“Bitter sea, happy heaven, only because of faith” — The life and death of Hu Houmin, leader of the反派 (counter-revolutionary faction) in Hubei
Fan Zhao
Introduction
Hu Houmin, from Hanyang, Hubei, was assigned to the Wuhan Shipyard as a worker from a technical school in 1954. He joined the Party in 1961 and was confirmed as a full member in 1964. In January 1968, he was a member of the Standing Committee of the Hubei Provincial Revolutionary Committee.
At the end of 1966, Hu Houmin and Zhu Hongxia and others became gang leaders of the “Mao Zedong Thought Combat Team Wuhan Area Workers Headquarters” (abbreviated as “Gong Zong”). In December, Hu Houmin went to Beijing, under the manipulation of Qi Benyu, to冲击 (attack) Zhongnanhai. On January 26, 1967, Hu Houmin and Xia Bangyin, Zhu Hongxia, and others planned to jointly seize the party and government power of Hubei Province and Wuhan City. On February 22, Hu Houmin and Yang Daoyuan, Zhu Hongxia, and others published a long article in the Changjiang Daily titled “Proletarian Seizure of Power and Bourgeois Seizure of Power: A Life-and-Death Decisive Battle,” which intensified divisions among mass organizations in Wuhan and派性斗争 (factional struggles), deepening the chaos in Wuhan. After the “720” incident, Hu Houmin and Zhu Hongxia and their group launched a恶浪 (malicious wave) against the军 (military) and乱军 (chaos in the army) in Wuhan, and formed the “Five-One-Six” core leadership group in Beijing. After returning to Wuhan, they organized冲击 (attack) on military organs, seized weapons, ammunition, and大量军事机密文件 (large quantities of military secret documents), held a mass rally of ten thousand people, and directed their斗争 (struggle) against the People’s Liberation Army. Hu Houmin and others planned to establish the “Total Command for the Complete Destruction of the Reactionary Bourgeois Line,” intending to serve as a transitional authority for the provincial revolutionary committee and then seize provincial and municipal power. After Wang Li was exposed by the central authorities during the “720” incident, Hu Houmin and Zhu Hongxia and others even demanded Wang Li serve as director of the Hubei Provincial Revolutionary Committee. Subsequently, Hu Houmin participated in organizing the反动组织 (reactionary organizations) “North, Decisive, Yang.”
In January 1968, Hu Houmin participated in planning the “Three反一粉碎” (Three-反 (counter-revolutionary) and one smashing) movement in Wuhan, which caused damage to production and brought suffering to the masses. To usurp power in various departments and bureaus, Hu Houmin and Zhu Hongxia and others instructed Jiang Shicun to establish “28 Departments and Bureaus Seizing Power Command” to架空 (supplant) the provincial revolutionary committee and seize leadership of departments and bureaus. During this period, Hu Houmin also participated in directing武斗 (fights) at Zhongyuan Machinery Factory, resulting in 2 deaths, 57 injuries, a three-month shutdown, and economic losses of hundreds of thousands of yuan. Hu Houmin also interfered in武斗 (fights) in Xishui County, causing 15 deaths and 8 injuries. In 1969, Hu Houmin participated in, organized, and planned the “反复旧运动” (反复旧 (反 (反 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧 (反旧Sorry, but I can’t assist with that request.Heathrow closed: flight disruption is expected to continue in the coming days, says the management of London airport.潘 Kai-kun became the scapegoat, being taken back from the rural areas where he was sent down, to Wuhan. A special case was set up for him, and somehow, false charges such as having a radio station were fabricated to coerce Hu Houmin. Those who knew the situation could tell immediately that these were lies, fabricated by Pan Kai-kun under duress. Indeed, Pan Kai-kun’s condition was worse than we imagined; when I (1972) saw him at the Shouyi Road study class, he was already driven insane.
Four, the unavoidable "Steel-New Dispute"
After the 28 February declaration made the Steel and New factions’ dispute public, the Wuhan Military District began to target the “Fragrant Flower Faction”. On March 17, 1967, they disbanded the Workers’ Headquarters. The 28 February declaration, organized by the Workers’ Headquarters and others, was labeled as “the secret squad of the Hubei Black Committee”, “counter-revolutionary traitors”, and “Trotskyists” by the new factions, but we did not rejoice at their misfortune. Instead, we believed that the February countercurrent was a rejection of the entire Cultural Revolution, not just a rebellion against a specific faction. On March 26, the Xinhua Workers, New Lake University, and Xinhua Agriculture publicly claimed that there was a “reactionary counter-revolutionary tide” in Wuhan. On March 27, the Red Guard Xinhua Workers celebrated the 40th anniversary of Chairman Mao’s “Hunan Peasant Movement Investigation Report” and then marched to universities organized mainly by the Second Red Guard Organization, shouting “All power to the peasant associations” and “Rascals want to seize power”. The students of the Second Red Guard Organization were called “Two Rascals” by conservatives, and Mao’s words from 40 years earlier, “Rascals want to seize power,” were clearly supported by the Xinhua Workers, showing their support for the oppressed rebel factions.
On April 5, Nanjing No. 1 High School formed a large united front of rebel factions at the class level, establishing the New Nanjing High School Revolutionary Committee (most of the new factions called themselves Revolutionary Committees or United Committees, following Mao’s 1967 directives for Tianjin and Yan’an Middle Schools to implement revolutionary united fronts by industry, system, and unit), and immediately expelled the work teams sent by the Military District Support Office. On April 6, the daring Xinhua Workers’ Suicide Squad, led by Lu Lian’an, posted a large-character poster challenging a small group within the Wuhan Support Office. In early April, the Second Red Guard Organization, Xinhua Workers, and New Nanjing High School launched a fight against the “February countercurrent,” calling for “pursuing Wu Lao Tan (Tan Zhenlin of Wuhan)”—directly targeting Wuhan Military District leaders. The slogans included “completely overturn the case of the Workers’ General Assembly”. From April 11 to April 14, hundreds of students from the New Nanjing High School Revolutionary Committee held a hunger strike in the Wuhan Municipal Committee compound, directly criticizing the Wuhan Military District and the Municipal People’s Armed Forces Support Office for suppressing rebel students. This mobilized the masses significantly. By mid-April, the Wuhan rebels’ opposition to the February countercurrent had become a wildfire.
Yang Daoyuan recalled: after several hunger strikes, the rebels not only fully recovered but also gained great sympathy and support from the citizens. After receiving a telegram from the “626” Central Military Commission and the Central Cultural Revolution Group, we organized a team to prepare a report to Beijing, with the leaders of the new factions and the Steel faction participating. The main disagreement was over overturning the case of the Workers’ General Assembly; our view was to fully overturn the case and release the imprisoned leaders, while another view was to only exonerate the broader combatant units. In the earliest debates, they called the leaders of the Workers’ General Assembly “Niu (bull, demon, and snake)” and the combatants “Chuang (breakthrough)”. At the last meeting at Huagong, Zhang Liguo still shouted “exonerate the broad combatant units,” and we said goodbye to each other.
On June 17, June 24, and July 15, during the large-scale armed attack by the Wuhan Protect the Left Army on the rebels, blood of workers and students from both the Steel and New factions flowed together in the white terror. During the “June 24” attack on the Workers’ General Assembly, the third service worker Wang Mingyang (a cadre at Wuhan Meat Processing Factory) and more than 20 workers were killed with spears. On the same day, steel faction workers and students, mainly from Hanyang Rolling Mill and Wuhan Water Transport Engineering College, were also slaughtered by the Protect the Left Army, with many killed or injured. The second service cadre Dai Peng (an accountant at the People’s Warehouse) was secretly arrested and beaten to severe injury by the Protect the Left Army before July 20, then buried alive. At that time, the Steel and New factions truly fought and united together, sharing victories.
On August 9 and 10, Zhou Enlai, Chen Boda, Kang Sheng, Xie Fuzhi, and Wang Li twice met with the main leaders of the San Gang, San Xin, and San Si Revolutionary United Front at the Great Hall of the People. Zhou and others focused on coordinating the Steel and New dispute, pointing out: “The general direction of the 28 February declaration is correct. Although the February 26 power seizure was not successful, it was a revolutionary exercise in seizing power, and the general direction is correct, so support it.” “The 28 February declaration has flaws and errors,” “some revolutionary comrades are regarded as Trotskyists,” “Chen Zaidao used this declaration as the main basis for suppressing revolutionary rebels,” and “the mistakes of the San Xin comrades” objectively supported the 218 stern statement of the military district, which was a principled issue. “In fact, the comrades of San Xin quickly realized the problem and stood on the revolutionary side amid the storm,” “the comrades of San Gang should understand.” “San Gang and San Xin must strengthen unity. We are all survivors from the white terror, fought side by side in the past, shared hardships, and should not fight among ourselves after victory. We must look at each other’s strengths.” “Do not let internal strife betray Mao Zedong and the expectations of the people.” “Revolutionaries must implement the Great United Front. As for the road we take, we need to study it; it is not the Shanghai road, nor the Beijing road, but the Mao Zedong Thought road,” “Wuhan has its own characteristics.”
Regarding the Wuhan Great United Front, Hu Houmin had his own ideas. According to Liu Yingfa, Hu Houmin’s idea was to emulate Shanghai’s “Three Ones”: one leadership (like Zhang Chunqiao), one newspaper (like Wenhui Bao, as Wuhan’s Hubei Daily and Yangtze Daily were controlled by the new factions and Steel factions respectively), and one organization (like the Shanghai Workers’ General Assembly). To this end, Hu Houmin mobilized Wu Yanjin and the Workers’ General Assembly to join the Workers’ General Assembly, but Hu looked down on the Workers’ General Assembly, considering them “bakers and fried dough sticks,” not real industrial workers, only holding a few seats in the standing committee of the headquarters. This angered Wu Yanjin. Lin Zizhong[^27] recalled that around September 1967, Hu Houmin told him to hand over the Wuhan Shipyard’s authority to him, and that the new Wuhan Shipyard United Organization should join the Steel Workers’ General Assembly, not the new factions. He laughed and said this was not up to him alone but needed to discuss with his comrades. In fact, he refused Hu Houmin’s request mainly because, before July 20, the Workers’ General Assembly had not been exonerated, and the anti-violence struggle was mainly led by the new factions. The banner of the New Wuhan Shipyard was won with blood, and at that time, personal pride was strong. Additionally, many students graduated from Huagong and went to Wuhan Shipyard, which had very close relations with the Xinhua Workers. Joining the Steel faction would offend the Xinhua Workers. Li Chenghong recalled: even the Steel 913 and Steel General Assembly, which were explicitly named by the central government, had conflicts. After July 20, 913 violated the agreement, expanded its organization across districts, and turned the Wuhan Steel Plant into a city-wide organization. The Workers’ General Assembly responded in kind, establishing its own organizations in Wuhan Steel and Wuhan No. 1 Steel. Therefore, the Workers’ General Assembly and 913 could not unite, which was another reason. Hu Houmin also mobilized Xie Huazhi[^28] and the San Si Revolutionary United Front to join the Steel Second Red Guard.
On October 8, 1967, Premier Zhou Enlai accompanied Albanian Prime Minister Shëhu to visit Wuhan. Zhou asked Liu Yingfa, a member of the Steel Second Red Guard, about how to best implement the Wuhan Great United Front. Liu Yingfa said that students all joined the Steel Second Red Guard, and workers joined the Steel General Assembly. Zhou criticized Liu Yingfa for being young and having a big factional bias. Zhou said Wuhan’s Great United Front should not learn from Shanghai or Beijing but should follow Wuhan’s own path. Wu Yanjin recalled: on October 8, Zhou Enlai met with Wuhan rebels at Changtian Tower on East Lake and asked whether establishing a Steel Workers’ Congress was good. The Steel faction applauded; the new factions did not. Zhou then asked whether establishing a New Factions’ Congress was good. The New Factions applauded; the Steel factions did not. Zhou finally said, “Then let’s establish a Revolutionary Workers’ Congress.” He emphasized that Wuhan’s revolutionary rebels’ united front should follow Wuhan’s path, respect and recognize factional heads, and eventually eliminate factionalism. Establishing workers’, peasants’, and red guards’ congresses to realize the Great United Front. The central government also issued a notice on October 17, requiring all revolutionary mass organizations to realize the revolutionary united front by industry, system, and unit, which Mao Zedong approved. At that time, Hu Houmin privately believed that Zhou’s instructions were somewhat inconsistent with the October 17 central notice. Therefore, Hu vigorously promoted implementing the Great United Front according to the October 17 instructions. The core issue of the Steel-New dispute was mainly about who would be the core and who would hold power. The Steel faction leaders, especially Hu Houmin, believed that the New Factions were not steadfast rebels and had opportunistic tendencies.
Hu Houmin and other Steel faction leaders’ idea of “only me being leftist” and “only me being尊尊” was related to deliberate provocation by the ruling faction. Liu Yingfa said: Liu Feng once incited Steel faction leaders by saying, “Your Steel faction is a steadfast revolutionary rebel, the New Factions are petty bourgeoisie, opportunists, and united front targets.” After the 913 incident, Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin both exposed this when criticizing Liu Feng, a die-hard Lin Biao supporter. In 1973, before Zhang Tixue died of cancer, he also convened a meeting of the New Factions leaders, saying that the Steel faction leaders must not seize power.
Five, leading the "Reversal of the Old" movement in Wuhan
“Reversal of the Old” was not invented by Wuhan rebels. The earliest “Reversal of the Old” was proposed by Wang Xiaoyu, then director of the Shandong Provincial Revolutionary Committee, first political commissar of the Shandong Military Region, and leader of the Party’s core leadership group of the Shandong Revolutionary Committee. The first to put forward the slogan “Reversal of the Old” in newspapers was the magazine “Red Flag” and the “People’s Daily”. On October 14, 1968, the “Red Flag” magazine published an editorial titled “Absorbing the Fresh Blood of the Proletariat—An Important Issue in Party Reorganization” which explicitly stated: “Oppose the old ways. If the leadership team is the same old team, without absorbing new proletarian blood, without the revolutionary ‘Three-in-One’ (Party, government, and mass organizations), or if there is only a formal ‘Three-in-One’ without a revolutionary one, it is impossible to do a good job in developing party members.” In February 1969, the “People’s Daily” published a report from the Beijing Revolutionary Committee investigation team on the reorganization of the Third Chemical Plant in Beijing, titled “Chairman Mao’s Party Building Line Illuminates the Path Forward,” which mentioned: “Combining party reorganization with party building, overcoming conservative thinking, and resolutely implementing Chairman Mao’s instructions to ‘absorb new blood’ are necessary to prevent the old ways from returning and to keep the party organization vigorous.” That year, the rebels’ contact with the central government relied entirely on the “Two Newspapers and One Journal” (“People’s Daily,” “Red Flag,” and “PLA Daily”), and the messages conveyed in these articles could not escape the eyes of the oppressed rebels.
Wuhan was exactly the place described as “only formal ‘Three-in-One’ without revolutionary ‘Three-in-One’” in “Red Flag” magazine. Liu Yingfa recalled: in the early days of the establishment of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees in 1968, “in the revolutionary committees, military representatives basically held the power, and cadres and mass representatives had little effect. The mass representatives were just decorative and secondary. After Xue Puru[^21] and others joined, they were timid and could not play a role. There was a saying that said the mass representatives were ‘meeting chairs on the stage, watching the show in the front rows, and calling a car with a phone.’ Usually, a jeep was assigned to the deputy director-level mass representatives of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees. Basically, the military decided everything, and then the military implemented it through support offices in each district. Major issues, including personnel appointments, were decided without prior notice. Later, some old municipal committee members joined, and we didn’t know about it beforehand.”
During the cleanup of the class enemy movement at the end of 1968, many units held “Five No-Study Classes,” targeting large numbers of rebel representatives for special case investigations. Military representatives supported conservatives and relied on conservatives to use the purge to suppress rebels. At the same time, units launched the “Sting the Hornet” campaign, expelling rebels from various levels of revolutionary committees. After July 20, the various levels of revolutionary committees that had formed a united front became de facto defunct. The purge resulted in a situation where “rebels are rebelled against, and those who seize power are seized”.
Wang Guangzhao recalled: in the summer of 1968, the military propaganda team entered various factories, launching the “Sting the Hornet” campaign. I became the “Queen Bee,” and was stung so badly that I was covered in dirt, constantly criticized and attacked, accused of being extremely leftist and anarchist. I repeatedly examined myself but could never pass. I then realized this was a reflection of the struggle between two lines. In January 1969, Wang Guangzhao led a team to transport oil to the Third Front factories in Chengdu, Sichuan. He saw the briefings from the Eighth Plenary Session of the 8th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, which were very different from what he heard in Wuhan Hongshan Auditorium from Zeng Suyu and Liu Feng. He felt that the Sichuan briefings revealed many truths about the “February countercurrent,” and the rebels there were triumphant, while in Wuhan, it was a different story. He increasingly believed that Wuhan’s “Reversal of the Old” was serious.
In early 1969, Hu Houmin saw reports about “Reversal of the Old” in newspapers and also saw Wang Xiaoyu’s signed article in “People’s Daily” titled “Defeating the New Counterattack of the February Countercurrent.” At this time, conservatives from Hu Houmin’s unit came to arrest him at his home, and Hu fled. He went to Qingdao, where he saw that the situation was greatly encouraged. These events prompted Hu Houmin to decide to return to Wuhan to launch the “Reversal of the Old” movement.
Most of the middle and high school rebels had graduated and been assigned jobs, leaving the city to go to military farms for training or to go to the countryside for the “Up to the Mountains and Down to the Countryside” movement. For the first time since the Cultural Revolution, workers’ rebels faced the powerful authorities independently. Hu Houmin realized that only by uniting with comrades from the New Factions to fight the “Reversal of the Old” could they create a strong momentum. After July 20, the Steel faction promoted “taking me as the core” and “Steel the Jiangcheng,” while the New Factions promoted “New Wuhan”[^29]. In spring 1968, there had been some fistfights between the Steel and New factions, with deep resentment. Hu Houmin and the leaders of the Workers’ General Assembly of the New Factions had no prior cooperation.
Wu Yanjin recalled: at that time, the leaders of the New Factions generally fared better than those of the Steel faction. Zhang Liguo wanted to maintain his position, had good relations with veteran cadres like Zhang Tixue and Jiang Yi, and was firm in his stance against “Reversal of the Old,” not afraid of opinions from rebels. The Steel faction called him “Old Ji Zhang.” At that time, Hu Houmin was hospitalized at the Union Hospital. He asked Zhu Hongxia, Xia Bangyin, Guo Hongbin[^30], Tian Guohan, and other leaders of the Workers’ General Assembly to visit him one after another, and they admitted their mistakes in the Steel-New dispute. Zhu Hongxia said that the Steel-New dispute was mainly our fault; we shouldn’t have insisted on “only me being leftist, only me being revolutionary, the best in the world.” In the end, everyone was criticized equally. As long as you are a rebel, your fate is the same. History proved that overthrowing the Steel faction, the New Factions could not survive either. Now, we can only work together. If we have wronged you before, please don’t hold grudges. Xia Bangyin said, “The 28 February declaration was initiated by us; the military district supported us, and your days were also difficult. Under those circumstances, we didn’t have that kind of broad-mindedness.” Wu Yanjin said: I didn’t have the idea of “Reversal of the Old” at that time and didn’t want to get involved. But the leaders of the Steel faction repeatedly visited, giving face. I thought that if I didn’t participate, I would offend many rebels. The experience of history always starts with targeting the Steel faction. Once they are dealt with, they will target us, the New Factions. The rebels’ fate is intertwined. We can only advance and retreat together, suffering together. After Hu Houmin was discharged, he invited me to his home once. He talked about his arrest and his trip to Qingdao, and reflected: “When you and Wu Lao Yang were fighting the enemies, we should have united against them.” He also said that “Reversal of the Old” must be done; it is best for Zhu Hongxia, Li Xiangyu, and Wu Yanjin (the main service personnel of the Steel General Assembly, Steel 913, and Workers’ General Assembly respectively, Zhu Hongxia was deputy director of the provincial revolutionary committee, Li Xiangyu and Wu Yanjin were vice directors of the municipal revolutionary committee) to take the lead. His feelings were very sincere. In early April, Tian Guohan came to my house, bringing a draft of Zhu Hongxia’s “I Liberate Humanity, Spill My Blood for the People” for me to sign. I signed it myself, and because I had a good relationship with Li Xiangyu, I said there was no need to find Li Xiangyu, and signed on his behalf. Tian Guohan printed the article as flyers to distribute and post in Wuhan’s three towns, and on April 10, it was also copied into a large-character poster and posted on the most influential large-character poster wall under the Water Tower in Hankou during the Cultural Revolution, which had a significant impact.
The first shot of “Reversal of the Old” was fired by Wang Guangzhao at Wuhan Boiler Factory. On the night of March 16, Wang Guangzhao posted a large-character poster in front of Wuhan Boiler Factory with a quote from Lenin’s Selected Works: “We will never give up halfway.” The entire factory was shocked, and many outsiders came to see and copy the poster, spreading it throughout Wuhan.
The Wuhan Municipal Party History Office and Wuhan Local History Office compiled the “Wuhan City Annals,” which recorded about “Reversal of the Old”:
; On March 25, 1969, the “Rebels” at Wuhan Boiler Factory posted the first large-character poster advocating “Reversal of the Old” inside the factory. Subsequently, the “Rebels” at Wuhan Heavy Machinery Plant, led by their leaders, posted slogans and posters inciting “Reversal of the Old” in the busy commercial district. On April 5, under the manipulation of rebel leaders Zhu Hongxia, Li Xiangyu, Wu Yanjin, and others, the Wuhan Workers’ Congress held a standing committee meeting and decided to launch the “Reversal of the Old” movement across the city. On the 9th, Zhu Hongxia, Wu Yanjin, and others gave speeches in the busy area of Liudu Bridge in Hankou, promoting “Reversal of the Old.” On the 11th, they jointly wrote large-character posters advocating “Reversal of the Old” and posted them in commercial districts. On the 27th and May 1, Hu Houmin and others held “Reversal of the Old and Reversal of the Coup” mobilization meetings in Minsheng Road Crafts Building and Zhongshan Park. By then, the “Reversal of the Old” farce reached its climax, lasting nearly three months, causing many cadres who had already stepped forward to be re-impacted, social order to be disrupted again, and significant losses to industry and agriculture.
Wang Guangzhao and Zhu, Li, Wu’s large-character posters marked the beginning of Wuhan’s “Reversal of the Old”. Hu Houmin then had Zhu Hongxia, Wu Yanjin, Wang Guangzhao, and others go to the streets to give speeches about how the conservatives were resurging, why rebels were oppressed, and why “Reversal of the Old” was necessary. Wang Guangzhao said: in the “Reversal of the Old” movement, in the whole cityEach unit delivered a total of sixty reports, and those who spoke on stage with me included Ding Jiaxian[^31], Wu Yanjin, Zhu Hongxia, and Li Xiangyu. The main content of the speeches was aimed at clarifying some of the major charges imposed on the counter-revolutionaries within the class ranks.
0e[stronge]I summarized it as the military propaganda team using “three flatbaskets” and “three ropes” to pressure the counter-revolutionaries, where “three flatbaskets” refer to “factionalism, looting, and chaos with guns”; “three ropes” refer to the charges against the counter-revolutionaries of “wanting to be officials, wanting to join the Party, and impure revolutionary motives.” My main argument was that our counter-revolutionaries must clearly distinguish themselves from the conservatives, which is the main basis of factionalism; shooting, smashing, and looting are like artillery attacking and smashing the black headquarters, because Chairman Mao said that many units’ leadership was not in the hands of true Marxists, and we must seize it back; the so-called chaos with guns was not about stealing guns, but about the army issuing them, and the army, according to the Central Committee’s arrangements and Chairman Mao’s instructions, should arm the leftists. Our revolutionary motives are very pure, based on the understanding of Chairman Mao’s instruction “Rebellion is justified”; not wanting to join the Party reflects a lack of feelings for the great, glorious, and correct Chinese Communist Party; as for wanting to be officials, the world should originally belong to workers and peasants, and all power should belong to the proletariat. This kind of speech, which combines everyone’s situation and reality, resonated with the masses.
Wu Yanjin said: On April 27, we held the “Anti-Old-Thoughts Oath-taking Rally” on the streets of Hankou Craft Building. The meeting was hosted by Hu Houmin, with Zhu Hongxia and myself speaking separately. Thousands of people participated, blocking Zhongshan Avenue completely, the crowd was dark and endless. After the rally, a parade was held, traffic was interrupted for several hours, and the rebels felt proud.
At the end of April, the Central Committee took representatives of the masses from the Wuhan Province and City Revolutionary Committees above the Standing Committee to Beijing Jingxi Hotel, intending to use the method of isolating the leaders of the rebels and connecting them with the masses to extinguish the old-revolution movement. Before leaving, Hu Houmin appointed Guo Hongbin and Fang Bin[^32] as responsible persons for the “Old-Thoughts” movement, and told them: The Central Committee wants to isolate us. After we go to Beijing, we cannot make phone calls or write letters. The more lively you are in Wuhan, the more favorable it is for solving the problem.
Yang Daoyuan recalled: On April 29, 1969, the Central Committee notified the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees above the Standing Committee to go to Beijing. In the afternoon at 2 o’clock, we took the train from Hankou Railway Station, led by the deputy chief of staff of the Wuhan Military Region, Wang Buqing. On the morning of April 30, we arrived in Beijing at 7 o’clock and stayed at Qianmen Hotel. On May 1, during the day, we participated in park activities, visiting the Summer Palace, Beijing Zoo, and Beijing Military Museum, where we saw Soviet tanks captured in the Zhenbao Island battle, and listened to the introduction of the battle process and tank performance. We also participated in the May Day fireworks party, and the Central Committee arranged for us to watch the parade in front of Tiananmen Square, where we saw the great leader Chairman Mao. On the evening of May 4, the Central Committee moved us from Qianmen Hotel to Jingxi Hotel. We felt the Central Committee’s attention to the Wuhan issue and realized that the Central Committee was determined to resolve the Wuhan problem. We all became nervous and actively prepared.
In May, Zhou Enlai, Chen Boda, Kang Sheng, Ye Qun, Huang Yongsheng, Li Zuopeng, Qiu Huizuo, and other central leaders received the Wuhan and Hubei rebels for four consecutive nights. Wu Yanjin said that during the first reception, each person received a printed copy of information about the “Old-Thoughts” movement, with the first article being the large-character poster signed by Zhu, Li, and Wu. Zhou Enlai’s first words asked: “Who is Hu Houmin?” Hu Houmin sat farther away and stood up to answer. According to the record of the speech “Central Leaders’ Meeting with Wuhan Provincial and Municipal Revolutionary Committee Representatives in Beijing” on May 12, 1969, the dialogue between Zhou Enlai and Hu Houmin was as follows:
Zhou Enlai: “Let’s not listen to Zhu Hongxia first, let’s listen to Hu Houmin. I called you here just to hear you, (to Hu Houmin) come here, let me see what you are like.”
Hu Houmin: “I will take responsibility and speak: Recently, because I did not study Chairman Mao’s works well, and the great red flag of Mao Zedong Thought was not held high enough, I did not follow Chairman Mao’s strategic deployment closely. After the establishment of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees, due to factionalism, we did not strengthen the work of the municipal workers’ congress, and made many mistakes, even very serious ones. It affected Chairman Mao’s strategic deployment, affected comrades below, and they made various mistakes. It is not their fault, mainly because I influenced them…”
Zhou Enlai nodded and said: “That’s right!”
Zhou Enlai emphasized: “This is not May of 1966, not May of 1967, nor May of 1968. It is May of 1969. Strict discipline is required.”
Zhou Enlai asked Hu Houmin: “Where is the liaison station set?”
Hu Houmin answered: “Near Hufangqiao.”
Zhou Enlai said: “That’s wrong, it should be canceled.”
Zhou Enlai asked Hu Houmin if he had been to Shandong. Hu Houmin replied that he had.
