered user who does not follow the forum rules or introduce yourself. Right from the start, you bombard with questions all related to confidential matters. I can only say that no one will answer you.
2 Likes
If you are comrades, you should be equal to each other. Setting this kind of self-introduction threshold to distinguish positions is very inappropriate and should be reconsidered.
Where is the inequality in self-introduction? Is it unequal for you to let comrades understand your situation? Then I ask you, you are an anonymously registered user asking so many confidential things, and I still can’t know what kind of person you are—is that equality? The self-introduction does not require you to disclose any personal privacy, but to tell about your political background and experiences of ideological changes. Where is the inequality? Is it unequal because you want to hide your class stance?
2 Likes
Can you talk about your political background and the changes in your thoughts?
Do you think using provocation tactics will be effective? We don’t talk about foolish notions of benevolence and morality, and we certainly won’t discuss equality with you when it comes to organizational security issues. It’s even less likely that we would preach any kind of super-class “equality” to someone like you who doesn’t even provide any information about yourself.
The self-introduction system itself is a powerful measure to prevent infiltration, mixing, and opportunists. Not only is there no “inequality” involved, but from the perspective of ensuring the safety of all comrades and the openness of political opinions, it is true equality for all comrades who visit this forum and seek revolutionary truth.
8 Likes
If you find it difficult to explain your change of thoughts to strangers, then you can first read more posts on the forum before considering it. You say that comrades should be equal, so where is the inequality in self-introduction? Using provocation or directly shouting loudly like this is unreasonable.
1 Like
Comrades are certainly equal among themselves, but if you introduce yourself without writing anything and just rely on your mouth, does that make you a comrade? By that logic, Xi Jinping shouting “socialism” and “serving the people” every day would also be a comrade.
4 Likes
What you say is ridiculous. How can you tell if someone is here to sabotage or to learn if you don’t clarify your stance? Is it really enough to just say you’re a comrade to be accepted unconditionally? That would make the revisionists very happy—they could just send a bunch of police over claiming to be comrades and destroy the revolutionary organization.
1 Like
You only ask us to be equal, but you don’t show any sincerity in treating us equally, and your behavior is too strange. We have every reason not to trust you.
2 Likes
To all forum users who are unaware of the situation, this is a private message from a user who just came to me and had this inexplicable conversation. I have turned it into a public post. I believe making this conversation public is necessary to help everyone better understand some people.
13 Likes