On March 26th, the Supreme Procuratorate of Zhongxiu announced the launch of the so-called “special supervision of illegal cross-regional law enforcement and profit-driven law enforcement.” The document was very forceful, claiming that they would “take real action, use tough measures, and see real results,” with very intense wording. Soon after, local governments of Zhongxiu also quickly followed suit, with governments in Suzhou, Chongqing, and others issuing documents to crack down on “illegal cross-regional law enforcement.” These official documents, as usual, are full of nonsense; after removing the superficial language about “upholding judicial fairness and justice,” the only phrase with real practical significance is—“optimize the business environment.”
In recent years, as the political and economic crisis of Zhongxiu has become increasingly severe, all the major sources of revenue that local governments relied on initially have been heavily impacted. The extreme poverty of the working people has led to a significant decrease in income from land transfers, value-added tax, and other revenues dependent on mass consumption, causing local governments of Zhongxiu to increasingly fall into deficit. Many local governments often adopt desperate measures—raising fines to delay the overall outbreak of fiscal crises. Revenue from fines and confiscations is not a clearly quantifiable income; ask yourself, is there anyone who can accurately predict at the beginning of the year how many people will be fined or penalized for violations or crimes over the course of the year? However, many local governments of Zhongxiu had already set their “fine budget revenue” at the start of the year, with some even multiplying this budget several times. It is obvious that achieving such “targets” can only be done through various underhanded means—extorting laborers and private capitalists—hence the term “distant ocean fishing” was born.
The so-called “distant ocean fishing” refers to local law enforcement agencies of Zhongxiu crossing provincial borders to conduct surprise searches on private capitalists from other provinces, fabricating reasons to force these private capitalists to hand over part of the surplus value they have plundered without compensation to the Zhongxiu government. In a country like Zhongxiu, where key sectors of social production are almost entirely controlled by bureaucratic monopoly bourgeoisie, they also hold absolute political dominance. Even private monopolistic capitalists with significant influence over specific sectors, such as Jack Ma, lack the ability to compete with bureaucratic monopoly bourgeoisie. Those private capitalists without monopoly status, with weaker and more dispersed forces, have even less political power. As Zhongxiu plunges into political crises, these private capitalists have also become targets for the bureaucratic monopoly bourgeoisie. Last late autumn, an official from the Chengwu County Market Supervision Bureau in Shandong Province used “participation in pyramid schemes” as an excuse to fine a company called Bak Medical over 25 million yuan. He openly stated that forcing the company to submit was “too simple,” and “by catching a small problem and enlarging it, this enterprise will be finished.” Such incidents are not isolated; cases like “tax arrears traced back thirty years” and “cross-provincial fines” are frequent. Smaller private capitalists operating in Yiwu Commodity City, which are scattered and have small scales, have become prime “fishing grounds” for “distant ocean fishing.” Many external police departments froze bank accounts of merchants operating in Yiwu, forcing some private capitalists to establish “aid centers.” By the end of April 2023, these centers had registered over 13,000 frozen bank accounts involving a total amount of 3.14 billion yuan.
However, although this method can temporarily fill the gaps in local government finances, it only deepens the existing crisis. The worsening economic crisis naturally leads to the bankruptcy of many small and medium-sized private capitalists, who are then absorbed by monopolistic capital. “Distant ocean fishing” accelerates this trend, causing private capitalists to go bankrupt at a faster rate and pushing more people into unemployment. But since the Zhongxiu government has been engaging in “distant ocean fishing” for several years, why is it suddenly loudly declaring to crack down on “profit-driven law enforcement” and “distant ocean fishing” now? In fact, Zhongxiu is attempting to use this method to achieve “economic recovery.” The Keynesian-oriented Zhongxiu government still considers “insufficient investment” as the cause of the economic crisis, believing that promoting capitalists to expand investment and start businesses through various measures can solve the massive unemployment during the crisis. Increased investment and employment can also improve the sluggish sales of goods, thus helping to escape the economic downturn. However, Zhongxiu believes that “distant ocean fishing” will cause many private capitalists to be even more reluctant to invest and operate under the current depression, making economic recovery impossible. Unfortunately, based on such mistaken premises, the illusion of permanently eliminating the economic crisis is unattainable.
First, the Zhongxiu government hopes that cracking down on “distant ocean fishing” and improving the “business environment” will encourage private capitalists to expand investment and pass through the economic crisis. But the root cause of the crisis lies in the fundamental contradictions of capitalism. Expanding private investment will only worsen the social state of production chaos, leading to fiercer competition. The expansion of investment and production scale, under the current situation where the demand that workers can pay for is relatively shrinking, will only cause greater overproduction. Private enterprises will find it hard to sell their products and ultimately face bankruptcy. Second, the emergence of “distant ocean fishing” itself reflects the deeper political crisis of the Zhongxiu government. Since the economic situation has not improved and local government finances remain strained, how can this behavior be ended merely by administrative orders? The Zhongxiu government’s loud declarations to crack down on “distant ocean fishing” are nothing new; last year, they announced multiple special campaigns, and in January of this year, they repeatedly claimed to “protect the legitimate rights and interests of private enterprises,” but all ended in failure. This time, the Supreme Procuratorate’s high-profile action is likely to end just like countless previous attempts to ease political and economic crises—big talk but little action.
4 Likes
The recent data shows that in the first quarter, real estate income has been declining for four consecutive years, forcing reliance on other sources. Personal income tax increased by 7%, while the securities transaction stamp duty grew by 60%.
https://gks.mof.gov.cn/tongjishuju/202504/t20250418_3962244.htm
1 Like
The Chinese distant-water fishing fleet can only allow local governments to make quick money from distant-water fishing; otherwise, the financial operations cannot be maintained.