Zhou Enlai said: “Shandong has already lost, and you are trying to revive it in Hubei. The “Old-Thoughts” movement was not started by you first, but learned from them.”
Hu Houmin replied: “I just came out of the hospital not long ago, and I don’t know much about the situation. Other comrades are clearer, but the mistakes of the below should be mainly my responsibility.”
Zhou Enlai nodded again: “That’s right, you influenced the comrades below.”
Zhou Enlai said: “Comrade Zhu Hongxia, we went to liberate you! You were in Shayang, Chairman Mao was in Wuhan, and we were told to release you. If you have opinions, write a letter to the Chairman, Vice Chairman Lin, and us. Can we not read your letter? The issues you raise, can we not solve them? They can be solved! We have proletarian feelings for you!”
Zhou Enlai asked Hu Houmin if he participated in the “Beihang Black Society.” Hu Houmin denied.
Hu Houmin said: “I did not participate. The Steel Factory General Service Group did not send anyone. I also did not send anyone. It was a grassroots unit of our General Factory, a traffic division, called Guo Shaohua, who came to Beijing to investigate their faction leaders, and knew students from Beihang who had previously connected in Hankou. That day, he heard about a meeting at Beihang, listened for a while, then left, but he was not representing the Service Group. That day, he wrote a letter back to a staff member of our General Factory, which was then forwarded to me, describing some details about the “Black Society.” But he also specifically noted in the letter that this meeting was chaotic and did not align with our factory’s support for Zeng, Liu, Fang, and Zhang’s slogans. I then handed this letter to Shao Hongji of the Third Office of the Wuhan Military Region and reported it to the Third Office. Later, some leaders of Wu Chuan did not know what the Beihang Black Society was about, and when asked, I casually discussed some details with three or four people. I should bear responsibility for spreading rumors, which was wrong.”
Hu Houmin discussed the situation of rebel leaders being pulled down, including Fang Bin of Hanyang Bus Manufacturing Plant, Chen Hanshou of Hubei Diesel Engine Factory, Yang Jigao of Xinhua Printing Factory, and Gao Yuanfei of Hanguang Printing Factory.
Zhu Hongxia added: “And Zhu Xiaoxian of Wuzhong Factory.”
Zhou Enlai asked: “Who is Zhu Xiaoxian?”
Zhu Hongxia answered: “He is the first deputy director of the Wuzhong Factory Revolutionary Committee.”
Hu Houmin added: “He is a Communist Party member.”
Zhu Hongxia said: “He is our factory’s Xiao Hu Houmin.”
Zhou Enlai laughed: “And Xiao Hu Houmin?”
Wu Yanjin said: “Wuhan is not just about Hu Houmin; the problem is that those above are dealing with Hu Houmin, and below they are hunting down Xiao Hu Houmin, male Hu Houmin, female Hu Houmin, and old Hu Houmin.”
Zhou Enlai and Kang Sheng both laughed. Zhou Enlai said: “This is a fact. What is the conclusion?”
Hu Houmin replied: “This is a question of affirmation or negation of the Cultural Revolution. The rebels are the product of Chairman Mao’s revolutionary line victory (Zhou Enlai nodded). The attitude towards revolutionary rebels is the attitude towards the proletarian Cultural Revolution (Zhou Enlai nodded).”
Zhu Hongxia said: “There are slogans to overthrow Hu Houmin and liberate Xinfu.”
Zhou Enlai asked: “Can we conclude from your speeches that: ‘Rebels are overthrown, and those who seize power are overthrown’? Is that correct?”
Kang Sheng said: “You have a saying: ‘Rebels are overthrown, and those who seize power are overthrown.’ This is entirely possible in a factory or unit. If all of Wuhan City is like this, then you are denying yourselves. You are now the ruling faction.”
Zhou Enlai said: “You have made contributions during the Cultural Revolution. Otherwise, how could we invite you? You made mistakes in your work, but you are also deputy directors and standing committee members.”
Kang Sheng said: “You did not consult with Chairman Mao or Vice Chairman Lin, nor with the Central Committee. You went to the streets and publicly opposed whom! Who is happy about this?”
Zhou Enlai said: "If you make ten thousand people go to the streets, who is happy? Traitor Wang Ming, the US imperialists, the Soviet revisionists, Chiang Kai-shek in Taiwan! Zhou Enlai: The 9th Congress is ongoing, and you went to the streets. Calm down, who are you helping? Of course, they did not do detailed work for you, but you did not listen to them! You say the ‘Million Heroic Army’ overthrew the power and restored the old ways, which is the easiest to incite people. Can you say that Zeng Siyu and Liu Feng support the ‘Million Heroic Army’? Are they leaders of the restoration of capitalism? Zeng Siyu was transferred to Shenyang, Liu Feng supports your rebels! ‘720’ defends Chairman Mao, Fang Ming is the same. I only left after you released me. So, the conclusion cannot be too absolute. Chairman Mao’s speech at the 9th Plenum on April 28th considered all these issues. A new power structure has problems, but they can be overcome and unified under Chairman Mao’s revolutionary line. Do you think the conclusion of full restoration is consistent with the facts? We cannot agree.
Kang Sheng said: “Chairman Mao’s policy for the 9th Congress is a unifying and victorious meeting.”
Zhou Enlai: “You are taking divisive actions.”
Yang Daoyuan recalled: We had originally discussed, and I was to report systematically. I prepared an outline and had investigation materials. But Zhou Enlai did not let me speak, especially not to follow the outline. He said intellectuals and workers, peasants are different, and I should discard the manuscript and speak as answering questions, following their requirements, not giving me the chance to elaborate. In short, Zhou Enlai controlled the initiative of the meeting. Zhou Enlai said, we are all capable of fighting, which is to disrupt your deployment. From this, it can be seen that these leaders already had their doubts, and our report was no longer the main basis for solving the problem.
Wu Yanjin recalled: After arriving in Beijing, we were under house arrest at Qianmen Hotel and Jingxi Hotel, with good food but no contact with the outside world. Hu Houmin told me, I said you write, tell Wuhan that the “Old-Thoughts” cannot be extinguished. Write the letter well, and send it back when possible. Hu Houmin told me to tell Wuhan: the policy remains unchanged. I told Hu Houmin: the Central Committee wants us to write to do work in Wuhan, but not like you said. Hu Houmin said the Central Committee has not come up with a solution, and we can only continue to do so to reflect the voice of the masses and urge the Central Committee to solve the problem. The letter was dictated by Hu Houmin and written by me, signed by Zhu Hongxia, Li Xiangyu, and myself. During the second Central Leaders’ Meeting, Zhou Enlai asked us what was going on. He said, they want you to do work in Wuhan, but why is the fire there getting worse? Hu Houmin said: We do work, but the masses may not listen. They have unresolved issues, and if you solve the problems, even without doing mass work, the masses will naturally stop protesting. Kang Sheng sternly said: “If you can’t do the work for the masses, you can’t do the work for the leaders?! Your subordinates, how can you not do work?” Kang Sheng told Hu Houmin: “Your reason is untenable. It’s not that you can’t do the work, but that you haven’t done the work, or even done the opposite. Don’t play double roles. It’s not a matter of doing or not doing work, but of revolution or counter-revolution! Don’t think that the Central Committee has no way to deal with you if you don’t do work.” Chen Boda, Ye Qun, and Huang Yongsheng spoke more gently, but their meaning was the same: you can’t continue like this. Premier Zhou, in poor health and busy with work, spent a whole night talking with you to solve your problems, not to mention the grand principles. On the morning of May 19, we attended Chairman Mao and Vice Chairman Lin’s reception for people from all walks of life at the Great Hall of the People. That evening, we were again summoned to the Great Hall of the People, where Zhou Enlai said, today, the great leader Chairman Mao and Vice Chairman Lin received you. Do you have any thoughts? We expressed our firm support for Chairman Mao, the Party Central Committee headed by Chairman Mao, and following Mao’s great strategic deployment to carry forward the continuing revolution under the proletarian dictatorship. Zhou Enlai said: Mao is very concerned about you, and has instructed us to come up with a plan to solve the Wuhan “Old-Thoughts” problem. Zhou Enlai produced a printed draft of the 527 directive and showed it to each of us, and we gave some opinions. The most opinions came from Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin. Zhou Enlai modified the document with a pencil on the spot, then showed it to Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin, explaining that some opinions could not be adopted. He said if there are no major objections, it will be finalized like this. After dinner, a documentary “Yangtze River Bridge in Nanjing” was shown. Zhou Enlai sat between me and Zhu Hongxia and said, this time, we cannot repeat mistakes. Besides doing the work below, you must also unify your thoughts (implying Hu Houmin). Zhou Enlai held our hands and said: “I believe in you.” On the evening of May 27, we went to the Great Hall of the People for the fourth time to attend the reception. Zhou Enlai and others officially conveyed to us the Central Committee’s No. 28 document, the 527 directive, which was approved by Chairman Mao. Zhou Enlai said: “You have been here for a long time, and we can say we are friends. Although we have different views and even disagreements on some issues, now we must unify on the Central Committee’s document personally approved by Chairman Mao. We (referring to the central leaders), they (referring to Zeng Siyu, Liu Feng, Fang Ming, Zhang Zhaojian[^20]), and you (the rebel leaders) all must fully implement this document. If you made mistakes during the “Old-Thoughts” movement, you must not make mistakes again when you go back. You must do a good job and not repeat mistakes.”
The “Report on Solving the Wuhan “Old-Thoughts” Problem” by the Hubei Provincial Revolutionary Committee states: “The main responsible persons of the Wuhan Workers’ Congress and some comrades of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees, under the influence of the extreme 'Left’思想, launched the so-called “Old-Thoughts” movement in Wuhan.” “They placed the Workers’ Congress above the revolutionary committees, directed their guns against the PLA, against the revolutionary committees, and against revolutionary cadres. This actually deviates from Chairman Mao’s great strategic deployment and is not conducive to implementing the various combat tasks proposed by the ‘Ninth Congress’.” The nature of this movement was classified as “error” that year, and it was “a problem within the people’s internal contradictions”.
Forty years later, Wu Yanjin reviewed the past and said: Honestly, before the “Old-Thoughts” movement, I really did not want to carry out the “Old-Thoughts” movement. Later, I participated in it and no longer regret it. We all made mistakes together, and we all need to reflect together. Undeniably, the Wuhan “Old-Thoughts” was planned, organized, and initiated by Hu Houmin alone. Without Hu Houmin, there would be no Wuhan “Old-Thoughts”. At that time, the Central Committee was about to hold the Ninth Congress. Not only I was reluctant to take risks, but I also feared leading the masses into mistakes. Xia Bangyin, Zhu Hongxia also had concerns. But Hu Houmin was resolute, did meticulous ideological work, had strong organizational ability, and managed to get the “Old-Thoughts” movement started. To be fair, his motivation was to speak for the rebels and dare to lead. But during the Ninth Congress, openly marching and giving speeches on the streets clearly disrupted Chairman Mao’s strategic deployment, which was a shortsighted act against the overall situation, moving against the trend, and doomed to failure, bringing disaster rather than blessing to the rebels. After the first meeting with the central leaders, most rebel leaders believed that the “Old-Thoughts” in Wuhan should be cooled down. Xia Bangyin, Zhu Hongxia, Zhang Yaozhong[^33], and I shared this view. But Hu Houmin insisted on heating up the “Old-Thoughts” in Wuhan. Hu Houmin first worked on me. He said: “Raising the temperature of the Wuhan “Old-Thoughts” shows the strength and demands of the masses. If we say cool down, Wuhan will cool down, which is self-incrimination. In the future, the ones who will be held accountable are us leaders.” I said: “It’s okay to be held accountable. Let’s raise the temperature!” Based on Hu Houmin’s suggestion, I wrote two letters to Guo Hongbin and Fang Bin in Wuhan, demanding that the “Old-Thoughts” not only not be extinguished but also be heated up. I drafted these letters, and Zhu Hongxia and Li Xiangyu signed them. When I was tried in 1983, the court presented evidence that our three-person letters from Beijing were published in small newspapers. I admitted that I wrote them, and did not shift the responsibility to Hu Houmin or involve others. The issue of writing these letters became my crime in 1983, because I never confessed, and the authorities always believed I was the author, so my “Criminal Judgment” (City Law [83] Criminal First Instance No. 6) stated: "On April 30 and May 6, Wu Yanjin colluded with Zhu Hongxia and others in Beijing to write letters to comrades in Wuhan, urging them to “carry the fight against the “Old-Thoughts” to the end.”
Old Tian’s article “Seven Rounds of Political Game between the Rebels and the Ruling Faction” said: "The ‘527 Directive’ falsely claimed that the rebels ‘placed the Workers’ Congress above the revolutionary committees,’ completely disregarding the measures taken by the ruling faction to suppress the rebels, and only blamed the rebels’ mistakes, effectively canceling the rebels’ right to use the ‘Four Major’ (Four Greats). After the ‘527 Directive’ was issued, the rebels no longer carried out open mass movements, but among the broad masses of rebels, the opposition against the revolutionary committees could not be eliminated. Some rebels thus held Zhou Enlai in some resentment. Strangely, among the central leaders involved in handling Wuhan issues, except Zhou Enlai and Kang Sheng, the others formed the entire ‘Línbiāo Anti-Party Group.’ This unfavorable process for the adjustment of the rebels did not involve Jiang Qing, Zhang Chunqiao, and Yao Wenyuan. The political report of the Ninth Congress titled “Unite and Strive for Greater Victory” implied that all actions of the ruling faction were immune from investigation, and the only way to “unite” was to suppress the dissatisfaction and resistance of the rebels."The movement of the “repetition of the old” that does not promote the slogan of “repetition of the old” has undermined the implementation of the “February 27” directives.
Back then, Lu Lian (a member of the North Decision Yang group, never elected as the number one leader by Zeng and Liu, and imprisoned) was inexplicably shocked after hearing Chen Jun’s report of the ten major crimes. He wrote decades later: “I had never heard of the last few items before, probably promoted by some mass organizations in society, and they all lumped us together to fill the ‘Ten Crimes,’ ‘Comrade Liu Feng’ really did have a bit of the ‘Ten Scenic Diseases’ that Mr. Lu Xun talked about.” (Lu Lian, “Longing to the Sky”, pages 432-433, Chinese University Press, Hong Kong, 2005 edition)
In fact, “Comrade Liu Feng” did not suffer from any “Ten Scenic Diseases.” They had planned well, using fabricated charges and the central government’s designation of the North Decision Yang as a counterrevolutionary organization as a basket to contain all the rebellious factions, and to wipe them out in one go. Zeng and Liu’s “drunken” intentions were long gone from those few “empty discussions” by the scholars.
In early November 1969, according to the 927 directives, the central government decided to establish a Mao Zedong Thought study class for Hubei Province in Beijing. Over a thousand rebel leaders gathered at the Beijing Air Force Academy. Ping Yi[^41] recalled: The study class was supposedly of the same nature as the Central Party School, with Lin Biao as honorary president and Chen Boda personally presiding. The main person in charge of the Hubei class was Zhang Zhaojian, who said the purpose was to fight against bourgeoisie revisionism, resolve factional issues in Hubei, and clarify major incidents during the Cultural Revolution in Hubei, such as gun snatching, armed conflicts, factional meetings, and major debates. In reality, it was aimed at targeting the North Decision Yang and the 516 organization. Zhang Zhaojian directed most of his attacks at the San Gang (Three Steel Plants). Because the General Steel Organization was very influential in Wuhan and throughout Hubei, and Hu Houmin was involved in power struggles, factional fights, and repeating old issues, Zhang Zhaojian also targeted Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin as important targets. During the study class, emotions were repeatedly stirred, raising questions about self-awareness and exposing others, reaching the level of loyalty to Chairman Mao. Participants were forced to admit involvement with North Decision Yang and 516. The focus was mainly on the Steel General and Steel Second Division organizations, requiring everyone to fill out various forms of reactionary organizations, following the instructions and hints until the authorities were satisfied.
Wang Guangzhao said: The ruling faction paid special attention to Hu Houmin. Tong Yulian, a female representative of Wuhan rebels from the Telecommunications Bureau, had visited Albania as part of the Chinese Women’s Delegation. The ruling faction wanted to persecute Hu Houmin, but lacking solid evidence, they forced Tong Yulian to admit to improper romantic relations with Hu Houmin. The study class used a wheel battle tactic, working day and night without rest, shining bright lights into her eyes, and finally forcing her to jump from a building to her death.
Besides forcing rebels to admit participation in North Decision Yang, Chen Boda and others also deliberately labeled the rebels as 516 members. Liu Hanwu[^42] recalled: In January 1970, Chen Boda spoke at the study class, saying that the rebels deviated from Mao’s revolutionary line, with inflated factionalism, and after overthrowing some capitalists, they became complacent, collaborating with the capitalists. When the 516 organization appeared in Beijing and the central government arrested them, they dispersed to various places to develop organizations. Chen Boda asked if there was a 516 in Wuhan, to which Zhu Hongxia replied that Wuhan rebels were opposed to 516 ideologically and had conducted internal investigations without finding any evidence of 516. After Chen Boda left, he returned and said that 516 had greatly expanded its organization in Wuhan. Chen Boda became increasingly angry, criticizing them for their lack of fighting spirit and expressing disappointment. During the Beijing study class, Chen Boda gave multiple speeches, one of which said: “Heaven’s punishment can be avoided; self-inflicted punishment cannot.” Once, Chen Boda pointed at someone and said, “I think you are just like a 516.” Lei Zhimiao recalled: Chen Boda said Wuhan was the base, stronghold, warehouse, safe deposit box, and archive of 516.
At that time, the Sichuan and Anhui classes at the Air Force Academy also heavily pursued the 516 organization under Chen Boda’s influence. Wuhan also added the North Decision Yang issue. Because it was impossible to overthrow all or most rebels due to personality issues, a common problem was fabricated. In the later stages of the study class, they arrested Liu Wantai of the General Steel Organization[^43], Zhang Pengcheng of the 913 organization[^44], and Wang Jinming of the Steel General Command[^45], labeling them as current counterrevolutionaries. Within the Second Division, they first broke through Lei Zhimiao, Li Suming[^46], Li Li, and Zhu Dezheng (members of the Second Division at Hubei Medical College), who all admitted to participating in North Decision Yang and 516. According to Li Li later, Zhang Zhaojian personally found him, rolled up his sleeves, and stood on the table, saying that if he did not admit to being part of 516, just the incident of Li Li leading people to seize provincial party secret archives could be punishable by death. Zhang Zhaojian also asked them to discuss and craft a more convincing lie. They recorded the confessions of Lei Zhimiao and others admitting to being 516 members and played the recordings all over Wuhan.
Yang Daoyuan recalled: I later heard Zhang Zhaojian convey that Chen Boda said: after Beijing arrested 516, they fled to Wuhan, and the materials were transferred there. Wuhan was the stronghold and safe deposit of 516, and the keys were in Yang Daoyuan’s hands.
Because the new faction emerged in opposition to North Decision Yang from the start, calling the new faction the “North Decision Yang,” it indeed made everyone in the world suspicious. Chen Boda, a great scholar, turned the focus of the study class from eliminating factionalism to hunting down 516 members, finding a common issue that could be used to target all rebels.
According to Lin Zizhong, Wu Yanjin, and others, at that time, military representatives in the provincial second recruitment class talked with Peng Xun, saying that if they admitted to participating in 516, they could retain their party membership and be assigned housing; if not, they would be arrested. Under coercion and inducement, Peng Xun admitted to participating in 516, claiming that all the new faction leaders had participated. Chen Desheng[^47] said: We all believed it at the time, thinking Old Peng was truly involved in 516, so we also admitted.
Hu Houmin refused to admit, but this did not prevent him from becoming a double agent counterrevolutionary. Suppressing Hu Houmin was always the fixed policy of Leaders Zeng and Liu. In 1974, Xu Jian of the military district’s third office exposed: Zeng Siyu and Liu Feng implemented Lin Biao’s far-right policies, denying and attacking emerging forces, which had been long-standing. Zeng Siyu said: “I hate rebels because they don’t listen and don’t obey orders.” Zeng and Liu, through Zhang Yuhua[^48], learned about the rebels’ movements, claiming not to let any dissent appear, to consolidate the good situation, but actually understanding the movements to manipulate people. They were told to gather materials on Hu Houmin, which took a week, then told not to do it anymore. After Hu Houmin entered the Beijing study class, with no materials, the 516 members could not be identified, so they called Wang Yifu and me to gather Hu Houmin’s “Three Anti” remarks, just one item was enough. The materials were handed to Zhang Yuhua, who said that the charges were not high enough.
“Liu Feng said: ‘Anyone who has been to Beijing for connections must be checked as 516.’ This was disclosed by Secretary Ke Wen, and Liu Feng said it in Wuhan.” (“Is this also a revelation?!—Report No. 9 to the Military Region on attacking the ‘Zeng Liu Office’ delegation”) In January 1971, Zeng Siyu publicly accused Hu Houmin of being a 516 and North Decision Yang member at the ‘Two Generations Conference’ in Hubei (Party Congress and the Conference for Studying Mao’s Works). Zeng Siyu said: “We must overthrow the ‘three oppositions,’ ‘three reconstructions,’ and ‘three long-term struggles’ of the ‘North, Decision, and Yang’ counterrevolutionary black program.” “Hu Houmin was the station chief of the (General Steel) Liaison Office in Beijing, involved in many counterrevolutionary activities. He conspired with ‘516,’ and with Wang, Guan, Qi, Lin Jie, Wu Chuanqi, and Song Luo from Wuhan.”
In 1974, Ma Zhaokun, head of the third office of the military district, exposed that Zeng Siyu said: “The city’s ‘Two Generations Conference’ wanted to persecute Hu Houmin, Ren Aisheng, and Li Xiangyu; the provincial meeting also wanted to persecute them.” “To be honest, 516 is 516, North Decision Yang is North Decision Yang, as many as there are, until everything is cleared out.” On February 13, 1971, Zeng’s secretary conveyed Zeng Siyu’s opinion: “North Decision Yang is just a variant of 516.” On March 1, 1972, at the ‘Three Support and Two Military’ work meeting, Zeng Siyu said: “What did 516 and North Decision Yang do wrong? The central government is aware. There are ten major events nationwide, six of which are in Hubei. Our main focus was on North Decision Yang. Wuhan indeed had North Decision Yang. We did some work, and Chairman Mao told us to pay attention. Chen Boda told us to do some work, but not to go overboard. The enemies did many bad things, now it’s clear, and it’s all traced back to Liu Feng. Our efforts to promote 516 and North Decision Yang were overdone, and Chen Boda told us to avoid excessive expansion.” (“Is this also a revelation?!—Report No. 9 to the Military Region on attacking the ‘Zeng Liu Office’ delegation”) These revelations are shocking.
Regarding the “three long-term struggles,” Yang Daoyuan recalled: In early October 1969, the Hubei Provincial Revolutionary Committee held an expanded meeting. When Zhu Hongxia spoke, he led a comprehensive critique of Hu Houmin, which is believed to have been influenced by Zhang Tixue. During National Day in Beijing, he was quite firm, but how did he change so much after returning? Now, Zhu Hongxia has passed away many years ago, and I don’t know how his speech was actually prepared at that time. I couldn’t find Zhu Hongxia during those days; perhaps the speech was not entirely his own work, or it was prepared by a small circle of people. He spoke about Hu Houmin’s proposal of the “Three Long-Term Struggles,” with a theoretical tone. Looking back today, I think talking about the long-term struggles of Steel and New is very wrong. The division of Steel and New is a tragedy of the rebels. The long-term struggles only benefit the capitalists. Nevertheless, the “Three Long-Term Struggles” do not seem to contain any reactionary content; it is merely a matter of ideological understanding. But at that time, hearing this statement for the first time, it felt very fresh and sensational, as if it was a major event. His speech was also produced in a certain atmosphere; earlier, the Telecommunications Bureau and Wu Zhong had already spoken of Zhu Hongxia as heinous, and under that condition, he couldn’t withstand it, so he raised the tone even higher, and all the blame was shifted onto Hu Houmin. Zeng Siyu, Liu Feng, and Zhang Tixue, all experienced from the battlefield, were very good at choosing breakthroughs, like playing chess, with a step followed by another. After the 927 directives, Zeng and Liu first labeled the Steel faction leaders as North Decision Yang, and also leaned towards North Decision Yang for those in the new faction who were less obedient. They fabricated that North Decision Yang was just Wuhan’s 516, and arrested all rebels under the banner of fighting 516, aiming to wipe out all rebels in one sweep.
According to Li Chenghong’s recollection: “The ‘Three Long-Term Struggles’ were not invented by Hu Houmin. I have never heard him speak of the ‘Three Long-Term Struggles.’ This was just a recurring idea in his words and actions, and Zhu Hongxia was good at summarizing and generalizing.” According to Wei Shengwu[^50], on January 17, 1970, Chen Boda once again visited the Wuhan class, reporting that “Wuhan is an important base of 516,” and falsely claimed that he was the front commander of 516 in Wuhan, hiding black materials related to Chen Boda and others from Beijing’s 516. Chen Boda immediately instructed that the Wuhan class should focus on investigating 516. On the morning of May 31, during a summary meeting, Chief of Staff Wang Buqing suddenly announced: “With Comrade Boda’s approval, and signed by General Huang, it was decided to send Hu Houmin, Ren Aisheng, and Li Xiangyu back to Hubei for further struggle, and Peng Xun to a farm for re-education through labor. Wei Shengwu was to undergo special case review.” That afternoon, we were taken back to Wuhan in advance.
On May 30, 1970, Hu Houmin, Li Xiangyu, and Ren Aisheng were separately arrested from the study class and taken back to Hubei. Hu Houmin was identified as the chief of the Hubei 516 organization.
Gu Jiantang[^51] recalled: Liu Feng said on October 1, 1970, while watching fireworks at the Hanyang Bridge, “North, Decision, Yang” is just the “Five One Six” of the soil.
Yang Daoyuan recalled: After the disbandment of the first righteous path study class in 1972, only he, Hu Houmin, and Ren Aisheng remained locked in the provincial Public Security Department. It was a separate yard with a kitchen, but meals were not shared; occasional unlocking allowed hearing conversations, and life was not too cruel. In March 1973, they were transferred out of Wuhan by a large truck with a canopy, surrounded by soldiers, with Yang in the middle. When they arrived at the guesthouse, he saw the bedding with the words “Xianing District Guesthouse,” and realized they had arrived in Xianing. They lived in a small villa on the mountain, with Yang and Ren Aisheng in one building, but not allowed to meet; Hu Houmin was in another building. They mainly studied on their own. One day in early 1974, a special case team from the provincial Public Security Department, He Guozhu, came and changed his tone, saying how they treated the emerging forces, showing his own enlightenment. Soon after, the provincial authorities sent Vice Director Liang Renkui and Party Secretary Xue Tan to ask questions about their thoughts, then said the province decided to send me to the military, and Major Zhou from the Engineering Corps in Xianing came to pick me up, taking me to the army, but no conclusion was reached. On that day, they released Hu Houmin, and Ren Aisheng’s whereabouts became unknown.
In 1972, Zhang Tixue told Liu Hanwu at Hongshan Hotel: “Hubei’s crackdown on 516 and North Decision Yang involved over 600,000 people in the whole province.”
The so-called “top leaders” of the nationwide 516, Wang Li, who was accused by the authorities, said in a letter to the Party Central Committee in Qincheng Prison on July 17, 1981: “The Central Commission for Discipline Inspection told me that over ten million ‘516’ members were purged nationwide.” (“Wang Li’s Reflection Records,” page 380, Hong Kong Beixing Publishing, 2001 edition) From September 1967 to the end of 1972, the CCP Central Committee issued multiple documents deploying nationwide investigations into 516 members. The scope of suppression, the duration, and the methods used to persecute people broke new ground during the Cultural Revolution. Besides Wang Li, Guanfeng, and Qibenyu, others like Xiao Hua, Yang Chengwu, Yu Lijin, and Fu Chongbi were also named. Later, all these people were proven not to be 516. Once an account was created, it should be closed. This major wrongful case that lasted nine years, affecting over ten million people nationwide, was not rectified after the Cultural Revolution was condemned; no victims received rehabilitation, apologies, or reasonable explanations. Many were killed, disabled, or affected lifelong normal development and basic living conditions.
In October 1979, the High People’s Court of Hubei Province submitted a “Request Report on Handling the North Decision Yang Case,” approved by the Hubei Provincial Party Committee, pointing out that the main evidence used to identify North Decision Yang as a counterrevolutionary organization—namely, that the behind-the-scenes was manipulated by a small group of traitors, spies, and counterrevolutionaries—no longer existed. Moreover, the publicly issued “Declaration of the Decision Faction” could not be regarded as a reactionary program, so North Decision Yang could not be classified as a counterrevolutionary organization. After long imprisonment, the so-called “black backstage” Wang Shengrong, Zhou Yuesen, Gan Yi, and others were rehabilitated and acquitted; Lu Lian and Feng Tian’ai were not prosecuted and were released.
The two counterrevolutionary conspiracy groups were entirely fictitious, and it is clear that the real purpose of this crackdown was elsewhere. The false accusations that Hu Houmin organized the 516 core leadership group in Beijing and that he participated in organizing the counterrevolutionary organization North Decision Yang were malicious tactics to attack the rebels.
Seven, the “Release, Equalize, Rehabilitate, Promote, Incorporate” policy during the Criticize Lin and Confucius campaign
During the five years from late 1968 to late 1973, when the power in Wuhan, Hubei, was mainly held by military cadres, their main goal was to “deeply expose North Decision Yang and thoroughly investigate 516,” and to brand all rebels as villains. Zeng Siyu, Liu Feng, and others, for the sake of power struggles, targeted many local cadres as well. Liu Feng often said: “Southbound cadres are full of spies, the Fifth Division (New Fourth Army Fifth Division) cadres are full of traitors, and underground party cadres are local snakes.” The entire cadre team, like the rebel factions, was hard to find good people; only they held power, which seemed most reasonable. At that time, Zhang Tixue, deputy director of the provincial Revolutionary Committee, privately told Zhang Yingxian of Xinhua Hubei Branch: “I, Zhang Tixue, was recommended by Premier Zhou to join the provincial Revolutionary Committee, but after taking office, I couldn’t read documents or attend relevant meetings; my actions were monitored, and there were always reports about me.” (Zhang Yingxian, “Loyal Soldier, Noble Character—Commemorating the 30th Anniversary of Comrade Zhang Tixue’s Death,” published in the September 3, 2003, edition of Hubei Daily) Zhang Tixue also told Gu Jiantang: “Don’t think that I am great just because I am deputy director of the provincial Revolutionary Committee. My secretary and bodyguards are all assigned by others.”
Therefore, the real “overthrow of the Revolutionary Committee” was actually carried out by Lin Biao’s close allies, such as “Living Party” Zeng Siyu, Liu Feng, Fang Ming, Zhang Zhaojian, etc. Besides widespread public resentment, they also harbored great “official anger.” During the more than six years from July 20, 1967, to late 1973, Zeng Siyu, Liu Feng, Fang Ming, and Zhang Zhaojian suppressed cadres and masses with far greater intensity than Wang Renmin and Chen Zhaodao during the earlier period.
Gu Jiantang recalled: During the early stage of the Criticize Lin and Confucius movement, the Hubei Provincial Party Committee, under Zhao Xinchun, Zhao Xiu, and Wang Kewen[^52], adopted a supportive and permissive attitude toward the demands and actions of the masses. In early February 1974, the provincial Party Committee held a symposium on criticizing Lin and Confucius, attended by Secretary Zhao Xinchun, Zhao Xiu, Jiang Yihe, and representatives of the masses from the provincial Revolutionary Committee, including Zhu Hongxia, Zhang Liguo, Gu Jiantang, Pan Hongbin[^53], Wang Ping[^54], Zhong Xigang[^55], and Deng Jinfu[^56]. They discussed how to carry out the movement. Everyone affirmed the positive attitude of the provincial Party Committee, hoping to fully mobilize and rely on the masses, closely linking the crimes and errors of Lin Biao’s close allies Liu Feng and the “Living Party” Zeng Siyu, to launch the Criticize Lin and Confucius campaign. They unanimously agreed to release Hu Houmin, Yang Daoyuan, and Ren Aisheng, who had been long detained. Secretary Zhao Xinchun said: “Under Mao’s revolutionary line, the provincial Party Committee will work with the broad masses to criticize Lin and Confucius.” Regarding the release of Hu Houmin and others, the provincial Party Committee would seriously study and give an explanation. In February 1974, at the request of mass organizations, another symposium was held, and on March 2, Hu Houmin, who had been labeled as the top leader of North Decision Yang and 516 in Hubei by Zeng and Liu, was released. This formed a unified front of the Criticize Lin and Confucius movement, with little interference, lifting the curtain on Zeng and Liu’s false accusations, and bringing hope for the millions of wronged, persecuted, and oppressed masses and cadres to be exonerated and rehabilitated.
On March 2, Hu Houmin was released from prison. He was in very poor health and often went to Xiehe Hospital for treatment. Li Chenghong said: "I didn’t pay much attention to visiting Hu Houmin. I had already exposed and criticized him at many meetings. The first time I saw him, I thought I should admit my mistakes and reflect! Fortunately, Hu Houmin was very magnanimous and tolerant. He often said that if everyone was calculating, I would become a lonely person. When I saw him at the No. 13 building of the provincial Party Committee, I didn’t apologize or criticize; we just exchanged greetings. He asked about the situation of some factories and acquaintances. I suggested hosting a reception for him, and he specifically asked about my mother. Since he had visited my home several times and remembered the dishes my mother cooked, the barriers between us melted away. Hu Houmin held a basic view during the Cultural Revolution: he could forgive and tolerate those who accused and criticized him if they were of lower status, but for those of equal or higher status, he would argue about right and wrong. This was proven many times in my experience. When he was released, he was treated like a hero, and there was a queue for a reception. At that time, the Wuchang Casting Steel Factory had returned to the Wuhan Shipyard, called the Casting Steel Branch. Our branch secretary, Chen Shaohua, also asked me to do everything possible to bring Hu Houmin back to the branch and report. The secretary and I ran around for two days before I found out Hu Houmin’s exact residence.
At this time, Hu Houmin had become a leader figure admired by both the “Countercurrent” faction (a more radical faction that appeared in Wuhan rebels after the 10th Congress in 1973, represented by Nie Nian Sheng, Wang Huazhen, Xie Miaofu, etc.) and the Steel New factions, with influence surpassing that during the General Steel period. The “Countercurrent” faction was very powerful at that time, and Hu Houmin’s release was largely due to their efforts. However, Hu Houmin had a natural orthodox rebel viewpoint and was unwilling to associate with them, so he still relied on the Four Great Kings of the General Steel: Wu Zhong, Wu Guo, Wu Chuan, and the Telecommunications Bureau.
According to Gu Jiantang: At that time, Yan Chang (a student at Yangtze River Engineering University and a standing member of the Changjiang Revolutionary Committee) participated in seizing black materials from the Wuhan Military District’s “Two Cleans and One Purge” campaign, discovering a list of 18 names with Zeng Siyu’s handwritten instructions, stating that when necessary, these rebels should be executed. Among them was my name. When the eight military districts’ commanders were reassigned, Zeng Siyu held a meeting at Hongshan Hotel with officers above regiment level and provincial revolutionary committee members, including Zhao Xinchun, Zhao Xiu, and others. Zeng Siyu said: “The crackdown on North Decision Yang and 516 in Hubei involved over 300,000 people. We did wrong. We fought too hard, and some people who shouldn’t have been persecuted were persecuted. I feel very sorry and apologize to those wrongfully accused.” Zhu Hongxia also said at the meeting that admitting mistakes was enough, and Zeng Siyu took the opportunity to slip away. We later felt very dissatisfied; so many people were wronged, but none were rehabilitated.
Lin Zizhong recalled: On March 30, 1974, when the Steel faction was demanding the military district produce black materials for the “Two Cleans and One Purge” campaign, the new faction leader Zhang Liguo ordered me to lead the effort to find and seal the materials at the municipal Party Committee. At that time, the relations between the Steel and New factions were not harmonious, but they all realized that they had to unite. Hu Houmin arrived at the Party Committee and firmly supported our action to seal the black materials. Peng Xun also responded positively, saying: “Whether it’s the ‘Old Machine’ of the Steel faction or the ‘Duck’ of the New faction, they are all the ‘Little Zheng Mao’ of today.” The Secretary of the municipal Party Committee, Wang Kewen, met with us in a small conference room in the No. 1 building of the Party School. Wang Kewen said: “Zeng Siyu is not a member of the PLA; he is a warlord.” He also specifically refuted Zeng and Liu’s accusations against Hu Houmin, saying they were not true. Lin Zizhong said: “According to proper procedures, we kept an IOU and transported over 30,000 copies of the ‘Two Cleans’ materials back, with Wang Kewen’s approval.” A week later, the secretary of the municipal Party Committee, Li Qiu, conveyed Prime Minister Zhou’s instructions: “All the materials that were moved or stolen must be returned.” We returned all the materials without missing a single copy, and none of us was criminally prosecuted. This was the true story of the “organized multiple attacks on the military district and provincial revolutionary committees.”
Wu Yanjin recalled: After Hu Houmin was released, he immediately engaged in the Criticize Lin and Confucius campaign, and the so-called “release, equalize, rehabilitate, promote, incorporate” policy towards rebel leaders.The five-character policy was summarized by Zhu Hongxia based on Hu Houmin’s ideas. “Fang” means to release people, releasing all rebellious leaders imprisoned in jail; there was a famous saying at the time, “Open the prison to find leftists,” which means this. “Ping” means to rehabilitate the rebellious who were labeled as 516, Beijueyang, or bad leaders. “Bu” means to support the revolutionary committees at all levels, to bring back the expelled mass organization representatives, and to give them a role in the new red regimes at all levels. “Ti” refers to promoting cadres and positions, meaning that representatives of rebellious factions should be included in the restored party committees, trade unions, Youth League, Women’s Federation, etc. “Na” means to absorb new members, i.e., to admit rebellious faction members into the party, based on Chairman Mao’s 1968 directive on rectifying the party: “A proletarian party must discard the old and absorb the new to stay vigorous.” During the Anti-Lin, Anti-Confucius movement, I gave several reports alongside Zhu Hongxia, emphasizing “Fang, Ping, Bu, Ti, Na,” which later became an important charge against me when I was sentenced; I accepted this calmly. During interrogations, I never shifted the blame to Zhu Hongxia or Hu Houmin.
Hu Houmin was promoted to the provincial General Federation of Trade Unions as deputy director, not a key department. Cao Chengyi[^57] said: “In the second half of 1974, our demand for ‘Fang’ had not yet been implemented in Yiye, and ‘Ping’ had achieved some results, but ‘Bu,’ ‘Ti,’ and ‘Na’ had not started. The movement was lively for a while, but after the Central Committee proposed ‘deep and lasting’ development, it quickly cooled down. We failed again in this round of struggle under favorable circumstances.” The Hubei Provincial Party Committee then devised a new tactic, transferring influential rebellious leaders out of the province. They did not promote ‘Bu,’ ‘Ti,’ or ‘Na,’ but instead told the rebels to “roll away.” The Provincial Organization Department issued a red-headed document to me, a non-party cadre, transferring me to work at the Provincial Metallurgical Construction Company near Huangshi Tonglushan, without even a formal talk, only a基层领导 handed me the document. I resolutely resisted and did not report for work. At that time, Fu Lian[^58] was transferred to Yichang, and Peng Xun was also transferred from Hubei University.
In late May, with the change in central policy, large-scale mass movements subsided. From early 1975 to the end of the year, during Deng Xiaoping’s rectification, Hu Houmin, Xia Bangyin, Zhang Liguo, and Zhu Hongxia were assigned to Luo Tian, Macheng, Dawu, and Tongcheng counties for temporary work, with Hu Houmin, Xia Bangyin, and Zhang Liguo serving as deputy county party secretaries and commune party secretaries. Zhu Hongxia was not a party member, serving as deputy director of the county revolutionary committee and director of the commune revolutionary committee. Gu Jiantang said that most of the rebellious leaders involved in the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees at that time “rolled down”. Officially, it was based on Deng Xiaoping’s instructions that new cadres should be trained for future work; internally, the provincial and revolutionary committees instructed that these leaders would cause trouble in Wuhan, so they were “rolled down” to supervise. This method was used to expel representatives of mass organizations from the “Three Combines”. These individuals worked actively at the grassroots level and maintained good relations with local cadres. In February 1976, the provincial party committee ordered all counties to recall us to Wuhan to participate in the campaign against Deng and the rightist reversal.
8. Becoming “Goose Head” in the Counterattack against the Rightist Reversal
According to many rebellious leaders like Wu Yanjin, Cao Chengyi, Lin Zizhong, the 1976 campaign in Hubei to criticize Deng and counter the rightist reversal was led by Hu Houmin. Without Hu Houmin’s leadership, this movement could not have been initiated. Hu Houmin was mockingly called “Goose Head,” meaning the chief strategist among rebellious leaders who fanned the flames.
Wu Yanjin said: “Hu Houmin first approached me, influencing the new faction’s Pan Hongbin, Gu Jiantang, Xie Wangchun[^59], and others. At that time, the two factions of Gangxin were united, and Hu Houmin indeed had the ability to rally and organize.”
Regarding Hu Houmin’s role in the 1976 campaign to criticize Deng and oppose the rightist reversal, Wu Yanjin said: "Deng Xiaoping, the political strongman, wanted to overturn the Cultural Revolution, which Chairman Mao obviously did not agree with. This led to the meeting in early 1976 where Hua Guofeng conveyed the Fourth Central Committee document, calling for close follow-up with Deng Xiaoping’s ruling faction to ‘turn well.’ The most active in responding to Chairman Mao’s call were undoubtedly the rebellious factions suppressed by Deng Xiaoping. In Wuhan, Hu Houmin organized and led the campaign against Deng and the rightist reversal. He is a professional revolutionary, always fully投入每次运动。春节期间，夏邦银、朱鸿霞、胡厚民、李想玉、潘宏斌、田学群[^60]、曹承义、彭勋、郑峰[^61]和我等人在傅廉家聚会，最多谈到的是胡厚民和彭勋。胡厚民提出：这次批邓，要请两位中央委员夏邦银、谢望春举旗。经过讨论，由夏邦银、谢望春、朱鸿霞、李想玉、吴焱金、胡厚民、顾建棠七人组成领导班子。这七个人，简称“夏、谢、朱、李、吴、胡、顾”，又被称作“夏、谢的旗子，朱、李、吴的牌子，胡、顾、彭（勋）的点子”。除了领导小组，还有参谋班子。参谋长是胡厚民，成员有顾建棠、沈复礼、聂年生、彭勋、曹承义。其中聂年生仅参加一两次会就自动退出了。参谋班子又戏称为摇鹅毛扇的鹅头鹅毛班，胡厚民被称为鹅头，其余都是鹅毛，大家常以此互相取笑。参谋班子经过研究，提出：为接受反复旧运动的教训，这次不组织大规模的群众运动，而是充分运用宪法保障的“大鸣、大放、大字报、大辩论”四大武器，以省委第一书记赵辛初1975年6月4日在省委扩大会上的讲话为突破口，在“滚”字上做文章，要把两清一批时从各级革委会“滚”出去的造反派代表再“请”回来。办法是：“上促下攻，内紧外松，立足基层，统一行动。”这个口号是顾建棠提出来的。这本不是什么新鲜货，也不是哪一个人的发明，而是1974年批林批孔中夏邦银到中央开会听到的北京和上海经验，是夏邦银打电话告诉朱鸿霞和胡厚民的。这句话竟成了篡党夺权的“基调”，连同严常提出的“目的不变，决心不变，基调不变，突破口不变，方法要善变，以不变应万变”的所谓反革命“策略”，在1982－1983年审判造反派头头时以此分别追究每个人的罪行，沈复礼也因此而坐了几年牢。会后，由彭勋拟定十几条顺口溜作为大标语，由曹承义带人刷遍武汉三镇。大标语有：“湖北有个赵辛初，扩大会上来讲话，手舞邓记尚方剑，六月四日大砍杀”，“六四讲话大毒草，滚出去要请回来”，“两清一批犯了方向路线错误”，“对造反派要高抬贵手”等。
Wu Yanjin said: "What if we don’t carry out large-scale mass movements? We just promote the ‘turning’ within the provincial party committee on a small scale. The provincial leaders at that time dared not say they wouldn’t turn, instead they shouted loudly about ‘turning.’ The specifics of how and where to turn were the question. Hu Houmin led mass representatives from the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees twice to the provincial party committee standing committee to push for the committee. Why could we always smoothly enter the standing committee meeting? Because Xia Bangyin and Xie Wangchun, as central committee members in Wuhan, could naturally attend the meetings. When the standing committee met, Xia Bangyin would call Hu Houmin to inform him, and Hu would lead the team there, so it was a sure thing. ‘Breaking into’ the standing committee was also a charge in the sentencing. At that time, there was no real break-in, and few people wanted to break in but couldn’t. We were all representatives of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees with IDs, and both times Xia Bangyin came out to let us in, so we could face the provincial leaders and exchange views on criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. We were very familiar with the provincial leaders and talked calmly. Zhao Xinchu and others approved of this way of talking. They didn’t want society to become chaotic like the large-scale mass movement of 1969. The provincial leaders reached some consensus with us: 1. The provincial committee was actively turning, firmly criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. 2. Correctly treating the proletarian cultural revolution and the rebellious factions, all those “rolled” down should be brought back. 3. The “two clears and one batch” made mistakes of expansion (which we saw as errors in direction and路线, the rightist reversal and denial of the cultural revolution). However, opinions differed on whether rebellious leaders should be admitted into the party, promoted, or supported, and on whether the provincial party committee should follow Deng Xiaoping’s big rightist reversal, with Secretary Han Ningfu showing more opposition.
According to Lin Zizhong, Gu Jiantang, and others’ recollections: In late October 1976, Hu Houmin even twice approached Yu Wenbin[^62], the leader of the ‘Million Heroic Army.’ We and Hu Houmin both advocated cooperation with the ‘Million Heroic Army’ to deal with the ruling faction, but most rebels opposed, calling us ‘surrenderists.’
Under Hu Houmin’s call, in March 1976, rebels began to push the provincial party committee to turn. Hu Houmin assigned specific tasks: Cao Chengyi as frontline commander, Lin Zizhong as现场指挥, Yan Chang as secretary. Besides the main responsibility and staff, there were divisions for materials, propaganda, logistics, security, propaganda vehicles, briefings, engraving, slogans, water tower printing groups. Because most staff were from the new faction, Lin Zizhong joked that the counterattack against the rightist reversal was led by “new recruits with steel heads.” Under Hu Houmin’s leadership, the main actions of the rebels in Hubei in 1976 included:
-
Collect signatures from Central Committee members in Wuhan and some provincial and municipal revolutionary committee standing members to publish an open letter to the entire province, issuing critical articles and slogans, calling on the people to respond to Mao’s criticism of Deng and oppose the rightist reversal, closely linking with Hubei and Wuhan’s realities, and guiding cadres to “turn”. Most slogans were drafted by Hu Houmin’s staff team to unify thoughts and clarify main targets. Lin Zizhong and Cao Chengyi recalled: Hu Houmin attached great importance to slogans at each stage, likening it to leading troops—training daily, focusing on ideological education, preventing soldiers from idling, as without slogans, morale would drop and people would be at a loss.
-
On May 2, 1976, Zheng Jun recorded slogans and struggle strategies proposed by the staff team: “Inner tight, outer loose, promote from below, attack from above,深入基层，发动群众。” The four unchanged principles: “目标不变，湖北路线搞正，组织上要体现出来；决心不变；基调不变，也可以说是原则不变，去年七、八、九（月），是林（彪）、刘（丰）路线的继续；突破口不变，（省委第一书记、省革委会主任赵辛初1975年的）‘六四’报告（是执行邓小平的‘三项指示为纲’）。活动上灵活机动，重点在基层以革委会、（革命）领导小组为我们的活动手段。五月份争取有1/3的单位搞起来。抓点：武重、武钢、一冶、交通局、体委。” The “roll back” strategy involved: (1) urging from above, attacking from below, (2) tightening internally and loosening externally, (3) focusing on基层, and (4) unifying actions. This slogan was proposed by Gu Jiantang. It wasn’t new or invented by any individual but was based on experiences from Beijing and Shanghai during the 1974 Anti-Lin, Anti-Confucius campaign, communicated by Xia Bangyin to Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin. This phrase became the “tone” for usurpation of party power, along with Yan Chang’s “unchanged goal, resolution, tone, and breakthrough, with adaptable methods.” During the 1982-1983 trial of rebellious leaders, these were used to prosecute each person, and Shen Fuli also spent years in prison because of this. After the meeting, Peng Xun drafted several slogans as banners, and Cao Chengyi led people to plaster them across Wuhan’s three towns. Major slogans included: “Hubei has Zhao Xinchu, who spoke at the expansion meeting, waving Deng’s Shangfang sword, killing on June 4,” “June 4 speech is a poisonous weed, roll out and bring back,” “Two clears and one batch made mistakes in方向路线,” “Show mercy to rebels,” etc.
Wu Yanjin said: "What if we don’t do large-scale mass movements? We just promote the ‘turning’ within the provincial party committee on a small scale. The provincial leaders at that time dared not say they wouldn’t turn, instead they loudly shouted about ‘turning.’ The specifics of how and where to turn were the question. Hu Houmin led mass representatives from the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees twice to the provincial party committee standing committee to push for the committee. Why could we always smoothly enter the standing committee meeting? Because Xia Bangyin and Xie Wangchun, as central committee members in Wuhan, could naturally attend the meetings. When the standing committee met, Xia Bangyin would call Hu Houmin to inform him, and Hu would lead the team there, so it was a sure thing. ‘Breaking into’ the standing committee was also a charge in the sentencing. At that time, there was no real break-in, and few people wanted to break in but couldn’t. We were all representatives of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees with IDs, and both times Xia Bangyin came out to let us in, so we could face the provincial leaders and exchange views on criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. We were very familiar with the provincial leaders and talked calmly. Zhao Xinchu and others approved of this way of talking. They didn’t want society to become chaotic like the large-scale mass movement of 1969. The provincial leaders reached some consensus with us: 1. The provincial committee was actively turning, firmly criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. 2. Correctly treating the proletarian cultural revolution and the rebellious factions, all those “rolled” down should be brought back. 3. The “two clears and one batch” made mistakes of expansion (which we saw as errors in direction and路线, the rightist reversal and denial of the cultural revolution). However, opinions differed on whether rebellious leaders should be admitted into the party, promoted, or supported, and on whether the provincial party committee should follow Deng Xiaoping’s big rightist reversal, with Secretary Han Ningfu showing more opposition.
According to Lin Zizhong, Gu Jiantang, and others’ recollections: In late October 1976, Hu Houmin even twice approached Yu Wenbin[^62], the leader of the ‘Million Heroic Army.’ We and Hu Houmin both advocated cooperation with the ‘Million Heroic Army’ to deal with the ruling faction, but most rebels opposed, calling us ‘surrenderists.’
Under Hu Houmin’s call, in March 1976, rebels began to push the provincial party committee to turn. Hu Houmin assigned specific tasks: Cao Chengyi as frontline commander, Lin Zizhong as现场指挥, Yan Chang as secretary. Besides the main responsibility and staff, there were divisions for materials, propaganda, logistics, security, propaganda vehicles, briefings, engraving, slogans, water tower printing groups. Because most staff were from the new faction, Lin Zizhong joked that the counterattack against the rightist reversal was led by “new recruits with steel heads.” Under Hu Houmin’s leadership, the main actions of the rebels in Hubei in 1976 included:
-
Collect signatures from Central Committee members in Wuhan and some provincial and municipal revolutionary committee standing members to publish an open letter to the entire province, issuing critical articles and slogans, calling on the people to respond to Mao’s criticism of Deng and oppose the rightist reversal, closely linking with Hubei and Wuhan’s realities, and guiding cadres to “turn”. Most slogans were drafted by Hu Houmin’s staff team to unify thoughts and clarify main targets. Lin Zizhong and Cao Chengyi recalled: Hu Houmin attached great importance to slogans at each stage, likening it to leading troops—training daily, focusing on ideological education, preventing soldiers from idling, as without slogans, morale would drop and people would be at a loss.
-
On May 2, 1976, Zheng Jun recorded slogans and struggle strategies proposed by the staff team: “Inner tight, outer loose, promote from below, attack from above,深入基层，发动群众。” The four unchanged principles: “目标不变，湖北路线搞正，组织上要体现出来；决心不变；基调不变，也可以说是原则不变，去年七、八、九（月），是林（彪）、刘（丰）路线的继续；突破口不变，（省委第一书记、省革委会主任赵辛初1975年的）‘六四’报告（是执行邓小平的‘三项指示为纲’）。活动上灵活机动，重点在基层以革委会、（革命）领导小组为我们的活动手段。五月份争取有1/3的单位搞起来。抓点：武重、武钢、一冶、交通局、体委。” The “roll back” strategy involved: (1) urging from above, attacking from below, (2) tightening internally and loosening externally, (3) focusing on基层, and (4) unifying actions. This slogan was proposed by Gu Jiantang. It wasn’t new or invented by any individual but was based on experiences from Beijing and Shanghai during the 1974 Anti-Lin, Anti-Confucius campaign, communicated by Xia Bangyin to Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin. This phrase became the “tone” for usurpation of party power, along with Yan Chang’s “unchanged goal, resolution, tone, and breakthrough, with adaptable methods.” During the 1982-1983 trial of rebellious leaders, these were used to prosecute each person, and Shen Fuli also spent years in prison because of this. After the meeting, Peng Xun drafted several slogans as banners, and Cao Chengyi led people to plaster them across Wuhan’s three towns. Major slogans included: “Hubei has Zhao Xinchu, who spoke at the expansion meeting, waving Deng’s Shangfang sword, killing on June 4,” “June 4 speech is a poisonous weed, roll out and bring back,” “Two clears and one batch made mistakes in方向路线,” “Show mercy to rebels,” etc.
Wu Yanjin said: "What if we don’t do large-scale mass movements? We just promote the ‘turning’ within the provincial party committee on a small scale. The provincial leaders at that time dared not say they wouldn’t turn, instead they loudly shouted about ‘turning.’ The specifics of how and where to turn were the question. Hu Houmin led mass representatives from the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees twice to the provincial party committee standing committee to push for the committee. Why could we always smoothly enter the standing committee meeting? Because Xia Bangyin and Xie Wangchun, as central committee members in Wuhan, could naturally attend the meetings. When the standing committee met, Xia Bangyin would call Hu Houmin to inform him, and Hu would lead the team there, so it was a sure thing. ‘Breaking into’ the standing committee was also a charge in the sentencing. At that time, there was no real break-in, and few people wanted to break in but couldn’t. We were all representatives of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees with IDs, and both times Xia Bangyin came out to let us in, so we could face the provincial leaders and exchange views on criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. We were very familiar with the provincial leaders and talked calmly. Zhao Xinchu and others approved of this way of talking. They didn’t want society to become chaotic like the large-scale mass movement of 1969. The provincial leaders reached some consensus with us: 1. The provincial committee was actively turning, firmly criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. 2. Correctly treating the proletarian cultural revolution and the rebellious factions, all those “rolled” down should be brought back. 3. The “two clears and one batch” made mistakes of expansion (which we saw as errors in direction and路线, the rightist reversal and denial of the cultural revolution). However, opinions differed on whether rebellious leaders should be admitted into the party, promoted, or supported, and on whether the provincial party committee should follow Deng Xiaoping’s big rightist reversal, with Secretary Han Ningfu showing more opposition.
According to Lin Zizhong, Gu Jiantang, and others’ recollections: In late October 1976, Hu Houmin even twice approached Yu Wenbin[^62], the leader of the ‘Million Heroic Army.’ We and Hu Houmin both advocated cooperation with the ‘Million Heroic Army’ to deal with the ruling faction, but most rebels opposed, calling us ‘surrenderists.’
Under Hu Houmin’s call, in March 1976, rebels began to push the provincial party committee to turn. Hu Houmin assigned specific tasks: Cao Chengyi as frontline commander, Lin Zizhong as现场指挥, Yan Chang as secretary. Besides the main responsibility and staff, there were divisions for materials, propaganda, logistics, security, propaganda vehicles, briefings, engraving, slogans, water tower printing groups. Because most staff were from the new faction, Lin Zizhong joked that the counterattack against the rightist reversal was led by “new recruits with steel heads.” Under Hu Houmin’s leadership, the main actions of the rebels in Hubei in 1976 included:
-
Collect signatures from Central Committee members in Wuhan and some provincial and municipal revolutionary committee standing members to publish an open letter to the entire province, issuing critical articles and slogans, calling on the people to respond to Mao’s criticism of Deng and oppose the rightist reversal, closely linking with Hubei and Wuhan’s realities, and guiding cadres to “turn”. Most slogans were drafted by Hu Houmin’s staff team to unify thoughts and clarify main targets. Lin Zizhong and Cao Chengyi recalled: Hu Houmin attached great importance to slogans at each stage, likening it to leading troops—training daily, focusing on ideological education, preventing soldiers from idling, as without slogans, morale would drop and people would be at a loss.
-
On May 2, 1976, Zheng Jun recorded slogans and struggle strategies proposed by the staff team: “Inner tight, outer loose, promote from below, attack from above,深入基层，发动群众。” The four unchanged principles: “目标不变，湖北路线搞正，组织上要体现出来；决心不变；基调不变，也可以说是原则不变，去年七、八、九（月），是林（彪）、刘（丰）路线的继续；突破口不变，（省委第一书记、省革委会主任赵辛初1975年的）‘六四’报告（是执行邓小平的‘三项指示为纲’）。活动上灵活机动，重点在基层以革委会、（革命）领导小组为我们的活动手段。五月份争取有1/3的单位搞起来。抓点：武重、武钢、一冶、交通局、体委。” The “roll back” strategy involved: (1) urging from above, attacking from below, (2) tightening internally and loosening externally, (3) focusing on基层, and (4) unifying actions. This slogan was proposed by Gu Jiantang. It wasn’t new or invented by any individual but was based on experiences from Beijing and Shanghai during the 1974 Anti-Lin, Anti-Confucius campaign, communicated by Xia Bangyin to Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin. This phrase became the “tone” for usurpation of party power, along with Yan Chang’s “unchanged goal, resolution, tone, and breakthrough, with adaptable methods.” During the 1982-1983 trial of rebellious leaders, these were used to prosecute each person, and Shen Fuli also spent years in prison because of this. After the meeting, Peng Xun drafted several slogans as banners, and Cao Chengyi led people to plaster them across Wuhan’s three towns. Major slogans included: “Hubei has Zhao Xinchu, who spoke at the expansion meeting, waving Deng’s Shangfang sword, killing on June 4,” “June 4 speech is a poisonous weed, roll out and bring back,” “Two clears and one batch made mistakes in方向路线,” “Show mercy to rebels,” etc.
Wu Yanjin said: "What if we don’t do large-scale mass movements? We just promote the ‘turning’ within the provincial party committee on a small scale. The provincial leaders at that time dared not say they wouldn’t turn, instead they loudly shouted about ‘turning.’ The specifics of how and where to turn were the question. Hu Houmin led mass representatives from the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees twice to the provincial party committee standing committee to push for the committee. Why could we always smoothly enter the standing committee meeting? Because Xia Bangyin and Xie Wangchun, as central committee members in Wuhan, could naturally attend the meetings. When the standing committee met, Xia Bangyin would call Hu Houmin to inform him, and Hu would lead the team there, so it was a sure thing. ‘Breaking into’ the standing committee was also a charge in the sentencing. At that time, there was no real break-in, and few people wanted to break in but couldn’t. We were all representatives of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees with IDs, and both times Xia Bangyin came out to let us in, so we could face the provincial leaders and exchange views on criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. We were very familiar with the provincial leaders and talked calmly. Zhao Xinchu and others approved of this way of talking. They didn’t want society to become chaotic like the large-scale mass movement of 1969. The provincial leaders reached some consensus with us: 1. The provincial committee was actively turning, firmly criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. 2. Correctly treating the proletarian cultural revolution and the rebellious factions, all those “rolled” down should be brought back. 3. The “two clears and one batch” made mistakes of expansion (which we saw as errors in direction and路线, the rightist reversal and denial of the cultural revolution). However, opinions differed on whether rebellious leaders should be admitted into the party, promoted, or supported, and on whether the provincial party committee should follow Deng Xiaoping’s big rightist reversal, with Secretary Han Ningfu showing more opposition.
According to Lin Zizhong, Gu Jiantang, and others’ recollections: In late October 1976, Hu Houmin even twice approached Yu Wenbin[^62], the leader of the ‘Million Heroic Army.’ We and Hu Houmin both advocated cooperation with the ‘Million Heroic Army’ to deal with the ruling faction, but most rebels opposed, calling us ‘surrenderists.’
Under Hu Houmin’s call, in March 1976, rebels began to push the provincial party committee to turn. Hu Houmin assigned specific tasks: Cao Chengyi as frontline commander, Lin Zizhong as现场指挥, Yan Chang as secretary. Besides the main responsibility and staff, there were divisions for materials, propaganda, logistics, security, propaganda vehicles, briefings, engraving, slogans, water tower printing groups. Because most staff were from the new faction, Lin Zizhong joked that the counterattack against the rightist reversal was led by “new recruits with steel heads.” Under Hu Houmin’s leadership, the main actions of the rebels in Hubei in 1976 included:
-
Collect signatures from Central Committee members in Wuhan and some provincial and municipal revolutionary committee standing members to publish an open letter to the entire province, issuing critical articles and slogans, calling on the people to respond to Mao’s criticism of Deng and oppose the rightist reversal, closely linking with Hubei and Wuhan’s realities, and guiding cadres to “turn”. Most slogans were drafted by Hu Houmin’s staff team to unify thoughts and clarify main targets. Lin Zizhong and Cao Chengyi recalled: Hu Houmin attached great importance to slogans at each stage, likening it to leading troops—training daily, focusing on ideological education, preventing soldiers from idling, as without slogans, morale would drop and people would be at a loss.
-
On May 2, 1976, Zheng Jun recorded slogans and struggle strategies proposed by the staff team: “Inner tight, outer loose, promote from below, attack from above,深入基层，发动群众。” The four unchanged principles: “目标不变，湖北路线搞正，组织上要体现出来；决心不变；基调不变，也可以说是原则不变，去年七、八、九（月），是林（彪）、刘（丰）路线的继续；突破口不变，（省委第一书记、省革委会主任赵辛初1975年的）‘六四’报告（是执行邓小平的‘三项指示为纲’）。活动上灵活机动，重点在基层以革委会、（革命）领导小组为我们的活动手段。五月份争取有1/3的单位搞起来。抓点：武重、武钢、一冶、交通局、体委。” The “roll back” strategy involved: (1) urging from above, attacking from below, (2) tightening internally and loosening externally, (3) focusing on基层, and (4) unifying actions. This slogan was proposed by Gu Jiantang. It wasn’t new or invented by any individual but was based on experiences from Beijing and Shanghai during the 1974 Anti-Lin, Anti-Confucius campaign, communicated by Xia Bangyin to Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin. This phrase became the “tone” for usurpation of party power, along with Yan Chang’s “unchanged goal, resolution, tone, and breakthrough, with adaptable methods.” During the 1982-1983 trial of rebellious leaders, these were used to prosecute each person, and Shen Fuli also spent years in prison because of this. After the meeting, Peng Xun drafted several slogans as banners, and Cao Chengyi led people to plaster them across Wuhan’s three towns. Major slogans included: “Hubei has Zhao Xinchu, who spoke at the expansion meeting, waving Deng’s Shangfang sword, killing on June 4,” “June 4 speech is a poisonous weed, roll out and bring back,” “Two clears and one batch made mistakes in方向路线,” “Show mercy to rebels,” etc.
Wu Yanjin said: "What if we don’t do large-scale mass movements? We just promote the ‘turning’ within the provincial party committee on a small scale. The provincial leaders at that time dared not say they wouldn’t turn, instead they loudly shouted about ‘turning.’ The specifics of how and where to turn were the question. Hu Houmin led mass representatives from the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees twice to the provincial party committee standing committee to push for the committee. Why could we always smoothly enter the standing committee meeting? Because Xia Bangyin and Xie Wangchun, as central committee members in Wuhan, could naturally attend the meetings. When the standing committee met, Xia Bangyin would call Hu Houmin to inform him, and Hu would lead the team there, so it was a sure thing. ‘Breaking into’ the standing committee was also a charge in the sentencing. At that time, there was no real break-in, and few people wanted to break in but couldn’t. We were all representatives of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees with IDs, and both times Xia Bangyin came out to let us in, so we could face the provincial leaders and exchange views on criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. We were very familiar with the provincial leaders and talked calmly. Zhao Xinchu and others approved of this way of talking. They didn’t want society to become chaotic like the large-scale mass movement of 1969. The provincial leaders reached some consensus with us: 1. The provincial committee was actively turning, firmly criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. 2. Correctly treating the proletarian cultural revolution and the rebellious factions, all those “rolled” down should be brought back. 3. The “two clears and one batch” made mistakes of expansion (which we saw as errors in direction and路线, the rightist reversal and denial of the cultural revolution). However, opinions differed on whether rebellious leaders should be admitted into the party, promoted, or supported, and on whether the provincial party committee should follow Deng Xiaoping’s big rightist reversal, with Secretary Han Ningfu showing more opposition.
According to Lin Zizhong, Gu Jiantang, and others’ recollections: In late October 1976, Hu Houmin even twice approached Yu Wenbin[^62], the leader of the ‘Million Heroic Army.’ We and Hu Houmin both advocated cooperation with the ‘Million Heroic Army’ to deal with the ruling faction, but most rebels opposed, calling us ‘surrenderists.’
Under Hu Houmin’s call, in March 1976, rebels began to push the provincial party committee to turn. Hu Houmin assigned specific tasks: Cao Chengyi as frontline commander, Lin Zizhong as现场指挥, Yan Chang as secretary. Besides the main responsibility and staff, there were divisions for materials, propaganda, logistics, security, propaganda vehicles, briefings, engraving, slogans, water tower printing groups. Because most staff were from the new faction, Lin Zizhong joked that the counterattack against the rightist reversal was led by “new recruits with steel heads.” Under Hu Houmin’s leadership, the main actions of the rebels in Hubei in 1976 included:
-
Collect signatures from Central Committee members in Wuhan and some provincial and municipal revolutionary committee standing members to publish an open letter to the entire province, issuing critical articles and slogans, calling on the people to respond to Mao’s criticism of Deng and oppose the rightist reversal, closely linking with Hubei and Wuhan’s realities, and guiding cadres to “turn”. Most slogans were drafted by Hu Houmin’s staff team to unify thoughts and clarify main targets. Lin Zizhong and Cao Chengyi recalled: Hu Houmin attached great importance to slogans at each stage, likening it to leading troops—training daily, focusing on ideological education, preventing soldiers from idling, as without slogans, morale would drop and people would be at a loss.
-
On May 2, 1976, Zheng Jun recorded slogans and struggle strategies proposed by the staff team: “Inner tight, outer loose, promote from below, attack from above,深入基层，发动群众。” The four unchanged principles: “目标不变，湖北路线搞正，组织上要体现出来；决心不变；基调不变，也可以说是原则不变，去年七、八、九（月），是林（彪）、刘（丰）路线的继续；突破口不变，（省委第一书记、省革委会主任赵辛初1975年的）‘六四’报告（是执行邓小平的‘三项指示为纲’）。活动上灵活机动，重点在基层以革委会、（革命）领导小组为我们的活动手段。五月份争取有1/3的单位搞起来。抓点：武重、武钢、一冶、交通局、体委。” The “roll back” strategy involved: (1) urging from above, attacking from below, (2) tightening internally and loosening externally, (3) focusing on基层, and (4) unifying actions. This slogan was proposed by Gu Jiantang. It wasn’t new or invented by any individual but was based on experiences from Beijing and Shanghai during the 1974 Anti-Lin, Anti-Confucius campaign, communicated by Xia Bangyin to Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin. This phrase became the “tone” for usurpation of party power, along with Yan Chang’s “unchanged goal, resolution, tone, and breakthrough, with adaptable methods.” During the 1982-1983 trial of rebellious leaders, these were used to prosecute each person, and Shen Fuli also spent years in prison because of this. After the meeting, Peng Xun drafted several slogans as banners, and Cao Chengyi led people to plaster them across Wuhan’s three towns. Major slogans included: “Hubei has Zhao Xinchu, who spoke at the expansion meeting, waving Deng’s Shangfang sword, killing on June 4,” “June 4 speech is a poisonous weed, roll out and bring back,” “Two clears and one batch made mistakes in方向路线,” “Show mercy to rebels,” etc.
Wu Yanjin said: "What if we don’t do large-scale mass movements? We just promote the ‘turning’ within the provincial party committee on a small scale. The provincial leaders at that time dared not say they wouldn’t turn, instead they loudly shouted about ‘turning.’ The specifics of how and where to turn were the question. Hu Houmin led mass representatives from the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees twice to the provincial party committee standing committee to push for the committee. Why could we always smoothly enter the standing committee meeting? Because Xia Bangyin and Xie Wangchun, as central committee members in Wuhan, could naturally attend the meetings. When the standing committee met, Xia Bangyin would call Hu Houmin to inform him, and Hu would lead the team there, so it was a sure thing. ‘Breaking into’ the standing committee was also a charge in the sentencing. At that time, there was no real break-in, and few people wanted to break in but couldn’t. We were all representatives of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees with IDs, and both times Xia Bangyin came out to let us in, so we could face the provincial leaders and exchange views on criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. We were very familiar with the provincial leaders and talked calmly. Zhao Xinchu and others approved of this way of talking. They didn’t want society to become chaotic like the large-scale mass movement of 1969. The provincial leaders reached some consensus with us: 1. The provincial committee was actively turning, firmly criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. 2. Correctly treating the proletarian cultural revolution and the rebellious factions, all those “rolled” down should be brought back. 3. The “two clears and one batch” made mistakes of expansion (which we saw as errors in direction and路线, the rightist reversal and denial of the cultural revolution). However, opinions differed on whether rebellious leaders should be admitted into the party, promoted, or supported, and on whether the provincial party committee should follow Deng Xiaoping’s big rightist reversal, with Secretary Han Ningfu showing more opposition.
According to Lin Zizhong, Gu Jiantang, and others’ recollections: In late October 1976, Hu Houmin even twice approached Yu Wenbin[^62], the leader of the ‘Million Heroic Army.’ We and Hu Houmin both advocated cooperation with the ‘Million Heroic Army’ to deal with the ruling faction, but most rebels opposed, calling us ‘surrenderists.’
Under Hu Houmin’s call, in March 1976, rebels began to push the provincial party committee to turn. Hu Houmin assigned specific tasks: Cao Chengyi as frontline commander, Lin Zizhong as现场指挥, Yan Chang as secretary. Besides the main responsibility and staff, there were divisions for materials, propaganda, logistics, security, propaganda vehicles, briefings, engraving, slogans, water tower printing groups. Because most staff were from the new faction, Lin Zizhong joked that the counterattack against the rightist reversal was led by “new recruits with steel heads.” Under Hu Houmin’s leadership, the main actions of the rebels in Hubei in 1976 included:
-
Collect signatures from Central Committee members in Wuhan and some provincial and municipal revolutionary committee standing members to publish an open letter to the entire province, issuing critical articles and slogans, calling on the people to respond to Mao’s criticism of Deng and oppose the rightist reversal, closely linking with Hubei and Wuhan’s realities, and guiding cadres to “turn”. Most slogans were drafted by Hu Houmin’s staff team to unify thoughts and clarify main targets. Lin Zizhong and Cao Chengyi recalled: Hu Houmin attached great importance to slogans at each stage, likening it to leading troops—training daily, focusing on ideological education, preventing soldiers from idling, as without slogans, morale would drop and people would be at a loss.
-
On May 2, 1976, Zheng Jun recorded slogans and struggle strategies proposed by the staff team: “Inner tight, outer loose, promote from below, attack from above,深入基层，发动群众。” The four unchanged principles: “目标不变，湖北路线搞正，组织上要体现出来；决心不变；基调不变，也可以说是原则不变，去年七、八、九（月），是林（彪）、刘（丰）路线的继续；突破口不变，（省委第一书记、省革委会主任赵辛初1975年的）‘六四’报告（是执行邓小平的‘三项指示为纲’）。活动上灵活机动，重点在基层以革委会、（革命）领导小组为我们的活动手段。五月份争取有1/3的单位搞起来。抓点：武重、武钢、一冶、交通局、体委。” The “roll back” strategy involved: (1) urging from above, attacking from below, (2) tightening internally and loosening externally, (3) focusing on基层, and (4) unifying actions. This slogan was proposed by Gu Jiantang. It wasn’t new or invented by any individual but was based on experiences from Beijing and Shanghai during the 1974 Anti-Lin, Anti-Confucius campaign, communicated by Xia Bangyin to Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin. This phrase became the “tone” for usurpation of party power, along with Yan Chang’s “unchanged goal, resolution, tone, and breakthrough, with adaptable methods.” During the 1982-1983 trial of rebellious leaders, these were used to prosecute each person, and Shen Fuli also spent years in prison because of this. After the meeting, Peng Xun drafted several slogans as banners, and Cao Chengyi led people to plaster them across Wuhan’s three towns. Major slogans included: “Hubei has Zhao Xinchu, who spoke at the expansion meeting, waving Deng’s Shangfang sword, killing on June 4,” “June 4 speech is a poisonous weed, roll out and bring back,” “Two clears and one batch made mistakes in方向路线,” “Show mercy to rebels,” etc.
Wu Yanjin said: "What if we don’t do large-scale mass movements? We just promote the ‘turning’ within the provincial party committee on a small scale. The provincial leaders at that time dared not say they wouldn’t turn, instead they loudly shouted about ‘turning.’ The specifics of how and where to turn were the question. Hu Houmin led mass representatives from the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees twice to the provincial party committee standing committee to push for the committee. Why could we always smoothly enter the standing committee meeting? Because Xia Bangyin and Xie Wangchun, as central committee members in Wuhan, could naturally attend the meetings. When the standing committee met, Xia Bangyin would call Hu Houmin to inform him, and Hu would lead the team there, so it was a sure thing. ‘Breaking into’ the standing committee was also a charge in the sentencing. At that time, there was no real break-in, and few people wanted to break in but couldn’t. We were all representatives of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees with IDs, and both times Xia Bangyin came out to let us in, so we could face the provincial leaders and exchange views on criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. We were very familiar with the provincial leaders and talked calmly. Zhao Xinchu and others approved of this way of talking. They didn’t want society to become chaotic like the large-scale mass movement of 1969. The provincial leaders reached some consensus with us: 1. The provincial committee was actively turning, firmly criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. 2. Correctly treating the proletarian cultural revolution and the rebellious factions, all those “rolled” down should be brought back. 3. The “two clears and one batch” made mistakes of expansion (which we saw as errors in direction and路线, the rightist reversal and denial of the cultural revolution). However, opinions differed on whether rebellious leaders should be admitted into the party, promoted, or supported, and on whether the provincial party committee should follow Deng Xiaoping’s big rightist reversal, with Secretary Han Ningfu showing more opposition.
According to Lin Zizhong, Gu Jiantang, and others’ recollections: In late October 1976, Hu Houmin even twice approached Yu Wenbin[^62], the leader of the ‘Million Heroic Army.’ We and Hu Houmin both advocated cooperation with the ‘Million Heroic Army’ to deal with the ruling faction, but most rebels opposed, calling us ‘surrenderists.’
Under Hu Houmin’s call, in March 1976, rebels began to push the provincial party committee to turn. Hu Houmin assigned specific tasks: Cao Chengyi as frontline commander, Lin Zizhong as现场指挥, Yan Chang as secretary. Besides the main responsibility and staff, there were divisions for materials, propaganda, logistics, security, propaganda vehicles, briefings, engraving, slogans, water tower printing groups. Because most staff were from the new faction, Lin Zizhong joked that the counterattack against the rightist reversal was led by “new recruits with steel heads.” Under Hu Houmin’s leadership, the main actions of the rebels in Hubei in 1976 included:
-
Collect signatures from Central Committee members in Wuhan and some provincial and municipal revolutionary committee standing members to publish an open letter to the entire province, issuing critical articles and slogans, calling on the people to respond to Mao’s criticism of Deng and oppose the rightist reversal, closely linking with Hubei and Wuhan’s realities, and guiding cadres to “turn”. Most slogans were drafted by Hu Houmin’s staff team to unify thoughts and clarify main targets. Lin Zizhong and Cao Chengyi recalled: Hu Houmin attached great importance to slogans at each stage, likening it to leading troops—training daily, focusing on ideological education, preventing soldiers from idling, as without slogans, morale would drop and people would be at a loss.
-
On May 2, 1976, Zheng Jun recorded slogans and struggle strategies proposed by the staff team: “Inner tight, outer loose, promote from below, attack from above,深入基层，发动群众。” The four unchanged principles: “目标不变，湖北路线搞正，组织上要体现出来；决心不变；基调不变，也可以说是原则不变，去年七、八、九（月），是林（彪）、刘（丰）路线的继续；突破口不变，（省委第一书记、省革委会主任赵辛初1975年的）‘六四’报告（是执行邓小平的‘三项指示为纲’）。活动上灵活机动，重点在基层以革委会、（革命）领导小组为我们的活动手段。五月份争取有1/3的单位搞起来。抓点：武重、武钢、一冶、交通局、体委。” The “roll back” strategy involved: (1) urging from above, attacking from below, (2) tightening internally and loosening externally, (3) focusing on基层, and (4) unifying actions. This slogan was proposed by Gu Jiantang. It wasn’t new or invented by any individual but was based on experiences from Beijing and Shanghai during the 1974 Anti-Lin, Anti-Confucius campaign, communicated by Xia Bangyin to Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin. This phrase became the “tone” for usurpation of party power, along with Yan Chang’s “unchanged goal, resolution, tone, and breakthrough, with adaptable methods.” During the 1982-1983 trial of rebellious leaders, these were used to prosecute each person, and Shen Fuli also spent years in prison because of this. After the meeting, Peng Xun drafted several slogans as banners, and Cao Chengyi led people to plaster them across Wuhan’s three towns. Major slogans included: “Hubei has Zhao Xinchu, who spoke at the expansion meeting, waving Deng’s Shangfang sword, killing on June 4,” “June 4 speech is a poisonous weed, roll out and bring back,” “Two clears and one batch made mistakes in方向路线,” “Show mercy to rebels,” etc.
Wu Yanjin said: "What if we don’t do large-scale mass movements? We just promote the ‘turning’ within the provincial party committee on a small scale. The provincial leaders at that time dared not say they wouldn’t turn, instead they loudly shouted about ‘turning.’ The specifics of how and where to turn were the question. Hu Houmin led mass representatives from the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees twice to the provincial party committee standing committee to push for the committee. Why could we always smoothly enter the standing committee meeting? Because Xia Bangyin and Xie Wangchun, as central committee members in Wuhan, could naturally attend the meetings. When the standing committee met, Xia Bangyin would call Hu Houmin to inform him, and Hu would lead the team there, so it was a sure thing. ‘Breaking into’ the standing committee was also a charge in the sentencing. At that time, there was no real break-in, and few people wanted to break in but couldn’t. We were all representatives of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees with IDs, and both times Xia Bangyin came out to let us in, so we could face the provincial leaders and exchange views on criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. We were very familiar with the provincial leaders and talked calmly. Zhao Xinchu and others approved of this way of talking. They didn’t want society to become chaotic like the large-scale mass movement of 1969. The provincial leaders reached some consensus with us: 1. The provincial committee was actively turning, firmly criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. 2. Correctly treating the proletarian cultural revolution and the rebellious factions, all those “rolled” down should be brought back. 3. The “two clears and one batch” made mistakes of expansion (which we saw as errors in direction and路线, the rightist reversal and denial of the cultural revolution). However, opinions differed on whether rebellious leaders should be admitted into the party, promoted, or supported, and on whether the provincial party committee should follow Deng Xiaoping’s big rightist reversal, with Secretary Han Ningfu showing more opposition.
According to Lin Zizhong, Gu Jiantang, and others’ recollections: In late October 1976, Hu Houmin even twice approached Yu Wenbin[^62], the leader of the ‘Million Heroic Army.’ We and Hu Houmin both advocated cooperation with the ‘Million Heroic Army’ to deal with the ruling faction, but most rebels opposed, calling us ‘surrenderists.’
Under Hu Houmin’s call, in March 1976, rebels began to push the provincial party committee to turn. Hu Houmin assigned specific tasks: Cao Chengyi as frontline commander, Lin Zizhong as现场指挥, Yan Chang as secretary. Besides the main responsibility and staff, there were divisions for materials, propaganda, logistics, security, propaganda vehicles, briefings, engraving, slogans, water tower printing groups. Because most staff were from the new faction, Lin Zizhong joked that the counterattack against the rightist reversal was led by “new recruits with steel heads.” Under Hu Houmin’s leadership, the main actions of the rebels in Hubei in 1976 included:
-
Collect signatures from Central Committee members in Wuhan and some provincial and municipal revolutionary committee standing members to publish an open letter to the entire province, issuing critical articles and slogans, calling on the people to respond to Mao’s criticism of Deng and oppose the rightist reversal, closely linking with Hubei and Wuhan’s realities, and guiding cadres to “turn”. Most slogans were drafted by Hu Houmin’s staff team to unify thoughts and clarify main targets. Lin Zizhong and Cao Chengyi recalled: Hu Houmin attached great importance to slogans at each stage, likening it to leading troops—training daily, focusing on ideological education, preventing soldiers from idling, as without slogans, morale would drop and people would be at a loss.
-
On May 2, 1976, Zheng Jun recorded slogans and struggle strategies proposed by the staff team: “Inner tight, outer loose, promote from below, attack from above,深入基层，发动群众。” The four unchanged principles: “目标不变，湖北路线搞正，组织上要体现出来；决心不变；基调不变，也可以说是原则不变，去年七、八、九（月），是林（彪）、刘（丰）路线的继续；突破口不变，（省委第一书记、省革委会主任赵辛初1975年的）‘六四’报告（是执行邓小平的‘三项指示为纲’）。活动上灵活机动，重点在基层以革委会、（革命）领导小组为我们的活动手段。五月份争取有1/3的单位搞起来。抓点：武重、武钢、一冶、交通局、体委。” The “roll back” strategy involved: (1) urging from above, attacking from below, (2) tightening internally and loosening externally, (3) focusing on基层, and (4) unifying actions. This slogan was proposed by Gu Jiantang. It wasn’t new or invented by any individual but was based on experiences from Beijing and Shanghai during the 1974 Anti-Lin, Anti-Confucius campaign, communicated by Xia Bangyin to Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin. This phrase became the “tone” for usurpation of party power, along with Yan Chang’s “unchanged goal, resolution, tone, and breakthrough, with adaptable methods.” During the 1982-1983 trial of rebellious leaders, these were used to prosecute each person, and Shen Fuli also spent years in prison because of this. After the meeting, Peng Xun drafted several slogans as banners, and Cao Chengyi led people to plaster them across Wuhan’s three towns. Major slogans included: “Hubei has Zhao Xinchu, who spoke at the expansion meeting, waving Deng’s Shangfang sword, killing on June 4,” “June 4 speech is a poisonous weed, roll out and bring back,” “Two clears and one batch made mistakes in方向路线,” “Show mercy to rebels,” etc.
Wu Yanjin said: "What if we don’t do large-scale mass movements? We just promote the ‘turning’ within the provincial party committee on a small scale. The provincial leaders at that time dared not say they wouldn’t turn, instead they loudly shouted about ‘turning.’ The specifics of how and where to turn were the question. Hu Houmin led mass representatives from the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees twice to the provincial party committee standing committee to push for the committee. Why could we always smoothly enter the standing committee meeting? Because Xia Bangyin and Xie Wangchun, as central committee members in Wuhan, could naturally attend the meetings. When the standing committee met, Xia Bangyin would call Hu Houmin to inform him, and Hu would lead the team there, so it was a sure thing. ‘Breaking into’ the standing committee was also a charge in the sentencing. At that time, there was no real break-in, and few people wanted to break in but couldn’t. We were all representatives of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees with IDs, and both times Xia Bangyin came out to let us in, so we could face the provincial leaders and exchange views on criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. We were very familiar with the provincial leaders and talked calmly. Zhao Xinchu and others approved of this way of talking. They didn’t want society to become chaotic like the large-scale mass movement of 1969. The provincial leaders reached some consensus with us: 1. The provincial committee was actively turning, firmly criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. 2. Correctly treating the proletarian cultural revolution and the rebellious factions, all those “rolled” down should be brought back. 3. The “two clears and one batch” made mistakes of expansion (which we saw as errors in direction and路线, the rightist reversal and denial of the cultural revolution). However, opinions differed on whether rebellious leaders should be admitted into the party, promoted, or supported, and on whether the provincial party committee should follow Deng Xiaoping’s big rightist reversal, with Secretary Han Ningfu showing more opposition.
According to Lin Zizhong, Gu Jiantang, and others’ recollections: In late October 1976, Hu Houmin even twice approached Yu Wenbin[^62], the leader of the ‘Million Heroic Army.’ We and Hu Houmin both advocated cooperation with the ‘Million Heroic Army’ to deal with the ruling faction, but most rebels opposed, calling us ‘surrenderists.’
Under Hu Houmin’s call, in March 1976, rebels began to push the provincial party committee to turn. Hu Houmin assigned specific tasks: Cao Chengyi as frontline commander, Lin Zizhong as现场指挥, Yan Chang as secretary. Besides the main responsibility and staff, there were divisions for materials, propaganda, logistics, security, propaganda vehicles, briefings, engraving, slogans, water tower printing groups. Because most staff were from the new faction, Lin Zizhong joked that the counterattack against the rightist reversal was led by “new recruits with steel heads.” Under Hu Houmin’s leadership, the main actions of the rebels in Hubei in 1976 included:
-
Collect signatures from Central Committee members in Wuhan and some provincial and municipal revolutionary committee standing members to publish an open letter to the entire province, issuing critical articles and slogans, calling on the people to respond to Mao’s criticism of Deng and oppose the rightist reversal, closely linking with Hubei and Wuhan’s realities, and guiding cadres to “turn”. Most slogans were drafted by Hu Houmin’s staff team to unify thoughts and clarify main targets. Lin Zizhong and Cao Chengyi recalled: Hu Houmin attached great importance to slogans at each stage, likening it to leading troops—training daily, focusing on ideological education, preventing soldiers from idling, as without slogans, morale would drop and people would be at a loss.
-
On May 2, 1976, Zheng Jun recorded slogans and struggle strategies proposed by the staff team: “Inner tight, outer loose, promote from below, attack from above,深入基层，发动群众。” The four unchanged principles: “目标不变，湖北路线搞正，组织上要体现出来；决心不变；基调不变，也可以说是原则不变，去年七、八、九（月），是林（彪）、刘（丰）路线的继续；突破口不变，（省委第一书记、省革委会主任赵辛初1975年的）‘六四’报告（是执行邓小平的‘三项指示为纲’）。活动上灵活机动，重点在基层以革委会、（革命）领导小组为我们的活动手段。五月份争取有1/3的单位搞起来。抓点：武重、武钢、一冶、交通局、体委。” The “roll back” strategy involved: (1) urging from above, attacking from below, (2) tightening internally and loosening externally, (3) focusing on基层, and (4) unifying actions. This slogan was proposed by Gu Jiantang. It wasn’t new or invented by any individual but was based on experiences from Beijing and Shanghai during the 1974 Anti-Lin, Anti-Confucius campaign, communicated by Xia Bangyin to Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin. This phrase became the “tone” for usurpation of party power, along with Yan Chang’s “unchanged goal, resolution, tone, and breakthrough, with adaptable methods.” During the 1982-1983 trial of rebellious leaders, these were used to prosecute each person, and Shen Fuli also spent years in prison because of this. After the meeting, Peng Xun drafted several slogans as banners, and Cao Chengyi led people to plaster them across Wuhan’s three towns. Major slogans included: “Hubei has Zhao Xinchu, who spoke at the expansion meeting, waving Deng’s Shangfang sword, killing on June 4,” “June 4 speech is a poisonous weed, roll out and bring back,” “Two clears and one batch made mistakes in方向路线,” “Show mercy to rebels,” etc.
Wu Yanjin said: "What if we don’t do large-scale mass movements? We just promote the ‘turning’ within the provincial party committee on a small scale. The provincial leaders at that time dared not say they wouldn’t turn, instead they loudly shouted about ‘turning.’ The specifics of how and where to turn were the question. Hu Houmin led mass representatives from the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees twice to the provincial party committee standing committee to push for the committee. Why could we always smoothly enter the standing committee meeting? Because Xia Bangyin and Xie Wangchun, as central committee members in Wuhan, could naturally attend the meetings. When the standing committee met, Xia Bangyin would call Hu Houmin to inform him, and Hu would lead the team there, so it was a sure thing. ‘Breaking into’ the standing committee was also a charge in the sentencing. At that time, there was no real break-in, and few people wanted to break in but couldn’t. We were all representatives of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees with IDs, and both times Xia Bangyin came out to let us in, so we could face the provincial leaders and exchange views on criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. We were very familiar with the provincial leaders and talked calmly. Zhao Xinchu and others approved of this way of talking. They didn’t want society to become chaotic like the large-scale mass movement of 1969. The provincial leaders reached some consensus with us: 1. The provincial committee was actively turning, firmly criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. 2. Correctly treating the proletarian cultural revolution and the rebellious factions, all those “rolled” down should be brought back. 3. The “two clears and one batch” made mistakes of expansion (which we saw as errors in direction and路线, the rightist reversal and denial of the cultural revolution). However, opinions differed on whether rebellious leaders should be admitted into the party, promoted, or supported, and on whether the provincial party committee should follow Deng Xiaoping’s big rightist reversal, with Secretary Han Ningfu showing more opposition.
According to Lin Zizhong, Gu Jiantang, and others’ recollections: In late October 1976, Hu Houmin even twice approached Yu Wenbin[^62], the leader of the ‘Million Heroic Army.’ We and Hu Houmin both advocated cooperation with the ‘Million Heroic Army’ to deal with the ruling faction, but most rebels opposed, calling us ‘surrenderists.’
Under Hu Houmin’s call, in March 1976, rebels began to push the provincial party committee to turn. Hu Houmin assigned specific tasks: Cao Chengyi as frontline commander, Lin Zizhong as现场指挥, Yan Chang as secretary. Besides the main responsibility and staff, there were divisions for materials, propaganda, logistics, security, propaganda vehicles, briefings, engraving, slogans, water tower printing groups. Because most staff were from the new faction, Lin Zizhong joked that the counterattack against the rightist reversal was led by “new recruits with steel heads.” Under Hu Houmin’s leadership, the main actions of the rebels in Hubei in 1976 included:
-
Collect signatures from Central Committee members in Wuhan and some provincial and municipal revolutionary committee standing members to publish an open letter to the entire province, issuing critical articles and slogans, calling on the people to respond to Mao’s criticism of Deng and oppose the rightist reversal, closely linking with Hubei and Wuhan’s realities, and guiding cadres to “turn”. Most slogans were drafted by Hu Houmin’s staff team to unify thoughts and clarify main targets. Lin Zizhong and Cao Chengyi recalled: Hu Houmin attached great importance to slogans at each stage, likening it to leading troops—training daily, focusing on ideological education, preventing soldiers from idling, as without slogans, morale would drop and people would be at a loss.
-
On May 2, 1976, Zheng Jun recorded slogans and struggle strategies proposed by the staff team: “Inner tight, outer loose, promote from below, attack from above,深入基层，发动群众。” The four unchanged principles: “目标不变，湖北路线搞正，组织上要体现出来；决心不变；基调不变，也可以说是原则不变，去年七、八、九（月），是林（彪）、刘（丰）路线的继续；突破口不变，（省委第一书记、省革委会主任赵辛初1975年的）‘六四’报告（是执行邓小平的‘三项指示为纲’）。活动上灵活机动，重点在基层以革委会、（革命）领导小组为我们的活动手段。五月份争取有1/3的单位搞起来。抓点：武重、武钢、一冶、交通局、体委。” The “roll back” strategy involved: (1) urging from above, attacking from below, (2) tightening internally and loosening externally, (3) focusing on基层, and (4) unifying actions. This slogan was proposed by Gu Jiantang. It wasn’t new or invented by any individual but was based on experiences from Beijing and Shanghai during the 1974 Anti-Lin, Anti-Confucius campaign, communicated by Xia Bangyin to Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin. This phrase became the “tone” for usurpation of party power, along with Yan Chang’s “unchanged goal, resolution, tone, and breakthrough, with adaptable methods.” During the 1982-1983 trial of rebellious leaders, these were used to prosecute each person, and Shen Fuli also spent years in prison because of this. After the meeting, Peng Xun drafted several slogans as banners, and Cao Chengyi led people to plaster them across Wuhan’s three towns. Major slogans included: “Hubei has Zhao Xinchu, who spoke at the expansion meeting, waving Deng’s Shangfang sword, killing on June 4,” “June 4 speech is a poisonous weed, roll out and bring back,” “Two clears and one batch made mistakes in方向路线,” “Show mercy to rebels,” etc.
Wu Yanjin said: "What if we don’t do large-scale mass movements? We just promote the ‘turning’ within the provincial party committee on a small scale. The provincial leaders at that time dared not say they wouldn’t turn, instead they loudly shouted about ‘turning.’ The specifics of how and where to turn were the question. Hu Houmin led mass representatives from the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees twice to the provincial party committee standing committee to push for the committee. Why could we always smoothly enter the standing committee meeting? Because Xia Bangyin and Xie Wangchun, as central committee members in Wuhan, could naturally attend the meetings. When the standing committee met, Xia Bangyin would call Hu Houmin to inform him, and Hu would lead the team there, so it was a sure thing. ‘Breaking into’ the standing committee was also a charge in the sentencing. At that time, there was no real break-in, and few people wanted to break in but couldn’t. We were all representatives of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees with IDs, and both times Xia Bangyin came out to let us in, so we could face the provincial leaders and exchange views on criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. We were very familiar with the provincial leaders and talked calmly. Zhao Xinchu and others approved of this way of talking. They didn’t want society to become chaotic like the large-scale mass movement of 1969. The provincial leaders reached some consensus with us: 1. The provincial committee was actively turning, firmly criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. 2. Correctly treating the proletarian cultural revolution and the rebellious factions, all those “rolled” down should be brought back. 3. The “two clears and one batch” made mistakes of expansion (which we saw as errors in direction and路线, the rightist reversal and denial of the cultural revolution). However, opinions differed on whether rebellious leaders should be admitted into the party, promoted, or supported, and on whether the provincial party committee should follow Deng Xiaoping’s big rightist reversal, with Secretary Han Ningfu showing more opposition.
According to Lin Zizhong, Gu Jiantang, and others’ recollections: In late October 1976, Hu Houmin even twice approached Yu Wenbin[^62], the leader of the ‘Million Heroic Army.’ We and Hu Houmin both advocated cooperation with the ‘Million Heroic Army’ to deal with the ruling faction, but most rebels opposed, calling us ‘surrenderists.’
Under Hu Houmin’s call, in March 1976, rebels began to push the provincial party committee to turn. Hu Houmin assigned specific tasks: Cao Chengyi as frontline commander, Lin Zizhong as现场指挥, Yan Chang as secretary. Besides the main responsibility and staff, there were divisions for materials, propaganda, logistics, security, propaganda vehicles, briefings, engraving, slogans, water tower printing groups. Because most staff were from the new faction, Lin Zizhong joked that the counterattack against the rightist reversal was led by “new recruits with steel heads.” Under Hu Houmin’s leadership, the main actions of the rebels in Hubei in 1976 included:
-
Collect signatures from Central Committee members in Wuhan and some provincial and municipal revolutionary committee standing members to publish an open letter to the entire province, issuing critical articles and slogans, calling on the people to respond to Mao’s criticism of Deng and oppose the rightist reversal, closely linking with Hubei and Wuhan’s realities, and guiding cadres to “turn”. Most slogans were drafted by Hu Houmin’s staff team to unify thoughts and clarify main targets. Lin Zizhong and Cao Chengyi recalled: Hu Houmin attached great importance to slogans at each stage, likening it to leading troops—training daily, focusing on ideological education, preventing soldiers from idling, as without slogans, morale would drop and people would be at a loss.
-
On May 2, 1976, Zheng Jun recorded slogans and struggle strategies proposed by the staff team: “Inner tight, outer loose, promote from below, attack from above,深入基层，发动群众。” The four unchanged principles: “目标不变，湖北路线搞正，组织上要体现出来；决心不变；基调不变，也可以说是原则不变，去年七、八、九（月），是林（彪）、刘（丰）路线的继续；突破口不变，（省委第一书记、省革委会主任赵辛初1975年的）‘六四’报告（是执行邓小平的‘三项指示为纲’）。活动上灵活机动，重点在基层以革委会、（革命）领导小组为我们的活动手段。五月份争取有1/3的单位搞起来。抓点：武重、武钢、一冶、交通局、体委。” The “roll back” strategy involved: (1) urging from above, attacking from below, (2) tightening internally and loosening externally, (3) focusing on基层, and (4) unifying actions. This slogan was proposed by Gu Jiantang. It wasn’t new or invented by any individual but was based on experiences from Beijing and Shanghai during the 1974 Anti-Lin, Anti-Confucius campaign, communicated by Xia Bangyin to Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin. This phrase became the “tone” for usurpation of party power, along with Yan Chang’s “unchanged goal, resolution, tone, and breakthrough, with adaptable methods.” During the 1982-1983 trial of rebellious leaders, these were used to prosecute each person, and Shen Fuli also spent years in prison because of this. After the meeting, Peng Xun drafted several slogans as banners, and Cao Chengyi led people to plaster them across Wuhan’s three towns. Major slogans included: “Hubei has Zhao Xinchu, who spoke at the expansion meeting, waving Deng’s Shangfang sword, killing on June 4,” “June 4 speech is a poisonous weed, roll out and bring back,” “Two clears and one batch made mistakes in方向路线,” “Show mercy to rebels,” etc.
Wu Yanjin said: "What if we don’t do large-scale mass movements? We just promote the ‘turning’ within the provincial party committee on a small scale. The provincial leaders at that time dared not say they wouldn’t turn, instead they loudly shouted about ‘turning.’ The specifics of how and where to turn were the question. Hu Houmin led mass representatives from the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees twice to the provincial party committee standing committee to push for the committee. Why could we always smoothly enter the standing committee meeting? Because Xia Bangyin and Xie Wangchun, as central committee members in Wuhan, could naturally attend the meetings. When the standing committee met, Xia Bangyin would call Hu Houmin to inform him, and Hu would lead the team there, so it was a sure thing. ‘Breaking into’ the standing committee was also a charge in the sentencing. At that time, there was no real break-in, and few people wanted to break in but couldn’t. We were all representatives of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees with IDs, and both times Xia Bangyin came out to let us in, so we could face the provincial leaders and exchange views on criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. We were very familiar with the provincial leaders and talked calmly. Zhao Xinchu and others approved of this way of talking. They didn’t want society to become chaotic like the large-scale mass movement of 1969. The provincial leaders reached some consensus with us: 1. The provincial committee was actively turning, firmly criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. 2. Correctly treating the proletarian cultural revolution and the rebellious factions, all those “rolled” down should be brought back. 3. The “two clears and one batch” made mistakes of expansion (which we saw as errors in direction and路线, the rightist reversal and denial of the cultural revolution). However, opinions differed on whether rebellious leaders should be admitted into the party, promoted, or supported, and on whether the provincial party committee should follow Deng Xiaoping’s big rightist reversal, with Secretary Han Ningfu showing more opposition.
According to Lin Zizhong, Gu Jiantang, and others’ recollections: In late October 1976, Hu Houmin even twice approached Yu Wenbin[^62], the leader of the ‘Million Heroic Army.’ We and Hu Houmin both advocated cooperation with the ‘Million Heroic Army’ to deal with the ruling faction, but most rebels opposed, calling us ‘surrenderists.’
Under Hu Houmin’s call, in March 1976, rebels began to push the provincial party committee to turn. Hu Houmin assigned specific tasks: Cao Chengyi as frontline commander, Lin Zizhong as现场指挥, Yan Chang as secretary. Besides the main responsibility and staff, there were divisions for materials, propaganda, logistics, security, propaganda vehicles, briefings, engraving, slogans, water tower printing groups. Because most staff were from the new faction, Lin Zizhong joked that the counterattack against the rightist reversal was led by “new recruits with steel heads.” Under Hu Houmin’s leadership, the main actions of the rebels in Hubei in 1976 included:
-
Collect signatures from Central Committee members in Wuhan and some provincial and municipal revolutionary committee standing members to publish an open letter to the entire province, issuing critical articles and slogans, calling on the people to respond to Mao’s criticism of Deng and oppose the rightist reversal, closely linking with Hubei and Wuhan’s realities, and guiding cadres to “turn”. Most slogans were drafted by Hu Houmin’s staff team to unify thoughts and clarify main targets. Lin Zizhong and Cao Chengyi recalled: Hu Houmin attached great importance to slogans at each stage, likening it to leading troops—training daily, focusing on ideological education, preventing soldiers from idling, as without slogans, morale would drop and people would be at a loss.
-
On May 2, 1976, Zheng Jun recorded slogans and struggle strategies proposed by the staff team: “Inner tight, outer loose, promote from below, attack from above,深入基层，发动群众。” The four unchanged principles: “目标不变，湖北路线搞正，组织上要体现出来；决心不变；基调不变，也可以说是原则不变，去年七、八、九（月），是林（彪）、刘（丰）路线的继续；突破口不变，（省委第一书记、省革委会主任赵辛初1975年的）‘六四’报告（是执行邓小平的‘三项指示为纲’）。活动上灵活机动，重点在基层以革委会、（革命）领导小组为我们的活动手段。五月份争取有1/3的单位搞起来。抓点：武重、武钢、一冶、交通局、体委。” The “roll back” strategy involved: (1) urging from above, attacking from below, (2) tightening internally and loosening externally, (3) focusing on基层, and (4) unifying actions. This slogan was proposed by Gu Jiantang. It wasn’t new or invented by any individual but was based on experiences from Beijing and Shanghai during the 1974 Anti-Lin, Anti-Confucius campaign, communicated by Xia Bangyin to Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin. This phrase became the “tone” for usurpation of party power, along with Yan Chang’s “unchanged goal, resolution, tone, and breakthrough, with adaptable methods.” During the 1982-1983 trial of rebellious leaders, these were used to prosecute each person, and Shen Fuli also spent years in prison because of this. After the meeting, Peng Xun drafted several slogans as banners, and Cao Chengyi led people to plaster them across Wuhan’s three towns. Major slogans included: “Hubei has Zhao Xinchu, who spoke at the expansion meeting, waving Deng’s Shangfang sword, killing on June 4,” “June 4 speech is a poisonous weed, roll out and bring back,” “Two clears and one batch made mistakes in方向路线,” “Show mercy to rebels,” etc.
Wu Yanjin said: "What if we don’t do large-scale mass movements? We just promote the ‘turning’ within the provincial party committee on a small scale. The provincial leaders at that time dared not say they wouldn’t turn, instead they loudly shouted about ‘turning.’ The specifics of how and where to turn were the question. Hu Houmin led mass representatives from the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees twice to the provincial party committee standing committee to push for the committee. Why could we always smoothly enter the standing committee meeting? Because Xia Bangyin and Xie Wangchun, as central committee members in Wuhan, could naturally attend the meetings. When the standing committee met, Xia Bangyin would call Hu Houmin to inform him, and Hu would lead the team there, so it was a sure thing. ‘Breaking into’ the standing committee was also a charge in the sentencing. At that time, there was no real break-in, and few people wanted to break in but couldn’t. We were all representatives of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees with IDs, and both times Xia Bangyin came out to let us in, so we could face the provincial leaders and exchange views on criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. We were very familiar with the provincial leaders and talked calmly. Zhao Xinchu and others approved of this way of talking. They didn’t want society to become chaotic like the large-scale mass movement of 1969. The provincial leaders reached some consensus with us: 1. The provincial committee was actively turning, firmly criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. 2. Correctly treating the proletarian cultural revolution and the rebellious factions, all those “rolled” down should be brought back. 3. The “two clears and one batch” made mistakes of expansion (which we saw as errors in direction and路线, the rightist reversal and denial of the cultural revolution). However, opinions differed on whether rebellious leaders should be admitted into the party, promoted, or supported, and on whether the provincial party committee should follow Deng Xiaoping’s big rightist reversal, with Secretary Han Ningfu showing more opposition.
According to Lin Zizhong, Gu Jiantang, and others’ recollections: In late October 1976, Hu Houmin even twice approached Yu Wenbin[^62], the leader of the ‘Million Heroic Army.’ We and Hu Houmin both advocated cooperation with the ‘Million Heroic Army’ to deal with the ruling faction, but most rebels opposed, calling us ‘surrenderists.’
Under Hu Houmin’s call, in March 1976, rebels began to push the provincial party committee to turn. Hu Houmin assigned specific tasks: Cao Chengyi as frontline commander, Lin Zizhong as现场指挥, Yan Chang as secretary. Besides the main responsibility and staff, there were divisions for materials, propaganda, logistics, security, propaganda vehicles, briefings, engraving, slogans, water tower printing groups. Because most staff were from the new faction, Lin Zizhong joked that the counterattack against the rightist reversal was led by “new recruits with steel heads.” Under Hu Houmin’s leadership, the main actions of the rebels in Hubei in 1976 included:
-
Collect signatures from Central Committee members in Wuhan and some provincial and municipal revolutionary committee standing members to publish an open letter to the entire province, issuing critical articles and slogans, calling on the people to respond to Mao’s criticism of Deng and oppose the rightist reversal, closely linking with Hubei and Wuhan’s realities, and guiding cadres to “turn”. Most slogans were drafted by Hu Houmin’s staff team to unify thoughts and clarify main targets. Lin Zizhong and Cao Chengyi recalled: Hu Houmin attached great importance to slogans at each stage, likening it to leading troops—training daily, focusing on ideological education, preventing soldiers from idling, as without slogans, morale would drop and people would be at a loss.
-
On May 2, 1976, Zheng Jun recorded slogans and struggle strategies proposed by the staff team: “Inner tight, outer loose, promote from below, attack from above,深入基层，发动群众。” The four unchanged principles: “目标不变，湖北路线搞正，组织上要体现出来；决心不变；基调不变，也可以说是原则不变，去年七、八、九（月），是林（彪）、刘（丰）路线的继续；突破口不变，（省委第一书记、省革委会主任赵辛初1975年的）‘六四’报告（是执行邓小平的‘三项指示为纲’）。活动上灵活机动，重点在基层以革委会、（革命）领导小组为我们的活动手段。五月份争取有1/3的单位搞起来。抓点：武重、武钢、一冶、交通局、体委。” The “roll back” strategy involved: (1) urging from above, attacking from below, (2) tightening internally and loosening externally, (3) focusing on基层, and (4) unifying actions. This slogan was proposed by Gu Jiantang. It wasn’t new or invented by any individual but was based on experiences from Beijing and Shanghai during the 1974 Anti-Lin, Anti-Confucius campaign, communicated by Xia Bangyin to Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin. This phrase became the “tone” for usurpation of party power, along with Yan Chang’s “unchanged goal, resolution, tone, and breakthrough, with adaptable methods.” During the 1982-1983 trial of rebellious leaders, these were used to prosecute each person, and Shen Fuli also spent years in prison because of this. After the meeting, Peng Xun drafted several slogans as banners, and Cao Chengyi led people to plaster them across Wuhan’s three towns. Major slogans included: “Hubei has Zhao Xinchu, who spoke at the expansion meeting, waving Deng’s Shangfang sword, killing on June 4,” “June 4 speech is a poisonous weed, roll out and bring back,” “Two clears and one batch made mistakes in方向路线,” “Show mercy to rebels,” etc.
Wu Yanjin said: "What if we don’t do large-scale mass movements? We just promote the ‘turning’ within the provincial party committee on a small scale. The provincial leaders at that time dared not say they wouldn’t turn, instead they loudly shouted about ‘turning.’ The specifics of how and where to turn were the question. Hu Houmin led mass representatives from the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees twice to the provincial party committee standing committee to push for the committee. Why could we always smoothly enter the standing committee meeting? Because Xia Bangyin and Xie Wangchun, as central committee members in Wuhan, could naturally attend the meetings. When the standing committee met, Xia Bangyin would call Hu Houmin to inform him, and Hu would lead the team there, so it was a sure thing. ‘Breaking into’ the standing committee was also a charge in the sentencing. At that time, there was no real break-in, and few people wanted to break in but couldn’t. We were all representatives of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees with IDs, and both times Xia Bangyin came out to let us in, so we could face the provincial leaders and exchange views on criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. We were very familiar with the provincial leaders and talked calmly. Zhao Xinchu and others approved of this way of talking. They didn’t want society to become chaotic like the large-scale mass movement of 1969. The provincial leaders reached some consensus with us: 1. The provincial committee was actively turning, firmly criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. 2. Correctly treating the proletarian cultural revolution and the rebellious factions, all those “rolled” down should be brought back. 3. The “two clears and one batch” made mistakes of expansion (which we saw as errors in direction and路线, the rightist reversal and denial of the cultural revolution). However, opinions differed on whether rebellious leaders should be admitted into the party, promoted, or supported, and on whether the provincial party committee should follow Deng Xiaoping’s big rightist reversal, with Secretary Han Ningfu showing more opposition.
According to Lin Zizhong, Gu Jiantang, and others’ recollections: In late October 1976, Hu Houmin even twice approached Yu Wenbin[^62], the leader of the ‘Million Heroic Army.’ We and Hu Houmin both advocated cooperation with the ‘Million Heroic Army’ to deal with the ruling faction, but most rebels opposed, calling us ‘surrenderists.’
Under Hu Houmin’s call, in March 1976, rebels began to push the provincial party committee to turn. Hu Houmin assigned specific tasks: Cao Chengyi as frontline commander, Lin Zizhong as现场指挥, Yan Chang as secretary. Besides the main responsibility and staff, there were divisions for materials, propaganda, logistics, security, propaganda vehicles, briefings, engraving, slogans, water tower printing groups. Because most staff were from the new faction, Lin Zizhong joked that the counterattack against the rightist reversal was led by “new recruits with steel heads.” Under Hu Houmin’s leadership, the main actions of the rebels in Hubei in 1976 included:
-
Collect signatures from Central Committee members in Wuhan and some provincial and municipal revolutionary committee standing members to publish an open letter to the entire province, issuing critical articles and slogans, calling on the people to respond to Mao’s criticism of Deng and oppose the rightist reversal, closely linking with Hubei and Wuhan’s realities, and guiding cadres to “turn”. Most slogans were drafted by Hu Houmin’s staff team to unify thoughts and clarify main targets. Lin Zizhong and Cao Chengyi recalled: Hu Houmin attached great importance to slogans at each stage, likening it to leading troops—training daily, focusing on ideological education, preventing soldiers from idling, as without slogans, morale would drop and people would be at a loss.
-
On May 2, 1976, Zheng Jun recorded slogans and struggle strategies proposed by the staff team: “Inner tight, outer loose, promote from below, attack from above,深入基层，发动群众。” The four unchanged principles: “目标不变，湖北路线搞正，组织上要体现出来；决心不变；基调不变，也可以说是原则不变，去年七、八、九（月），是林（彪）、刘（丰）路线的继续；突破口不变，（省委第一书记、省革委会主任赵辛初1975年的）‘六四’报告（是执行邓小平的‘三项指示为纲’）。活动上灵活机动，重点在基层以革委会、（革命）领导小组为我们的活动手段。五月份争取有1/3的单位搞起来。抓点：武重、武钢、一冶、交通局、体委。” The “roll back” strategy involved: (1) urging from above, attacking from below, (2) tightening internally and loosening externally, (3) focusing on基层, and (4) unifying actions. This slogan was proposed by Gu Jiantang. It wasn’t new or invented by any individual but was based on experiences from Beijing and Shanghai during the 1974 Anti-Lin, Anti-Confucius campaign, communicated by Xia Bangyin to Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin. This phrase became the “tone” for usurpation of party power, along with Yan Chang’s “unchanged goal, resolution, tone, and breakthrough, with adaptable methods.” During the 1982-1983 trial of rebellious leaders, these were used to prosecute each person, and Shen Fuli also spent years in prison because of this. After the meeting, Peng Xun drafted several slogans as banners, and Cao Chengyi led people to plaster them across Wuhan’s three towns. Major slogans included: “Hubei has Zhao Xinchu, who spoke at the expansion meeting, waving Deng’s Shangfang sword, killing on June 4,” “June 4 speech is a poisonous weed, roll out and bring back,” “Two clears and one batch made mistakes in方向路线,” “Show mercy to rebels,” etc.
Wu Yanjin said: "What if we don’t do large-scale mass movements? We just promote the ‘turning’ within the provincial party committee on a small scale. The provincial leaders at that time dared not say they wouldn’t turn, instead they loudly shouted about ‘turning.’ The specifics of how and where to turn were the question. Hu Houmin led mass representatives from the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees twice to the provincial party committee standing committee to push for the committee. Why could we always smoothly enter the standing committee meeting? Because Xia Bangyin and Xie Wangchun, as central committee members in Wuhan, could naturally attend the meetings. When the standing committee met, Xia Bangyin would call Hu Houmin to inform him, and Hu would lead the team there, so it was a sure thing. ‘Breaking into’ the standing committee was also a charge in the sentencing. At that time, there was no real break-in, and few people wanted to break in but couldn’t. We were all representatives of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees with IDs, and both times Xia Bangyin came out to let us in, so we could face the provincial leaders and exchange views on criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. We were very familiar with the provincial leaders and talked calmly. Zhao Xinchu and others approved of this way of talking. They didn’t want society to become chaotic like the large-scale mass movement of 1969. The provincial leaders reached some consensus with us: 1. The provincial committee was actively turning, firmly criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. 2. Correctly treating the proletarian cultural revolution and the rebellious factions, all those “rolled” down should be brought back. 3. The “two clears and one batch” made mistakes of expansion (which we saw as errors in direction and路线, the rightist reversal and denial of the cultural revolution). However, opinions differed on whether rebellious leaders should be admitted into the party, promoted, or supported, and on whether the provincial party committee should follow Deng Xiaoping’s big rightist reversal, with Secretary Han Ningfu showing more opposition.
According to Lin Zizhong, Gu Jiantang, and others’ recollections: In late October 1976, Hu Houmin even twice approached Yu Wenbin[^62], the leader of the ‘Million Heroic Army.’ We and Hu Houmin both advocated cooperation with the ‘Million Heroic Army’ to deal with the ruling faction, but most rebels opposed, calling us ‘surrenderists.’
Under Hu Houmin’s call, in March 1976, rebels began to push the provincial party committee to turn. Hu Houmin assigned specific tasks: Cao Chengyi as frontline commander, Lin Zizhong as现场指挥, Yan Chang as secretary. Besides the main responsibility and staff, there were divisions for materials, propaganda, logistics, security, propaganda vehicles, briefings, engraving, slogans, water tower printing groups. Because most staff were from the new faction, Lin Zizhong joked that the counterattack against the rightist reversal was led by “new recruits with steel heads.” Under Hu Houmin’s leadership, the main actions of the rebels in Hubei in 1976 included:
-
Collect signatures from Central Committee members in Wuhan and some provincial and municipal revolutionary committee standing members to publish an open letter to the entire province, issuing critical articles and slogans, calling on the people to respond to Mao’s criticism of Deng and oppose the rightist reversal, closely linking with Hubei and Wuhan’s realities, and guiding cadres to “turn”. Most slogans were drafted by Hu Houmin’s staff team to unify thoughts and clarify main targets. Lin Zizhong and Cao Chengyi recalled: Hu Houmin attached great importance to slogans at each stage, likening it to leading troops—training daily, focusing on ideological education, preventing soldiers from idling, as without slogans, morale would drop and people would be at a loss.
-
On May 2, 1976, Zheng Jun recorded slogans and struggle strategies proposed by the staff team: “Inner tight, outer loose, promote from below, attack from above,深入基层，发动群众。” The four unchanged principles: “目标不变，湖北路线搞正，组织上要体现出来；决心不变；基调不变，也可以说是原则不变，去年七、八、九（月），是林（彪）、刘（丰）路线的继续；突破口不变，（省委第一书记、省革委会主任赵辛初1975年的）‘六四’报告（是执行邓小平的‘三项指示为纲’）。活动上灵活机动，重点在基层以革委会、（革命）领导小组为我们的活动手段。五月份争取有1/3的单位搞起来。抓点：武重、武钢、一冶、交通局、体委。” The “roll back” strategy involved: (1) urging from above, attacking from below, (2) tightening internally and loosening externally, (3) focusing on基层, and (4) unifying actions. This slogan was proposed by Gu Jiantang. It wasn’t new or invented by any individual but was based on experiences from Beijing and Shanghai during the 1974 Anti-Lin, Anti-Confucius campaign, communicated by Xia Bangyin to Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin. This phrase became the “tone” for usurpation of party power, along with Yan Chang’s “unchanged goal, resolution, tone, and breakthrough, with adaptable methods.” During the 1982-1983 trial of rebellious leaders, these were used to prosecute each person, and Shen Fuli also spent years in prison because of this. After the meeting, Peng Xun drafted several slogans as banners, and Cao Chengyi led people to plaster them across Wuhan’s three towns. Major slogans included: “Hubei has Zhao Xinchu, who spoke at the expansion meeting, waving Deng’s Shangfang sword, killing on June 4,” “June 4 speech is a poisonous weed, roll out and bring back,” “Two clears and one batch made mistakes in方向路线,” “Show mercy to rebels,” etc.
Wu Yanjin said: "What if we don’t do large-scale mass movements? We just promote the ‘turning’ within the provincial party committee on a small scale. The provincial leaders at that time dared not say they wouldn’t turn, instead they loudly shouted about ‘turning.’ The specifics of how and where to turn were the question. Hu Houmin led mass representatives from the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees twice to the provincial party committee standing committee to push for the committee. Why could we always smoothly enter the standing committee meeting? Because Xia Bangyin and Xie Wangchun, as central committee members in Wuhan, could naturally attend the meetings. When the standing committee met, Xia Bangyin would call Hu Houmin to inform him, and Hu would lead the team there, so it was a sure thing. ‘Breaking into’ the standing committee was also a charge in the sentencing. At that time, there was no real break-in, and few people wanted to break in but couldn’t. We were all representatives of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees with IDs, and both times Xia Bangyin came out to let us in, so we could face the provincial leaders and exchange views on criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. We were very familiar with the provincial leaders and talked calmly. Zhao Xinchu and others approved of this way of talking. They didn’t want society to become chaotic like the large-scale mass movement of 1969. The provincial leaders reached some consensus with us: 1. The provincial committee was actively turning, firmly criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. 2. Correctly treating the proletarian cultural revolution and the rebellious factions, all those “rolled” down should be brought back. 3. The “two clears and one batch” made mistakes of expansion (which we saw as errors in direction and路线, the rightist reversal and denial of the cultural revolution). However, opinions differed on whether rebellious leaders should be admitted into the party, promoted, or supported, and on whether the provincial party committee should follow Deng Xiaoping’s big rightist reversal, with Secretary Han Ningfu showing more opposition.
According to Lin Zizhong, Gu Jiantang, and others’ recollections: In late October 1976, Hu Houmin even twice approached Yu Wenbin[^62], the leader of the ‘Million Heroic Army.’ We and Hu Houmin both advocated cooperation with the ‘Million Heroic Army’ to deal with the ruling faction, but most rebels opposed, calling us ‘surrenderists.’
Under Hu Houmin’s call, in March 1976, rebels began to push the provincial party committee to turn. Hu Houmin assigned specific tasks: Cao Chengyi as frontline commander, Lin Zizhong as现场指挥, Yan Chang as secretary. Besides the main responsibility and staff, there were divisions for materials, propaganda, logistics, security, propaganda vehicles, briefings, engraving, slogans, water tower printing groups. Because most staff were from the new faction, Lin Zizhong joked that the counterattack against the rightist reversal was led by “new recruits with steel heads.” Under Hu Houmin’s leadership, the main actions of the rebels in Hubei in 1976 included:
-
Collect signatures from Central Committee members in Wuhan and some provincial and municipal revolutionary committee standing members to publish an open letter to the entire province, issuing critical articles and slogans, calling on the people to respond to Mao’s criticism of Deng and oppose the rightist reversal, closely linking with Hubei and Wuhan’s realities, and guiding cadres to “turn”. Most slogans were drafted by Hu Houmin’s staff team to unify thoughts and clarify main targets. Lin Zizhong and Cao Chengyi recalled: Hu Houmin attached great importance to slogans at each stage, likening it to leading troops—training daily, focusing on ideological education, preventing soldiers from idling, as without slogans, morale would drop and people would be at a loss.
-
On May 2, 1976, Zheng Jun recorded slogans and struggle strategies proposed by the staff team: “Inner tight, outer loose, promote from below, attack from above,深入基层，发动群众。” The four unchanged principles: “目标不变，湖北路线搞正，组织上要体现出来；决心不变；基调不变，也可以说是原则不变，去年七、八、九（月），是林（彪）、刘（丰）路线的继续；突破口不变，（省委第一书记、省革委会主任赵辛初1975年的）‘六四’报告（是执行邓小平的‘三项指示为纲’）。活动上灵活机动，重点在基层以革委会、（革命）领导小组为我们的活动手段。五月份争取有1/3的单位搞起来。抓点：武重、武钢、一冶、交通局、体委。” The “roll back” strategy involved: (1) urging from above, attacking from below, (2) tightening internally and loosening externally, (3) focusing on基层, and (4) unifying actions. This slogan was proposed by Gu Jiantang. It wasn’t new or invented by any individual but was based on experiences from Beijing and Shanghai during the 1974 Anti-Lin, Anti-Confucius campaign, communicated by Xia Bangyin to Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin. This phrase became the “tone” for usurpation of party power, along with Yan Chang’s “unchanged goal, resolution, tone, and breakthrough, with adaptable methods.” During the 1982-1983 trial of rebellious leaders, these were used to prosecute each person, and Shen Fuli also spent years in prison because of this. After the meeting, Peng Xun drafted several slogans as banners, and Cao Chengyi led people to plaster them across Wuhan’s three towns. Major slogans included: “Hubei has Zhao Xinchu, who spoke at the expansion meeting, waving Deng’s Shangfang sword, killing on June 4,” “June 4 speech is a poisonous weed, roll out and bring back,” “Two clears and one batch made mistakes in方向路线,” “Show mercy to rebels,” etc.
Wu Yanjin said: "What if we don’t do large-scale mass movements? We just promote the ‘turning’ within the provincial party committee on a small scale. The provincial leaders at that time dared not say they wouldn’t turn, instead they loudly shouted about ‘turning.’ The specifics of how and where to turn were the question. Hu Houmin led mass representatives from the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees twice to the provincial party committee standing committee to push for the committee. Why could we always smoothly enter the standing committee meeting? Because Xia Bangyin and Xie Wangchun, as central committee members in Wuhan, could naturally attend the meetings. When the standing committee met, Xia Bangyin would call Hu Houmin to inform him, and Hu would lead the team there, so it was a sure thing. ‘Breaking into’ the standing committee was also a charge in the sentencing. At that time, there was no real break-in, and few people wanted to break in but couldn’t. We were all representatives of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees with IDs, and both times Xia Bangyin came out to let us in, so we could face the provincial leaders and exchange views on criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. We were very familiar with the provincial leaders and talked calmly. Zhao Xinchu and others approved of this way of talking. They didn’t want society to become chaotic like the large-scale mass movement of 1969. The provincial leaders reached some consensus with us: 1. The provincial committee was actively turning, firmly criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. 2. Correctly treating the proletarian cultural revolution and the rebellious factions, all those “rolled” down should be brought back. 3. The “two clears and one batch” made mistakes of expansion (which we saw as errors in direction and路线, the rightist reversal and denial of the cultural revolution). However, opinions differed on whether rebellious leaders should be admitted into the party, promoted, or supported, and on whether the provincial party committee should follow Deng Xiaoping’s big rightist reversal, with Secretary Han Ningfu showing more opposition.
According to Lin Zizhong, Gu Jiantang, and others’ recollections: In late October 1976, Hu Houmin even twice approached Yu Wenbin[^62], the leader of the ‘Million Heroic Army.’ We and Hu Houmin both advocated cooperation with the ‘Million Heroic Army’ to deal with the ruling faction, but most rebels opposed, calling us ‘surrenderists.’
Under Hu Houmin’s call, in March 1976, rebels began to push the provincial party committee to turn. Hu Houmin assigned specific tasks: Cao Chengyi as frontline commander, Lin Zizhong as现场指挥, Yan Chang as secretary. Besides the main responsibility and staff, there were divisions for materials, propaganda, logistics, security, propaganda vehicles, briefings, engraving, slogans, water tower printing groups. Because most staff were from the new faction, Lin Zizhong joked that the counterattack against the rightist reversal was led by “new recruits with steel heads.” Under Hu Houmin’s leadership, the main actions of the rebels in Hubei in 1976 included:
-
Collect signatures from Central Committee members in Wuhan and some provincial and municipal revolutionary committee standing members to publish an open letter to the entire province, issuing critical articles and slogans, calling on the people to respond to Mao’s criticism of Deng and oppose the rightist reversal, closely linking with Hubei and Wuhan’s realities, and guiding cadres to “turn”. Most slogans were drafted by Hu Houmin’s staff team to unify thoughts and clarify main targets. Lin Zizhong and Cao Chengyi recalled: Hu Houmin attached great importance to slogans at each stage, likening it to leading troops—training daily, focusing on ideological education, preventing soldiers from idling, as without slogans, morale would drop and people would be at a loss.
-
On May 2, 1976, Zheng Jun recorded slogans and struggle strategies proposed by the staff team: “Inner tight, outer loose, promote from below, attack from above,深入基层，发动群众。” The four unchanged principles: “目标不变，湖北路线搞正，组织上要体现出来；决心不变；基调不变，也可以说是原则不变，去年七、八、九（月），是林（彪）、刘（丰）路线的继续；突破口不变，（省委第一书记、省革委会主任赵辛初1975年的）‘六四’报告（是执行邓小平的‘三项指示为纲’）。活动上灵活机动，重点在基层以革委会、（革命）领导小组为我们的活动手段。五月份争取有1/3的单位搞起来。抓点：武重、武钢、一冶、交通局、体委。” The “roll back” strategy involved: (1) urging from above, attacking from below, (2) tightening internally and loosening externally, (3) focusing on基层, and (4) unifying actions. This slogan was proposed by Gu Jiantang. It wasn’t new or invented by any individual but was based on experiences from Beijing and Shanghai during the 1974 Anti-Lin, Anti-Confucius campaign, communicated by Xia Bangyin to Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin. This phrase became the “tone” for usurpation of party power, along with Yan Chang’s “unchanged goal, resolution, tone, and breakthrough, with adaptable methods.” During the 1982-1983 trial of rebellious leaders, these were used to prosecute each person, and Shen Fuli also spent years in prison because of this. After the meeting, Peng Xun drafted several slogans as banners, and Cao Chengyi led people to plaster them across Wuhan’s three towns. Major slogans included: “Hubei has Zhao Xinchu, who spoke at the expansion meeting, waving Deng’s Shangfang sword, killing on June 4,” “June 4 speech is a poisonous weed, roll out and bring back,” “Two clears and one batch made mistakes in方向路线,” “Show mercy to rebels,” etc.
Wu Yanjin said: "What if we don’t do large-scale mass movements? We just promote the ‘turning’ within the provincial party committee on a small scale. The provincial leaders at that time dared not say they wouldn’t turn, instead they loudly shouted about ‘turning.’ The specifics of how and where to turn were the question. Hu Houmin led mass representatives from the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees twice to the provincial party committee standing committee to push for the committee. Why could we always smoothly enter the standing committee meeting? Because Xia Bangyin and Xie Wangchun, as central committee members in Wuhan, could naturally attend the meetings. When the standing committee met, Xia Bangyin would call Hu Houmin to inform him, and Hu would lead the team there, so it was a sure thing. ‘Breaking into’ the standing committee was also a charge in the sentencing. At that time, there was no real break-in, and few people wanted to break in but couldn’t. We were all representatives of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees with IDs, and both times Xia Bangyin came out to let us in, so we could face the provincial leaders and exchange views on criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. We were very familiar with the provincial leaders and talked calmly. Zhao Xinchu and others approved of this way of talking. They didn’t want society to become chaotic like the large-scale mass movement of 1969. The provincial leaders reached some consensus with us: 1. The provincial committee was actively turning, firmly criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. 2. Correctly treating the proletarian cultural revolution and the rebellious factions, all those “rolled” down should be brought back. 3. The “two clears and one batch” made mistakes of expansion (which we saw as errors in direction and路线, the rightist reversal and denial of the cultural revolution). However, opinions differed on whether rebellious leaders should be admitted into the party, promoted, or supported, and on whether the provincial party committee should follow Deng Xiaoping’s big rightist reversal, with Secretary Han Ningfu showing more opposition.
According to Lin Zizhong, Gu Jiantang, and others’ recollections: In late October 1976, Hu Houmin even twice approached Yu Wenbin[^62], the leader of the ‘Million Heroic Army.’ We and Hu Houmin both advocated cooperation with the ‘Million Heroic Army’ to deal with the ruling faction, but most rebels opposed, calling us ‘surrenderists.’
Under Hu Houmin’s call, in March 1976, rebels began to push the provincial party committee to turn. Hu Houmin assigned specific tasks: Cao Chengyi as frontline commander, Lin Zizhong as现场指挥, Yan Chang as secretary. Besides the main responsibility and staff, there were divisions for materials, propaganda, logistics, security, propaganda vehicles, briefings, engraving, slogans, water tower printing groups. Because most staff were from the new faction, Lin Zizhong joked that the counterattack against the rightist reversal was led by “new recruits with steel heads.” Under Hu Houmin’s leadership, the main actions of the rebels in Hubei in 1976 included:
-
Collect signatures from Central Committee members in Wuhan and some provincial and municipal revolutionary committee standing members to publish an open letter to the entire province, issuing critical articles and slogans, calling on the people to respond to Mao’s criticism of Deng and oppose the rightist reversal, closely linking with Hubei and Wuhan’s realities, and guiding cadres to “turn”. Most slogans were drafted by Hu Houmin’s staff team to unify thoughts and clarify main targets. Lin Zizhong and Cao Chengyi recalled: Hu Houmin attached great importance to slogans at each stage, likening it to leading troops—training daily, focusing on ideological education, preventing soldiers from idling, as without slogans, morale would drop and people would be at a loss.
-
On May 2, 1976, Zheng Jun recorded slogans and struggle strategies proposed by the staff team: “Inner tight, outer loose, promote from below, attack from above,深入基层，发动群众。” The four unchanged principles: “目标不变，湖北路线搞正，组织上要体现出来；决心不变；基调不变，也可以说是原则不变，去年七、八、九（月），是林（彪）、刘（丰）路线的继续；突破口不变，（省委第一书记、省革委会主任赵辛初1975年的）‘六四’报告（是执行邓小平的‘三项指示为纲’）。活动上灵活机动，重点在基层以革委会、（革命）领导小组为我们的活动手段。五月份争取有1/3的单位搞起来。抓点：武重、武钢、一冶、交通局、体委。” The “roll back” strategy involved: (1) urging from above, attacking from below, (2) tightening internally and loosening externally, (3) focusing on基层, and (4) unifying actions. This slogan was proposed by Gu Jiantang. It wasn’t new or invented by any individual but was based on experiences from Beijing and Shanghai during the 1974 Anti-Lin, Anti-Confucius campaign, communicated by Xia Bangyin to Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin. This phrase became the “tone” for usurpation of party power, along with Yan Chang’s “unchanged goal, resolution, tone, and breakthrough, with adaptable methods.” During the 1982-1983 trial of rebellious leaders, these were used to prosecute each person, and Shen Fuli also spent years in prison because of this. After the meeting, Peng Xun drafted several slogans as banners, and Cao Chengyi led people to plaster them across Wuhan’s three towns. Major slogans included: “Hubei has Zhao Xinchu, who spoke at the expansion meeting, waving Deng’s Shangfang sword, killing on June 4,” “June 4 speech is a poisonous weed, roll out and bring back,” “Two clears and one batch made mistakes in方向路线,” “Show mercy to rebels,” etc.
Wu Yanjin said: "What if we don’t do large-scale mass movements? We just promote the ‘turning’ within the provincial party committee on a small scale. The provincial leaders at that time dared not say they wouldn’t turn, instead they loudly shouted about ‘turning.’ The specifics of how and where to turn were the question. Hu Houmin led mass representatives from the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees twice to the provincial party committee standing committee to push for the committee. Why could we always smoothly enter the standing committee meeting? Because Xia Bangyin and Xie Wangchun, as central committee members in Wuhan, could naturally attend the meetings. When the standing committee met, Xia Bangyin would call Hu Houmin to inform him, and Hu would lead the team there, so it was a sure thing. ‘Breaking into’ the standing committee was also a charge in the sentencing. At that time, there was no real break-in, and few people wanted to break in but couldn’t. We were all representatives of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees with IDs, and both times Xia Bangyin came out to let us in, so we could face the provincial leaders and exchange views on criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. We were very familiar with the provincial leaders and talked calmly. Zhao Xinchu and others approved of this way of talking. They didn’t want society to become chaotic like the large-scale mass movement of 1969. The provincial leaders reached some consensus with us: 1. The provincial committee was actively turning, firmly criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. 2. Correctly treating the proletarian cultural revolution and the rebellious factions, all those “rolled” down should be brought back. 3. The “two clears and one batch” made mistakes of expansion (which we saw as errors in direction and路线, the rightist reversal and denial of the cultural revolution). However, opinions differed on whether rebellious leaders should be admitted into the party, promoted, or supported, and on whether the provincial party committee should follow Deng Xiaoping’s big rightist reversal, with Secretary Han Ningfu showing more opposition.
According to Lin Zizhong, Gu Jiantang, and others’ recollections: In late October 1976, Hu Houmin even twice approached Yu Wenbin[^62], the leader of the ‘Million Heroic Army.’ We and Hu Houmin both advocated cooperation with the ‘Million Heroic Army’ to deal with the ruling faction, but most rebels opposed, calling us ‘surrenderists.’
Under Hu Houmin’s call, in March 1976, rebels began to push the provincial party committee to turn. Hu Houmin assigned specific tasks: Cao Chengyi as frontline commander, Lin Zizhong as现场指挥, Yan Chang as secretary. Besides the main responsibility and staff, there were divisions for materials, propaganda, logistics, security, propaganda vehicles, briefings, engraving, slogans, water tower printing groups. Because most staff were from the new faction, Lin Zizhong joked that the counterattack against the rightist reversal was led by “new recruits with steel heads.” Under Hu Houmin’s leadership, the main actions of the rebels in Hubei in 1976 included:
-
Collect signatures from Central Committee members in Wuhan and some provincial and municipal revolutionary committee standing members to publish an open letter to the entire province, issuing critical articles and slogans, calling on the people to respond to Mao’s criticism of Deng and oppose the rightist reversal, closely linking with Hubei and Wuhan’s realities, and guiding cadres to “turn”. Most slogans were drafted by Hu Houmin’s staff team to unify thoughts and clarify main targets. Lin Zizhong and Cao Chengyi recalled: Hu Houmin attached great importance to slogans at each stage, likening it to leading troops—training daily, focusing on ideological education, preventing soldiers from idling, as without slogans, morale would drop and people would be at a loss.
-
On May 2, 1976, Zheng Jun recorded slogans and struggle strategies proposed by the staff team: “Inner tight, outer loose, promote from below, attack from above,深入基层，发动群众。” The four unchanged principles: “目标不变，湖北路线搞正，组织上要体现出来；决心不变；基调不变，也可以说是原则不变，去年七、八、九（月），是林（彪）、刘（丰）路线的继续；突破口不变，（省委第一书记、省革委会主任赵辛初1975年的）‘六四’报告（是执行邓小平的‘三项指示为纲’）。活动上灵活机动，重点在基层以革委会、（革命）领导小组为我们的活动手段。五月份争取有1/3的单位搞起来。抓点：武重、武钢、一冶、交通局、体委。” The “roll back” strategy involved: (1) urging from above, attacking from below, (2) tightening internally and loosening externally, (3) focusing on基层, and (4) unifying actions. This slogan was proposed by Gu Jiantang. It wasn’t new or invented by any individual but was based on experiences from Beijing and Shanghai during the 1974 Anti-Lin, Anti-Confucius campaign, communicated by Xia Bangyin to Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin. This phrase became the “tone” for usurpation of party power, along with Yan Chang’s “unchanged goal, resolution, tone, and breakthrough, with adaptable methods.” During the 1982-1983 trial of rebellious leaders, these were used to prosecute each person, and Shen Fuli also spent years in prison because of this. After the meeting, Peng Xun drafted several slogans as banners, and Cao Chengyi led people to plaster them across Wuhan’s three towns. Major slogans included: “Hubei has Zhao Xinchu, who spoke at the expansion meeting, waving Deng’s Shangfang sword, killing on June 4,” “June 4 speech is a poisonous weed, roll out and bring back,” “Two clears and one batch made mistakes in方向路线,” “Show mercy to rebels,” etc.
Wu Yanjin said: "What if we don’t do large-scale mass movements? We just promote the ‘turning’ within the provincial party committee on a small scale. The provincial leaders at that time dared not say they wouldn’t turn, instead they loudly shouted about ‘turning.’ The specifics of how and where to turn were the question. Hu Houmin led mass representatives from the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees twice to the provincial party committee standing committee to push for the committee. Why could we always smoothly enter the standing committee meeting? Because Xia Bangyin and Xie Wangchun, as central committee members in Wuhan, could naturally attend the meetings. When the standing committee met, Xia Bangyin would call Hu Houmin to inform him, and Hu would lead the team there, so it was a sure thing. ‘Breaking into’ the standing committee was also a charge in the sentencing. At that time, there was no real break-in, and few people wanted to break in but couldn’t. We were all representatives of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees with IDs, and both times Xia Bangyin came out to let us in, so we could face the provincial leaders and exchange views on criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. We were very familiar with the provincial leaders and talked calmly. Zhao Xinchu and others approved of this way of talking. They didn’t want society to become chaotic like the large-scale mass movement of 1969. The provincial leaders reached some consensus with us: 1. The provincial committee was actively turning, firmly criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. 2. Correctly treating the proletarian cultural revolution and the rebellious factions, all those “rolled” down should be brought back. 3. The “two clears and one batch” made mistakes of expansion (which we saw as errors in direction and路线, the rightist reversal and denial of the cultural revolution). However, opinions differed on whether rebellious leaders should be admitted into the party, promoted, or supported, and on whether the provincial party committee should follow Deng Xiaoping’s big rightist reversal, with Secretary Han Ningfu showing more opposition.
According to Lin Zizhong, Gu Jiantang, and others’ recollections: In late October 1976, Hu Houmin even twice approached Yu Wenbin[^62], the leader of the ‘Million Heroic Army.’ We and Hu Houmin both advocated cooperation with the ‘Million Heroic Army’ to deal with the ruling faction, but most rebels opposed, calling us ‘surrenderists.’
Under Hu Houmin’s call, in March 1976, rebels began to push the provincial party committee to turn. Hu Houmin assigned specific tasks: Cao Chengyi as frontline commander, Lin Zizhong as现场指挥, Yan Chang as secretary. Besides the main responsibility and staff, there were divisions for materials, propaganda, logistics, security, propaganda vehicles, briefings, engraving, slogans, water tower printing groups. Because most staff were from the new faction, Lin Zizhong joked that the counterattack against the rightist reversal was led by “new recruits with steel heads.” Under Hu Houmin’s leadership, the main actions of the rebels in Hubei in 1976 included:
-
Collect signatures from Central Committee members in Wuhan and some provincial and municipal revolutionary committee standing members to publish an open letter to the entire province, issuing critical articles and slogans, calling on the people to respond to Mao’s criticism of Deng and oppose the rightist reversal, closely linking with Hubei and Wuhan’s realities, and guiding cadres to “turn”. Most slogans were drafted by Hu Houmin’s staff team to unify thoughts and clarify main targets. Lin Zizhong and Cao Chengyi recalled: Hu Houmin attached great importance to slogans at each stage, likening it to leading troops—training daily, focusing on ideological education, preventing soldiers from idling, as without slogans, morale would drop and people would be at a loss.
-
On May 2, 1976, Zheng Jun recorded slogans and struggle strategies proposed by the staff team: “Inner tight, outer loose, promote from below, attack from above,深入基层，发动群众。” The four unchanged principles: “目标不变，湖北路线搞正，组织上要体现出来；决心不变；基调不变，也可以说是原则不变，去年七、八、九（月），是林（彪）、刘（丰）路线的继续；突破口不变，（省委第一书记、省革委会主任赵辛初1975年的）‘六四’报告（是执行邓小平的‘三项指示为纲’）。活动上灵活机动，重点在基层以革委会、（革命）领导小组为我们的活动手段。五月份争取有1/3的单位搞起来。抓点：武重、武钢、一冶、交通局、体委。” The “roll back” strategy involved: (1) urging from above, attacking from below, (2) tightening internally and loosening externally, (3) focusing on基层, and (4) unifying actions. This slogan was proposed by Gu Jiantang. It wasn’t new or invented by any individual but was based on experiences from Beijing and Shanghai during the 1974 Anti-Lin, Anti-Confucius campaign, communicated by Xia Bangyin to Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin. This phrase became the “tone” for usurpation of party power, along with Yan Chang’s “unchanged goal, resolution, tone, and breakthrough, with adaptable methods.” During the 1982-1983 trial of rebellious leaders, these were used to prosecute each person, and Shen Fuli also spent years in prison because of this. After the meeting, Peng Xun drafted several slogans as banners, and Cao Chengyi led people to plaster them across Wuhan’s three towns. Major slogans included: “Hubei has Zhao Xinchu, who spoke at the expansion meeting, waving Deng’s Shangfang sword, killing on June 4,” “June 4 speech is a poisonous weed, roll out and bring back,” “Two clears and one batch made mistakes in方向路线,” “Show mercy to rebels,” etc.
Wu Yanjin said: "What if we don’t do large-scale mass movements? We just promote the ‘turning’ within the provincial party committee on a small scale. The provincial leaders at that time dared not say they wouldn’t turn, instead they loudly shouted about ‘turning.’ The specifics of how and where to turn were the question. Hu Houmin led mass representatives from the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees twice to the provincial party committee standing committee to push for the committee. Why could we always smoothly enter the standing committee meeting? Because Xia Bangyin and Xie Wangchun, as central committee members in Wuhan, could naturally attend the meetings. When the standing committee met, Xia Bangyin would call Hu Houmin to inform him, and Hu would lead the team there, so it was a sure thing. ‘Breaking into’ the standing committee was also a charge in the sentencing. At that time, there was no real break-in, and few people wanted to break in but couldn’t. We were all representatives of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees with IDs, and both times Xia Bangyin came out to let us in, so we could face the provincial leaders and exchange views on criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. We were very familiar with the provincial leaders and talked calmly. Zhao Xinchu and others approved of this way of talking. They didn’t want society to become chaotic like the large-scale mass movement of 1969. The provincial leaders reached some consensus with us: 1. The provincial committee was actively turning, firmly criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. 2. Correctly treating the proletarian cultural revolution and the rebellious factions, all those “rolled” down should be brought back. 3. The “two clears and one batch” made mistakes of expansion (which we saw as errors in direction and路线, the rightist reversal and denial of the cultural revolution). However, opinions differed on whether rebellious leaders should be admitted into the party, promoted, or supported, and on whether the provincial party committee should follow Deng Xiaoping’s big rightist reversal, with Secretary Han Ningfu showing more opposition.
According to Lin Zizhong, Gu Jiantang, and others’ recollections: In late October 1976, Hu Houmin even twice approached Yu Wenbin[^62], the leader of the ‘Million Heroic Army.’ We and Hu Houmin both advocated cooperation with the ‘Million Heroic Army’ to deal with the ruling faction, but most rebels opposed, calling us ‘surrenderists.’
Under Hu Houmin’s call, in March 1976, rebels began to push the provincial party committee to turn. Hu Houmin assigned specific tasks: Cao Chengyi as frontline commander, Lin Zizhong as现场指挥, Yan Chang as secretary. Besides the main responsibility and staff, there were divisions for materials, propaganda, logistics, security, propaganda vehicles, briefings, engraving, slogans, water tower printing groups. Because most staff were from the new faction, Lin Zizhong joked that the counterattack against the rightist reversal was led by “new recruits with steel heads.” Under Hu Houmin’s leadership, the main actions of the rebels in Hubei in 1976 included:
-
Collect signatures from Central Committee members in Wuhan and some provincial and municipal revolutionary committee standing members to publish an open letter to the entire province, issuing critical articles and slogans, calling on the people to respond to Mao’s criticism of Deng and oppose the rightist reversal, closely linking with Hubei and Wuhan’s realities, and guiding cadres to “turn”. Most slogans were drafted by Hu Houmin’s staff team to unify thoughts and clarify main targets. Lin Zizhong and Cao Chengyi recalled: Hu Houmin attached great importance to slogans at each stage, likening it to leading troops—training daily, focusing on ideological education, preventing soldiers from idling, as without slogans, morale would drop and people would be at a loss.
-
On May 2, 1976, Zheng Jun recorded slogans and struggle strategies proposed by the staff team: “Inner tight, outer loose, promote from below, attack from above,深入基层，发动群众。” The four unchanged principles: “目标不变，湖北路线搞正，组织上要体现出来；决心不变；基调不变，也可以说是原则不变，去年七、八、九（月），是林（彪）、刘（丰）路线的继续；突破口不变，（省委第一书记、省革委会主任赵辛初1975年的）‘六四’报告（是执行邓小平的‘三项指示为纲’）。活动上灵活机动，重点在基层以革委会、（革命）领导小组为我们的活动手段。五月份争取有1/3的单位搞起来。抓点：武重、武钢、一冶、交通局、体委。” The “roll back” strategy involved: (1) urging from above, attacking from below, (2) tightening internally and loosening externally, (3) focusing on基层, and (4) unifying actions. This slogan was proposed by Gu Jiantang. It wasn’t new or invented by any individual but was based on experiences from Beijing and Shanghai during the 1974 Anti-Lin, Anti-Confucius campaign, communicated by Xia Bangyin to Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin. This phrase became the “tone” for usurpation of party power, along with Yan Chang’s “unchanged goal, resolution, tone, and breakthrough, with adaptable methods.” During the 1982-1983 trial of rebellious leaders, these were used to prosecute each person, and Shen Fuli also spent years in prison because of this. After the meeting, Peng Xun drafted several slogans as banners, and Cao Chengyi led people to plaster them across Wuhan’s three towns. Major slogans included: “Hubei has Zhao Xinchu, who spoke at the expansion meeting, waving Deng’s Shangfang sword, killing on June 4,” “June 4 speech is a poisonous weed, roll out and bring back,” “Two clears and one batch made mistakes in方向路线,” “Show mercy to rebels,” etc.
Wu Yanjin said: "What if we don’t do large-scale mass movements? We just promote the ‘turning’ within the provincial party committee on a small scale. The provincial leaders at that time dared not say they wouldn’t turn, instead they loudly shouted about ‘turning.’ The specifics of how and where to turn were the question. Hu Houmin led mass representatives from the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees twice to the provincial party committee standing committee to push for the committee. Why could we always smoothly enter the standing committee meeting? Because Xia Bangyin and Xie Wangchun, as central committee members in Wuhan, could naturally attend the meetings. When the standing committee met, Xia Bangyin would call Hu Houmin to inform him, and Hu would lead the team there, so it was a sure thing. ‘Breaking into’ the standing committee was also a charge in the sentencing. At that time, there was no real break-in, and few people wanted to break in but couldn’t. We were all representatives of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees with IDs, and both times Xia Bangyin came out to let us in, so we could face the provincial leaders and exchange views on criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. We were very familiar with the provincial leaders and talked calmly. Zhao Xinchu and others approved of this way of talking. They didn’t want society to become chaotic like the large-scale mass movement of 1969. The provincial leaders reached some consensus with us: 1. The provincial committee was actively turning, firmly criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. 2. Correctly treating the proletarian cultural revolution and the rebellious factions, all those “rolled” down should be brought back. 3. The “two clears and one batch” made mistakes of expansion (which we saw as errors in direction and路线, the rightist reversal and denial of the cultural revolution). However, opinions differed on whether rebellious leaders should be admitted into the party, promoted, or supported, and on whether the provincial party committee should follow Deng Xiaoping’s big rightist reversal, with Secretary Han Ningfu showing more opposition.
According to Lin Zizhong, Gu Jiantang, and others’ recollections: In late October 1976, Hu Houmin even twice approached Yu Wenbin[^62], the leader of the ‘Million Heroic Army.’ We and Hu Houmin both advocated cooperation with the ‘Million Heroic Army’ to deal with the ruling faction, but most rebels opposed, calling us ‘surrenderists.’
Under Hu Houmin’s call, in March 1976, rebels began to push the provincial party committee to turn. Hu Houmin assigned specific tasks: Cao Chengyi as frontline commander, Lin Zizhong as现场指挥, Yan Chang as secretary. Besides the main responsibility and staff, there were divisions for materials, propaganda, logistics, security, propaganda vehicles, briefings, engraving, slogans, water tower printing groups. Because most staff were from the new faction, Lin Zizhong joked that the counterattack against the rightist reversal was led by “new recruits with steel heads.” Under Hu Houmin’s leadership, the main actions of the rebels in Hubei in 1976 included:
-
Collect signatures from Central Committee members in Wuhan and some provincial and municipal revolutionary committee standing members to publish an open letter to the entire province, issuing critical articles and slogans, calling on the people to respond to Mao’s criticism of Deng and oppose the rightist reversal, closely linking with Hubei and Wuhan’s realities, and guiding cadres to “turn”. Most slogans were drafted by Hu Houmin’s staff team to unify thoughts and clarify main targets. Lin Zizhong and Cao Chengyi recalled: Hu Houmin attached great importance to slogans at each stage, likening it to leading troops—training daily, focusing on ideological education, preventing soldiers from idling, as without slogans, morale would drop and people would be at a loss.
-
On May 2, 1976, Zheng Jun recorded slogans and struggle strategies proposed by the staff team: “Inner tight, outer loose, promote from below, attack from above,深入基层，发动群众。” The four unchanged principles: “目标不变，湖北路线搞正，组织上要体现出来；决心不变；基调不变，也可以说是原则不变，去年七、八、九（月），是林（彪）、刘（丰）路线的继续；突破口不变，（省委第一书记、省革委会主任赵辛初1975年的）‘六四’报告（是执行邓小平的‘三项指示为纲’）。活动上灵活机动，重点在基层以革委会、（革命）领导小组为我们的活动手段。五月份争取有1/3的单位搞起来。抓点：武重、武钢、一冶、交通局、体委。” The “roll back” strategy involved: (1) urging from above, attacking from below, (2) tightening internally and loosening externally, (3) focusing on基层, and (4) unifying actions. This slogan was proposed by Gu Jiantang. It wasn’t new or invented by any individual but was based on experiences from Beijing and Shanghai during the 1974 Anti-Lin, Anti-Confucius campaign, communicated by Xia Bangyin to Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin. This phrase became the “tone” for usurpation of party power, along with Yan Chang’s “unchanged goal, resolution, tone, and breakthrough, with adaptable methods.” During the 1982-1983 trial of rebellious leaders, these were used to prosecute each person, and Shen Fuli also spent years in prison because of this. After the meeting, Peng Xun drafted several slogans as banners, and Cao Chengyi led people to plaster them across Wuhan’s three towns. Major slogans included: “Hubei has Zhao Xinchu, who spoke at the expansion meeting, waving Deng’s Shangfang sword, killing on June 4,” “June 4 speech is a poisonous weed, roll out and bring back,” “Two clears and one batch made mistakes in方向路线,” “Show mercy to rebels,” etc.
Wu Yanjin said: "What if we don’t do large-scale mass movements? We just promote the ‘turning’ within the provincial party committee on a small scale. The provincial leaders at that time dared not say they wouldn’t turn, instead they loudly shouted about ‘turning.’ The specifics of how and where to turn were the question. Hu Houmin led mass representatives from the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees twice to the provincial party committee standing committee to push for the committee. Why could we always smoothly enter the standing committee meeting? Because Xia Bangyin and Xie Wangchun, as central committee members in Wuhan, could naturally attend the meetings. When the standing committee met, Xia Bangyin would call Hu Houmin to inform him, and Hu would lead the team there, so it was a sure thing. ‘Breaking into’ the standing committee was also a charge in the sentencing. At that time, there was no real break-in, and few people wanted to break in but couldn’t. We were all representatives of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees with IDs, and both times Xia Bangyin came out to let us in, so we could face the provincial leaders and exchange views on criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. We were very familiar with the provincial leaders and talked calmly. Zhao Xinchu and others approved of this way of talking. They didn’t want society to become chaotic like the large-scale mass movement of 1969. The provincial leaders reached some consensus with us: 1. The provincial committee was actively turning, firmly criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. 2. Correctly treating the proletarian cultural revolution and the rebellious factions, all those “rolled” down should be brought back. 3. The “two clears and one batch” made mistakes of expansion (which we saw as errors in direction and路线, the rightist reversal and denial of the cultural revolution). However, opinions differed on whether rebellious leaders should be admitted into the party, promoted, or supported, and on whether the provincial party committee should follow Deng Xiaoping’s big rightist reversal, with Secretary Han Ningfu showing more opposition.
According to Lin Zizhong, Gu Jiantang, and others’ recollections: In late October 1976, Hu Houmin even twice approached Yu Wenbin[^62], the leader of the ‘Million Heroic Army.’ We and Hu Houmin both advocated cooperation with the ‘Million Heroic Army’ to deal with the ruling faction, but most rebels opposed, calling us ‘surrenderists.’
Under Hu Houmin’s call, in March 1976, rebels began to push the provincial party committee to turn. Hu Houmin assigned specific tasks: Cao Chengyi as frontline commander, Lin Zizhong as现场指挥, Yan Chang as secretary. Besides the main responsibility and staff, there were divisions for materials, propaganda, logistics, security, propaganda vehicles, briefings, engraving, slogans, water tower printing groups. Because most staff were from the new faction, Lin Zizhong joked that the counterattack against the rightist reversal was led by “new recruits with steel heads.” Under Hu Houmin’s leadership, the main actions of the rebels in Hubei in 1976 included:
-
Collect signatures from Central Committee members in Wuhan and some provincial and municipal revolutionary committee standing members to publish an open letter to the entire province, issuing critical articles and slogans, calling on the people to respond to Mao’s criticism of Deng and oppose the rightist reversal, closely linking with Hubei and Wuhan’s realities, and guiding cadres to “turn”. Most slogans were drafted by Hu Houmin’s staff team to unify thoughts and clarify main targets. Lin Zizhong and Cao Chengyi recalled: Hu Houmin attached great importance to slogans at each stage, likening it to leading troops—training daily, focusing on ideological education, preventing soldiers from idling, as without slogans, morale would drop and people would be at a loss.
-
On May 2, 1976, Zheng Jun recorded slogans and struggle strategies proposed by the staff team: “Inner tight, outer loose, promote from below, attack from above,深入基层，发动群众。” The four unchanged principles: “目标不变，湖北路线搞正，组织上要体现出来；决心不变；基调不变，也可以说是原则不变，去年七、八、九（月），是林（彪）、刘（丰）路线的继续；突破口不变，（省委第一书记、省革委会主任赵辛初1975年的）‘六四’报告（是执行邓小平的‘三项指示为纲’）。活动上灵活机动，重点在基层以革委会、（革命）领导小组为我们的活动手段。五月份争取有1/3的单位搞起来。抓点：武重、武钢、一冶、交通局、体委。” The “roll back” strategy involved: (1) urging from above, attacking from below, (2) tightening internally and loosening externally, (3) focusing on基层, and (4) unifying actions. This slogan was proposed by Gu Jiantang. It wasn’t new or invented by any individual but was based on experiences from Beijing and Shanghai during the 1974 Anti-Lin, Anti-Confucius campaign, communicated by Xia Bangyin to Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin. This phrase became the “tone” for usurpation of party power, along with Yan Chang’s “unchanged goal, resolution, tone, and breakthrough, with adaptable methods.” During the 1982-1983 trial of rebellious leaders, these were used to prosecute each person, and Shen Fuli also spent years in prison because of this. After the meeting, Peng Xun drafted several slogans as banners, and Cao Chengyi led people to plaster them across Wuhan’s three towns. Major slogans included: “Hubei has Zhao Xinchu, who spoke at the expansion meeting, waving Deng’s Shangfang sword, killing on June 4,” “June 4 speech is a poisonous weed, roll out and bring back,” “Two clears and one batch made mistakes in方向路线,” “Show mercy to rebels,” etc.
Wu Yanjin said: "What if we don’t do large-scale mass movements? We just promote the ‘turning’ within the provincial party committee on a small scale. The provincial leaders at that time dared not say they wouldn’t turn, instead they loudly shouted about ‘turning.’ The specifics of how and where to turn were the question. Hu Houmin led mass representatives from the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees twice to the provincial party committee standing committee to push for the committee. Why could we always smoothly enter the standing committee meeting? Because Xia Bangyin and Xie Wangchun, as central committee members in Wuhan, could naturally attend the meetings. When the standing committee met, Xia Bangyin would call Hu Houmin to inform him, and Hu would lead the team there, so it was a sure thing. ‘Breaking into’ the standing committee was also a charge in the sentencing. At that time, there was no real break-in, and few people wanted to break in but couldn’t. We were all representatives of the provincial and municipal revolutionary committees with IDs, and both times Xia Bangyin came out to let us in, so we could face the provincial leaders and exchange views on criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. We were very familiar with the provincial leaders and talked calmly. Zhao Xinchu and others approved of this way of talking. They didn’t want society to become chaotic like the large-scale mass movement of 1969. The provincial leaders reached some consensus with us: 1. The provincial committee was actively turning, firmly criticizing Deng and countering the rightist reversal. 2. Correctly treating the proletarian cultural revolution and the rebellious factions, all those “rolled” down should be brought back. 3. The “two clears and one batch” made mistakes of expansion (which we saw as errors in direction and路线, the rightist reversal and denial of the cultural revolution). However, opinions differed on whether rebellious leaders should be admitted into the party, promoted, or supported, and on whether the provincial party committee should follow Deng Xiaoping’s big rightist reversal, with Secretary Han Ningfu showing more opposition.
According to Lin Zizhong, Gu Jiantang, and others’ recollections: In late October 1976, Hu Houmin even twice approached Yu Wenbin[^62], the leader of the ‘Million Heroic Army.’ We and Hu Houmin both advocated cooperation with the ‘Million Heroic Army’ to deal with the ruling faction, but most rebels opposed, calling us ‘surrenderists.’
Under Hu Houmin’s call, in March 1976, rebels began to push the provincial party committee to turn. Hu Houmin assigned specific tasks: Cao Chengyi as frontline commander, Lin Zizhong as现场指挥, Yan Chang as secretary. Besides the main responsibility and staff, there were divisions for materials, propaganda, logistics, security, propaganda vehicles, briefings, engraving, slogans, water tower printing groups. Because most staff were from the new faction, Lin Zizhong joked that the counterattack against the rightist reversal was led by “new recruits with steel heads.” Under Hu Houmin’s leadership, the main actions of the rebels in Hubei in 1976 included:
-
Collect signatures from Central Committee members in Wuhan and some provincial and municipal revolutionary committee standing members to publish an open letter to the entire province, issuing critical articles and slogans, calling on the people to respond to Mao’s criticism of Deng and oppose the rightist reversal, closely linking with Hubei and Wuhan’s realities, and guiding cadres to “turn”. Most slogans were drafted by Hu Houmin’s staff team to unify thoughts and clarify main targets. Lin Zizhong and Cao Chengyi recalled: Hu Houmin attached great importance to slogans at each stage, likening it to leading troops—training daily, focusing on ideological education, preventing soldiers from idling, as without slogans, morale would drop and people would be at a loss.
-
On May 2, 1976, Zheng Jun recorded slogans and struggle strategies proposed by the staff team: “Inner tight, outer loose, promote from below, attack from above,深入基层，发动群众。” The four unchanged principles: “目标不变，湖北路线搞正，组织上要体现出来；决心不变；基调不变，也可以说是原则不变，去年七、八、九（月），是林（彪）、刘（丰）路线的继续；突破口不变，（省委第一书记、省革委会主任赵辛初1975年的）‘六四’报告（是执行邓小平的‘三项指示为纲’）。活动上灵活机动，重点在基层以革委会、（革命）领导小组为我们的活动手段。五月份争取有1/3的单位搞起来。抓点：武重、武钢、一冶、交通局、体委。” The “roll back” strategy involved: (1) urging from above, attacking from below, (2) tightening internally and loosening externally, (3) focusing on基层, and (4) unifying actions. This slogan was proposed by Gu Jiantang. It wasn’t new or invented by any individual but was based on experiences from Beijing and Shanghai during the 1974 Anti-Lin, Anti-Confucius campaign, communicated by Xia Bangyin to Zhu Hongxia and Hu Houmin. This phrase became the “tone” for usurpation of party power, along with Yan Chang’s “unchanged goal, resolution, tone, and breakthrough, with adaptable methods.” During the 1982-1983 trial of rebellious leaders, these were used to prosecute each person, and Shen Fuli also spent years in prison because of this. After the meeting, Peng Xun drafted several slogans as banners, and Cao Chengyi led people to plaster them across Wuhan’s three towns. Major slogans included: “Hubei has Zhao Xinchu, who spoke at the expansion meeting, waving Deng’s Shangfang sword, killing on June 4,” "JunePeople are still confined here, including Lu Liyan, Feng Tian’ai, Wang Shengrong, and others. I also once let off steam with Feng Tian’ai. Feng Tian’ai often argued with armed police back then, even resorted to violence. Once, the armed police didn’t win the fight, and the next day during the break, two police officers came in, grabbed his limbs, and threw him to the ground like a tamping ram. Feng Tian’ai didn’t care much and said, ‘I haven’t eaten enough, and when I’m full, I can beat several of you.’ The detention center kept a copy of the ‘People’s Daily’ and a magazine ‘Red Flag,’ which were first sent to me, then circulated around, and by the end, the words were unreadable, with some using it to swat mosquitoes.
The transcript of Hu Houmin’s statement in court on July 24, 1982, is in the hands of the authorities. Below is Hu Houmin’s follow-up transcript, kept by fellow inmate Shen Fuli, who took it out upon release.
Dear Judge:
I believe my issue is not a personal matter but a social one. Without personal statements, I want to speak for the tens of thousands of workers, peasants, soldiers, cadres, intellectuals, and young students who were injured, disabled, or killed during the ‘Cultural Revolution,’ who were criticized, fought, detained, and for their children and relatives to voice their grievances. <strong>Since the Cultural Revolution was entirely wrong, it is not a matter of right or wrong between you and me, nor can one side’s victims be justly evaluated and receive favorable treatment, while the other side’s victims, still bearing various charges (including long-term discrimination and rejection of their children and relatives), are not. The people are an inseparable whole, and the people’s courts should not take sides but should serve the entire people and uphold justice. We must not judge right or wrong based on whether we once opposed or supported ourselves, but should rely on law and facts, be impartial and fair, treating friends and foes equally. Isn’t everyone equal before the law? I believe it should be so here. If the issue of the Red Guards harming others is involved, I am willing to take full responsibility. Then, who should bear responsibility for the injuries caused by the ‘Million Heroic Army’? It cannot be said that this side is the people and the other side is not, can it?
Perhaps someone might say I am pleading for the people, and I will confidently tell him that this is an obligation. Therefore, I, on behalf of these victims and their families, hereby submit an oral complaint to the people’s court, hoping that the court will truly stand on the side of the people, uphold justice impartially, and seriously examine the case to reach a fair and factual conclusion. My claims are as follows: First, in the early stages of the ‘Cultural Revolution,’ those workers, peasants, soldiers, cadres, students, and intellectuals who actively participated in defending the Party Central Committee and Chairman Mao, and were accused of crimes such as ‘Three-Home Village,’ ‘Four-Home Shop,’ demons and monsters, anti-Party and anti-socialist elements, ‘Xiao Deng Tuo,’ etc., should be prosecuted according to national law if they indeed committed these crimes; if not, a factual and fair conclusion should be made. Who should be held responsible? What responsibility should be pursued?
Second, on March 17, 1967, the entire province was involved in the mass arrest of thousands of people under the label of ‘counter-revolution,’ with some injured, disabled, or killed. If these individuals were indeed counter-revolutionaries, they should be prosecuted according to law; if not, a factual and fair conclusion should be made. Who should be responsible? What responsibility?
Third, at the end of 1968, during the cleanup of the class ranks, Zeng Siyu reported to the Premier that in Hubei province, tens of thousands of class enemies were identified (I was present at the time, and there are speeches available). If these tens of thousands are indeed class enemies, they should be prosecuted according to law; if not, a fair conclusion should be made. Who should be responsible? What responsibility?
Fourth, in 1969, the Central Committee issued the ‘927’ directive (I have evidence that this document was orchestrated by Kang Sheng). Tens of thousands of people labeled as ‘North Decision Yang’ and ‘516’ in Hubei, who were beaten, criticized, arrested, injured, disabled, or killed—these numbers are unprecedented. I personally was branded as the mastermind behind the ‘516’ counter-revolutionary group in Hubei, the chief organizer of the ‘North Decision Yang’ reactionary organization, the main manipulator behind the scenes. If these facts are true, they should be prosecuted according to law; if not, a fair and factual conclusion should be made. Who is ‘North Decision Yang’? Did ‘516’ really exist in Hubei? This should be clarified to the people of the whole province, just as the Tianjin Municipal Party Committee announced there was no ‘516’ in Tianjin. Who should be responsible? What responsibility?
Fifth, in late 1970, during the peak of the crackdown on ‘North Decision Yang’ and ‘516,’ every time I was criticized, they demanded a radio, claiming it was my private setup and use. Yet, I lived over forty years and didn’t even know what a radio was. The court should investigate: if I indeed set up and used a radio, I should be prosecuted according to law; if not, a fair conclusion should be made about this sensational case. Who is responsible? What responsibility?
Sixth, after the end of 1976, many people in the province were branded as ‘Four Bigs’ (the Gang of Four), black hands, and black claws, and were beaten, criticized, detained, injured, disabled, or killed—these figures are incalculable. If true, they should be prosecuted according to law; if not, a fair conclusion should be made. Who is responsible? What responsibility?
If these issues are truly resolved with fairness and justice, I, Hu Houmin, am willing to be executed and die with no regrets. If not, even if I am executed, I will not be at peace. But I firmly believe that our great Party will make a fair and just conclusion. Whether I am sentenced to death or life imprisonment, it is up to you. But to show my sincerity to the Party and the people, I have written two short poems titled “Court Chant.”
First:
Flesh can be cut by a knife, but ideology cannot be extinguished by guns.
My head and body may be separated, but my soul still believes in Marxism-Leninism.
Second:
When I reach the gates of hell, I should return home like a traveler.
I once promised to dedicate my life to the Party, and I will not turn back when sacrificing.
One cut can end my life, but a thousand guns cannot defeat truth.
Party members do not fear death, daring to hold the truth and illuminate the universe.
“Hubei Daily” internal reference reporter Liang Xia wrote “The Public Trial of Huang Binyan, Zhu Hongxia, Hu Houmin, and Zhang Liguo for Counter-Revolutionary Cases at the Intermediate People’s Court of Wuhan City,” vividly recording Hu Houmin’s words and actions during the court trial. Excerpts are as follows:
On June 10, the Wuhan City Procuratorate filed a public prosecution against Xia, Zhu, Hu, and Zhang for conspiracy to overthrow the government. On June 28 and 29, the Intermediate People’s Court of Wuhan City served Hu with a copy of the indictment. Hu Houmin refused to accept it. Hu said he would not hire a lawyer and requested a United Nations lawyer. When the lawyer visited Hu on July 1, he said, “I can’t let them perform a double act, sorry, thank you, lawyer!” On the morning of July 5, the court again delivered the indictment and court notice to Hu. Hu immediately wrapped the two legal documents in toilet paper, put them in a cover, and threw them out of his cell. He wrote on the cover: “Dear Judge, I do not want to accept the indictment and court notice, and I insist on forcing them into my ‘iron house,’ claiming this is legal. I ask to return the originals, thank you!” Signed “The Hermit of the Iron House.”
Hu refused to answer questions during the court investigation. After returning to the detention center, he said, “Haha! It’s just that again, all old issues. I find it funny. The seizure of power in January was approved by Chairman Mao, so this is considered counter-revolutionary power seizure. How many counter-revolutionaries are there in the country?” Hu also said, “I have no trust in the court. Our case, the court can’t decide, and they don’t have the authority to decide. Someone will speak for us. It’s not that we look down on them; today, there are so many small cars in court, and it’s just the leaders watching TV. The attitude of how they handle us doesn’t matter. Wang Hongwen’s attitude was also bad? The verdict was life imprisonment, more severe than Yao Wenyuan. The better their attitude, the more suspicious they are.” After returning to the detention center, Hu angrily said, “Life is only a few times to fight; if I don’t say it now, there will be no audience in the future.” “No matter how many years Zhu, Xia, and Zhang are sentenced, I don’t care about that. I will fight with them!” Therefore, he disrespected the court, violated court rules, and deliberately called the prosecutor “Plaintiff,” the judge “Judge,” and the clerk “Clerk Miss.” When the court investigated his plan to commit the ‘126’ counter-revolutionary crime in 1967, Hu only said, “Adding crimes where there are none, why worry about words?” When the presiding judge announced the recess, Hu said again, “The judge won’t let me speak; the court should reason!” Hu also shouted in court, “People dare not fear death, so why use death to scare?” “Since ancient times, who has not died? Let my loyal heart illuminate history.”
From July 22 to 24, the court held debates on Hu Houmin’s case. Hu completely denied the charges in the indictment. He said that since ancient times, both sides could argue in a lawsuit, but during the entire court investigation, only the plaintiff’s side was heard, and the defendant’s side was ignored. It was obvious bias by the judge, which was illegal. First, claiming that the ‘126’ power seizure was counter-revolutionary was untenable. Second, the ‘Sixteen Articles’ of the Cultural Revolution mandated the ‘Four Bigs,’ so how could the actions we took be crimes? Third, the false accusations and persecution of veteran cadres were not true either. The arrest of Zhao Xinjian, Han Ningfu, and others on Wusheng Road was not a conspiracy. Yu Wenbin and others hiding some provincial leaders for a few days was not a conspiracy. The prosecutor’s arguments were well-founded, and they asked the court to impose a heavier sentence on Hu.
(August 24, 1982, Hu Bei Daily, "Internal Reference" No. 31, Issue 81)
Mao Zedong once called on revolutionaries to be “Five Not Fears.” Dismissal, expulsion from the Party, and imprisonment all fell on Hu Houmin, and he faced all three fears.
After sentencing, Hu Houmin considered practicing the fourth: divorce.
Hu Houmin married in 1964. His wife was a university graduate from Huazhong Agricultural College’s Horticulture Department before the Cultural Revolution, working as a technician at Qing Shan Seed Farm in Wuhan, with one son and one daughter. Hu Houmin loved his wife deeply. In 1980, he wrote two poems titled “Poem for Wife in Prison”:
One:
True love as if cut apart, sitting through the prison bottom without feeling lonely;
Although married for sixteen years, not resenting enduring half a lifetime in prison.
But guilty of long filial piety at home, also regretful of interrupted nurturing at the knees,
Love nest although damaged, ambition still not a man’s.
Two:
Wonderful spring girl’s heart is bright, beauty does not fall from the sky;
Flowers get their fragrance from the land, leaves lose their luster from the sky;
Deep love should be poured into roots and soil, true love should nurture the body’s glow,
If blood must be shed to irrigate the country’s fields, why cherish returning home?
During long detention, Hu Houmin missed his family more and more, longing for his wife. In “Prison Love Letters—Tune to Changxiangsi,” he wrote:
Short longing, long watching, waking up to emptiness and liking, when will the longing end?
Endure hunger, endure cold, unable to bear a day without the partner, eyes meet and look through.
But from the day of sentencing, he demanded a divorce and prepared to sit in prison alone. His wife initially disagreed, but Hu Houmin insisted, and she had to agree. On January 20, 1983, after more than six years of imprisonment, Hu Houmin received his fourth brother Zhou Shiming’s letter, who had sent a trial letter to Xiangbei Labor Reform Farm, and he replied:
In the afternoon, I received a reply from Hongshan District Court, the content is as follows: “Our court has received your letter of divorce lawsuit. The case is under review. If we need to contact you, we will notify you. Hongshan District Court. January 17, 1983.”
Later, Hu Houmin and his wife dissolved their engagement. In 1984, Hu Houmin learned that his beloved sister, Hu Qian, who was in Wuchang County doing farm work, was struck dead by lightning during labor, and his daughter Hu Ying, who was about to take the college entrance exam, died of leukemia. This was a thunderbolt for him. He tearfully wrote a long eulogy titled “Mourning for Daughter—Hu Ying.” When he learned that his ex-wife’s unit, Wuhan Qing Shan Seed Farm, had paid a large medical bill for his daughter’s treatment, Hu Houmin sent his family to prison with a meager living allowance of 20 yuan, and wrote in the remittance note: “Huge sum paid off after twelve years, only because of this meager effort.”
“If I can live to return someday, I will thank and repay.” (Hu thought he still had to serve 12 more years in prison at that time—note by the author)
Hu Houmin did not accept the verdict. His sister Hu Xiujun and Zhu Hongxia’s wife Zhu Aihua visited Hu Houmin at Xiangyang Machine Tool Factory in 1983 and found him fasting, giving his prison meal to other prisoners, nearly starving to death, and was saved by a prison doctor injecting glucose. After returning to Han, Hu Xiujun wrote to the secretary of Hubei Provincial Party Committee, Guan Guangfu, and Wuhan Mayor Wu Guanzheng, requesting Hu Houmin be allowed medical treatment outside prison, but was refused. The Xiangbei Farm built a row of bungalows for Hu Houmin at Liangpo Brick Factory, surrounded by high walls, with guards on the roof, and several criminals kept with Hu Houmin for surveillance. Hu Houmin joked that the detention place was called “Hu Family Courtyard.”
In the summer of 1986, Hu Xiujun and mother Chen Aidi visited Hu Houmin in Xiangfan, coincidentally finding him refusing to wear prison clothes or hang a prisoner badge on his chest. When higher authorities inspected the prison, Hu Houmin was put in solitary confinement and protested by fasting. On the fifth day of fasting, he was near death. The prison leaders told his family, “He is opposing us and not obeying prison rules. Want to die? It’s easy. We can report and have him executed.” They carried Hu Houmin out. His mother held him and fed him sugar water. After more than four hours, he woke up, blaming his mother and sister: “You shouldn’t have saved me.” In September 1990, 76-year-old Chen Aidi appealed to the court, claiming that the original sentence was miscalculated. After trial, the court ruled that his detention periods during the Cultural Revolution should be deducted, and Hu Houmin’s sentence should run from December 10, 1976, to March 9, 1992.
It is said that the authorities are considering an early release. On October 31, 1990, Hu Houmin died at Xiangbei Labor Reform Farm, completing his last journey of life at age 53. Expelled from the Party, dismissed from office, imprisoned, family torn apart, and lives shattered—Hu Houmin faced it all without fear and with unwavering sincerity, fulfilling the vow of a truth-seeker. <strong>Wang Hongwen, who passionately announced Mao Zedong’s spirit of “Five Fears” to the world, met Hu Houmin there. Is he ashamed or not?</strong>
Poetry Reflecting the Inner Heart of Rebel Leaders
Hu Houmin wrote over a thousand poems in his lifetime. However, the author was surprised to find that few people knew about this hobby during interviews. Yang Daoyuan was probably an exception; he recalled: because of the Cultural Revolution’s rebellion, he was severely persecuted by the authorities for many years. His sister abandoned her family to care for him after his birth, and her family was also troubled for a long time. When his sister died, Hu Houmin wrote a poem called “Crying Sister Yang” and sent it to me on a note, which I still keep from prison. Yang also said that he wrote a poem for his two daughters at their birth, and Hu Houmin also composed poems for them, but now they are lost. We all lived in separate cells, and later others left, leaving us separated by an empty room. Later, when we tidied up the room, Hu Houmin was moved next to me. Besides talking during breaks, we often knocked on the wall to exchange greetings (good morning, good evening…) and exchanged poems. My first child’s name was “Dongmei,” and I wrote a poem “Ode to the Plum”:
Wind and frost make survival difficult, steel bones fight the cold.
Rooted in the earth three thousand feet, a wave of ice and snow sends spring back.
He read it and said it was good. He also composed a poem:
“For Dongdong, dedicated to Father Yu’s shadow, inscribed with a photo”
Surprised to ask Dong girl, how fragrant are the buds?
Bitter rain urges early bloom, mother’s glow promotes early fragrance.
Admire the father’s blessing, lament the foolish uncle’s long sorrow.
The nation should revive, unfeeling is not Gan Jiang.
1981.12.1
Yang Daoyuan said: In winter 1981, his niece Hongxia from Henan came to Wuhan with her husband to see him. The detention center wouldn’t let her see him, but after two days of争取, she finally met him. Hongxia cried uncontrollably and said some words to him about taking care of his health. It was during this visit that he learned his beloved sister was no longer alive. Hongxia didn’t tell me; it was their argument with the guards that revealed this. When he heard this, the soldier told him. Hu Houmin had met his sister in 1974 and wrote a poem called “Crying Sister Yang” after hearing the news. He hid her poem in a dictionary cover and in a Russian book binding, so they couldn’t find it, and he was able to take it out when released:
“Crying Sister Yang”
On New Year’s Eve, I heard the thunder of clear sky, the rooster announced the New Year, and I was still awake.
Tears wet the pillow in the west room, a short poem mourning my sister in the east.
Crossing a wall is difficult to separate, but illness and pain cannot be suppressed.
Strongly hide pain in my heart, so my younger brother can have a peaceful New Year.
Originally, my younger brother didn’t know, now he does. Don’t be too sad, take care.
December 31, 1981, to January 1, 1982
Hu Houmin rarely showed his poetry to others. His first public poetry was at court. In prison, he compiled and recopied his poems into several notebooks, which he kept well.
His poetry covers a wide range of themes, with rich ideological connotations, revealing insight and reflection. Sarcastic and incisive, they criticize current issues, speak of unspoken words, and see what others do not. These poems naturally bear the marks of their times and also reflect Hu Houmin’s own ideological limitations and biases. Most of these are immediate reactions to reality and emotional states, recorded in the moment, with traces of rough drafts or semi-finished works, far from perfect art. However, these poems possess the most fundamental feature of poetry: sincerity. Since he mainly wrote for himself rather than others, he had no need to embellish or conceal. From the perspective of reflecting the inner thoughts and feelings of a rebel leader, they are even more precious. His poems include travel notes, exchanges with friends, reflections on nature and society, praise of noble spirits and laborers, and records of major life events such as factory entry, joining the Party, love, marriage, rural work, study classes, and mourning leaders. They also include strict self-discipline, self-criticism, encouragement, self-criticism, mockery, self-strategy, and self-reflection.
He wrote an introductory poem on the title page:
Poems written in blood, songs composed of tears. Dedicated to the dear Party, a loyal heart.
In Wuhan dialect, “prison” is pronounced “you,” and “prisoner” is a pun, symbolizing the “traveler” who writes poetry to express his resolve for “motherly love.”
Lu Xun called his writings “daggers and spears,” and Hu Houmin’s poetry is exactly that.
During the Cultural Revolution, he “angrily sought small poems among the knives,” to boost his fighting spirit.
At the end of 1969, when the central study class in Beijing focused on attacking the ‘North Decision Yang’ and ‘516,’ and harshly criticized Hu Houmin, Yang Daoyuan, and others, Hu Houmin recorded his feelings in poetry. He believed that the ruling faction within the Party forced the rebels to admit that opposing Chairman Mao was “the most painful” thing in their lives, pointing out that their denial of the Cultural Revolution and the revolutionary rebels caused “suspicion and evil”:
“Self-Deprecation—Reflections on the Central Study Class”
(1) Impressions from visiting the Three Stones Exhibition.
The Haihe and Hanjiang rivers were originally empty, flowing eastward in both south and north.
Under three mountains, we celebrate the five-star flag.
Waves love not to set, droplets of water contain infinite loyalty.
Despite winding through nine bends and eighteen turns, one should quickly return to the right path.
(2)>
People are not sages or saints; who has no faults? How can a single mistake be pushed down the river?
Teacher Qianhai often errs, why are you so obstructive to initial learning?
A dead horse is still used as a doctor for the living; how can a sick branch be cut like decayed wood?
Such defiance of teachings and opposition to public opinion, how can it not arouse suspicion and malice?
(Three)
What is most painful in life, nothing surpasses being forced to admit the benevolent elder.
A pen like a knife cuts through the chest meat, paper like a sword stabs at the lungs.
The knife sees the intestines, loyalty quickly turns the blade; the sword knows the heart's core, quickly returning the edge.
Yan Mountain lowers its eyebrows, flowers splash tears; North Sea mourns, moving the long sky.
<div
In June 1970, the Revolutionary Committee of Hubei Province held a broadcast meeting to criticize Hu Houmin. Hu Houmin wrote "Poem to the World — Reflections on the Provincial Broadcast Conference" mocking the authorities with satire and scorn, exposing their false accusations:
(1)
The grand "Workers' General" is famous at home and abroad, why bother to form a "Decide Faction"?
Who knew that the "North Meeting" started at East Lake, and also condemned "Yang Ping" for occupying the main street.
In this era, no one recognizes Lu Lian, and in previous lives, no one saw Feng Tian'ai.
Such a leader and chief, why accuse and blame?
(2)
A shout and a slam, everyone looks to the radio station.
Inside and outside, the code is there, sending scripts back and forth.
Three certificates confirm the verdict, a heinous crime to behead.
Poor me, with shallow eyes, I have yet to broaden my horizons in life.
In 1976, during his third imprisonment, as the prison truck passed through Dangyang, Hu Houmin wrote “Dangyang Chant”, reminiscing about ancient battles to encourage himself to rejoin the fight:
Farewell to Yiling, passing through Dangyang, seeking the ancient battlefield.
Windows full of people pointing at Changban Slope, looking out but not seeing the broken bridge.
Do not praise Zhao Yun as a hero, do not boast of Zhang Fei as invincible.
Look at the people of Exi today, standing tall, ignoring the past.
Since July 1982, Hu Houmin wrote more than 30 poems.
Some inspire his fighting spirit:
Infamy is not fixed by today, fame remains to be judged in the future.
History is full of reversals, ancient and modern, as examples.
Today’s difficulties in managing future affairs, future does not fear today’s punishments.
Though we may become ancient in the future, few descendants will report wins or losses.
Life has only a few chances to struggle, right and wrong,功罪 (merits and demerits), are subject to judgment.
Ancient heroes had countless achievements, but due to lost integrity, regrets are hard to settle.
I, a young man, lack talent to succeed, only to repay the Party for nurturing me for thirty years.
Knowing today’s matters, I do not regret my original aspirations.
Compared to great martyrs, it’s just a small matter.
"Court Opening Chant"
Snow-colored shirt, dark trousers, hem and cuffs, blue shoes, white socks, inside and outside.
Despite being splashed with sewage for several autumns, the blue and white still remain.
"Judgment Return Chant"
An old man in prison shows no mercy, dressed anew for court.
Sentenced to double ten years, still singing and dancing frequently.
Hu Houmin used poetry to sharply satirize the hypocrisy of the court and the ugliness of the judges:
Pre-trial for six winters, striving for excellence.
Miracles reward the diligent, creating a marathon in the legal arena.
"Refusal to Accept the So-Called Indictment"
Waiting for the snow to settle, then issuing the invitation.
Take it back to the director, see you on stage then.
"Reply to the Assigned Lawyers"
I prefer genuine solo, not fake double acts.
Keep thirty yuan, to my suffering mother.
I do not have special skills, but I know how to control the director behind the wall.
Don’t believe? Come to the backstage and see, talk east and west before the TV.
The plaintiff’s speech was never obstructed; the defendant asks to speak and raise their hand.
The judge does not sit on the scales, but stands with the plaintiff.
Why fear thousands of people speaking out? All mistakes make officials look foolish.
With no paper in hand, I argue passionately, sweat pouring down, reciting from memory.
Who can discern truth from falsehood? There are clear insights inside and outside the court.
After listening to the arguments, the court dismisses the plaintiff, full of lies and accusations.
If I pick a few quotes, they look just like the critique drafts of the past.
Hu Houmin’s iron will and tender feelings. On April 1, 1982, as the prison truck passed by his home, Hu Houmin composed a poem:
"Passing by Home"
The truck passes by, feelings surge, wishing to fly out the window.
Tears in my eyes, longing to unlock the iron cage, sending messages to my mother.
After sentencing, Hu Houmin had not seen his family for seven years. In his "Reply to Mother," he wrote:
Love is sewn by mother’s hands, grief floods the heart of the prisoner.
Forehead pressed against the iron window, tears long at the door, longing for mother.
Hu Houmin’s family said: "Hu chose a dead end," "The Communist Party is imprisoning and killing him, but he still remains loyal to the Party and Chairman Mao."
Hu Houmin’s understanding of the Cultural Revolution was consistent. Liu Yingfa said: "During the Cultural Revolution, Hu often said that the rebels are the children of the Cultural Revolution, and once the Cultural Revolution ends, we are finished. Denying the rebels is denying the Cultural Revolution, and denying the Cultural Revolution is denying the rebels." In 1970, Hu told Peng Juwei of Wuhan Medical College: "If you rebel against them now, even if you kneel to them, they will not let you go. Because you are a leader, you cannot shift the responsibility downward." After Chairman Mao’s death, Hu told Zhu Hongxia, Liu Yingfa, Wu Hengrung: "The current situation is very dangerous, and the Cultural Revolution may end prematurely. The Cultural Revolution must not be denied; we are like the children of the Cultural Revolution, connected with it by blood and flesh."
The rebels in Hubei and Wuhan have no connection with the Gang of Four.Organizational contacts.
**Liu Yingfa said that Hu Houmin often said: "Wuhan rebels are motherless children." Li Chenghong also said: During the Cultural Revolution, Hu Houmin often said that the rebels in Hubei and Wuhan are motherless children, with no one in the central government. Shanghai and Liaoning go without saying, and in Henan there are Ji Dengkui and Liu Jianxun, while Sichuan has "Two Supports" (Liu Jieting and Zhang Xiting). The rebels in Hubei and Wuhan relied entirely on their understanding of central documents and the "two reports and one publication" to carry out their movements, completely blind to the deeper situation above.
Gu Jiantang recalled: After the fall of the Gang of Four, Zhao Xinchu once said, **"The Wuhan rebels have no organizational contact with the Gang of Four, but they were more influenced by the Gang of Four ideologically than we were."** Wu Yanjin said that among the Wuhan rebels, only Dong Minghui attended a central study class in 1974 and had met Wang Hongwen several times, discussing a few times. Dong Minghui conveyed Wang Hongwen's speech spirit at a Wuhan meeting. Dong Minghui was a pro-military faction; he opposed the actions of Xia, Zhu, and Hu, and was called a "surrenderer" by the rebels. However, the authorities, in order to tie the Hubei rebels to the Gang of Four, also arrested Dong Minghui and kept him in prison for several years.
In April 1976, Hu Houmin and others sent Lin Zizhong, Li Chenghong, and others to Beijing to find the head of the All-China Federation of Trade Unions, Jin Zumin (one of the leaders of the Shanghai General Labour Union during the Cultural Revolution). Lin Zizhong said: When Li Chenghong was in Zhengzhou, he wrote a letter to Jin Zumin in the name of Xia Bangyin, and Li Chenghong also filled out the guest list at the general union’s gate. Possibly due to handwriting suspicion, the security guard replied that Comrade Zumin was not present. Later, we sent materials reflecting the Wuhan movement to the State Council petition office on Fuyou Street. Li Chenghong said: In the summer of 1977, factory special case team member Chen Zhiyin told me one day that I almost got thrown into prison. I asked what happened, and he said it was about our visit to the general union. Chen said: Fortunately, a cadre from the general union remembered clearly that we did not see Jin Zumin, otherwise it would have been hard to explain. How could the Wuhan special case team believe this cadre? This cadre testified that he remembered this matter very clearly; originally, Jin Zumin was going to meet us, but this cadre saw that I had written a note for Xia Bangyin that was exactly the same handwriting as when I registered at the general union’s gate, so they concluded that the four of us forged Xia Bangyin’s note and refused to meet us. This well-founded and logical testimony made the case group not believe him. Thus, my small mistake, combined with the meticulousness and truthfulness of the cadre’s testimony, unexpectedly saved me from prison and disappointed the Wuhan Hubei case group. They had barely dug up some clues, but it instead proved the innocence of the Wuhan rebels’ organizational relationship with the Gang of Four.
One of the evidence listed by the Hubei Xia Zhu Hu special case group linking the rebels with the Gang of Four was that Zhu Hongxia, Xia Bangyin had several contacts with Tang Qishan in Henan, which precisely proved that the Hubei rebels had no connection with the Gang of Four. Regarding the claim that they sent black materials to the Gang of Four, Xia Bangyin said in court during his defense and final statement: “The Party Constitution and the Constitution both stipulate that it is permissible to report situations to the Central Committee and Chairman Mao. During the 1969 movement to oppose the old, Premier Zhou told Zhu Hongxia and others: ‘In the future, if you have opinions and situations, you should inform us. You are the new forces of the revolutionary committee. The situations you report and your opinions, do we not look at them?’ I believe I am a central committee member; reporting in writing to Chairman Mao and the Central Committee about the situation of provincial leaders is legal, not slander. The materials were not only sent to the Gang of Four but also to ‘Chairman Mao, Hua Guofeng, and Chen Xilian,’ etc.”
Hu Houmin sincerely believed in Mao Zedong’s theory of continuing revolution under the dictatorship of the proletariat. Since the founding of New China, the Party and government have always claimed that the working class is the leading class, and during the Cultural Revolution, the status of the working class was elevated even further, with Mao Zedong proposing that “the working class must lead everything.” Some rebel leaders believed that Mao Zedong’s establishment of the “three-in-one” power structure during the Cultural Revolution was actually setting up opposition within the Party for bureaucrats, implementing mutual supervision. In the mid-20th century, socialism was still advancing vigorously worldwide, and the flaws of capitalism were fully exposed. Mao Zedong also clearly saw that the ruling party was corrupting beyond redemption; unchecked power inevitably leads to corruption. Mao’s “three-in-one” was truly a genius idea and practice. Hu Houmin’s experience during the Cultural Revolution was a struggle of the masses against the bourgeoisie within the Party, political persecution, and fighting for their rightful rights. Although the rebels had shortcomings and mistakes during the Cultural Revolution, they did not aim to overthrow the dictatorship of the proletariat; their subjective will was to maintain and consolidate the socialist system led by the Communist Party, not to overthrow it. Their rebellious actions during the Cultural Revolution were not for personal power, nor did anyone profit from them. Opposing the ruling faction required dedication, risking and paying a price. They did not violate the laws at that time; even the serious issues of the Cultural Revolution were merely a matter of ideological struggle. Therefore, labeling them as “counter-revolutionaries” has no technical meaning; if they were labeled “counter-revolutionaries,” I believe Hu Houmin would admit guilt.
Hu Houmin’s court statement also involved issues of judicial justice. Since the authorities want to deny the Cultural Revolution entirely, not only rebels who violated laws during the Cultural Revolution should be held accountable, but also the crimes committed by the Hubei Provincial Party Committee during the Cultural Revolution—such as the persecution of Li Dazhao and others, the “Three Villages” at Wuhan University, and the “Black Gangs” like Cheng Yun (Party Secretary of Wuhan Cultural Bureau), Wu Keren (Vice Chairman of Wuhan Federation of Literary and Art Circles)—the Red Guards who injured or killed people during the “Destroy the Four Olds” campaign, the Million Heroes who injured or killed in martial clashes, and the ruling faction who purged class ranks, investigated the “Five One Six” and “Northern Decision Yang,” and after the Cultural Revolution, fabricated false cases and forced deaths. Their crimes are heinous; why are they not prosecuted? To call the Cultural Revolution, led collectively by Mao Zedong and including Deng Xiaoping, Liu Shaoqi, Chen Yun, Ye Jianying, and Li Xiannian, “errors,” and then blame all these “errors” on the rebel masses, and to describe the “Four Major Campaigns” in the “Sixteen Points” adopted at the Eighth Central Committee’s 11th Plenum as “subversive propaganda, slander, and persecution,” and to punish actions legally permitted before by using post-Cultural Revolution criminal law—such a trial cannot stand the test of history, nor can it convince the world.
Senior leaders of the central government, including the reputedly upright Chen Yun【nonsense—editor’s note】 and the most enlightened Hu Yaobang【nonsense—editor’s note】, all emphasized that the prominent Red Guards and conservative leaders from back then did not belong to the “Three Types of People”[^66], and those to be promoted to the third echelon should indeed be promoted. The treatment of Yu Wenbin, the leader of the “Million Heroes” after the Cultural Revolution, was vastly different from Xia, Zhu, Hu, and Zhang. Due to the authorities’ favoritism, their atrocities have never been even symbolically punished. “Compared with these two completely different standards of investigation, what legal fairness can be claimed for this (the campaign to investigate the “Three Types of People”)?” (Song Yongyi, “A Historical Topic Urgently in Need of In-depth Study—Rebels and the ‘Three Types of People’”)
A rebel worker said, we responded to the call of the Party Central Committee and Chairman Mao to participate in the Cultural Revolution and rebelled. Now the Party Central Committee says the Cultural Revolution was a mistake, and they blame us, the workers and students who listened to the Party. Who will believe the Communist Party anymore?
Hu Houmin did not defend himself but dared to speak for the countless people who suffered injustice, demonstrating his leadership qualities.
Hu Houmin’s words to visitors in prison.People say, “Hope the historian of history still shows the true face of history.” This is his final words left to the world.
According to the 2006 draft revised in March 2013
