Recently, the WeChat official account of the China Reform National Security Department has successively published articles such as “Beware! Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing” and “Caution! Foreign Black Hands Are Extending Toward Minors,” revealing multiple typical cases of minors engaging in acts that harm national security. The Nazi government claims that these cases reflect a rising trend in recent years of minors committing acts that endanger national security under the influence of foreign espionage and intelligence agencies, which should attract high social attention.
We all know that the economic base determines the superstructure. In the forty years after China’s capitalist restoration, the originally socialist China’s spirit of mutual help, unity, and selflessness has been replaced by the selfish, profit-driven, and morally corrupt atmosphere of capitalism. Under such a climate, children raised in the cold interests of capitalism naturally become contaminated with its foul odor, becoming selfish and aggressive. In short, in the era of imperialism, the morality of minors has become increasingly corrupt — but does this moral decay ultimately lead to the path of “selling out” as spies? Why does the China Reform government suddenly emphasize the need to be vigilant about spies infiltrating children? Why is the Chinese government even afraid of children?
In fact, the China Reform government is never afraid of the spread of morally corrupt tendencies. On the contrary, the widespread dissemination of such trends in society actually helps to consolidate their rule because moral decay is fundamentally a reaction of private ownership ideas, closely related to the capitalist system. The Nazi China’s call to beware of minors endangering national security is actually aimed at strengthening the dictatorship over the working class children, attempting to clear “negative” and “dark” social conflict news from children’s minds.
This idea of “corrosion” of minors causes them to fear greatly: as can be seen from their proposed solutions to “danger”: they claim that minors’ “endangering national security” is mainly due to “lack of national security awareness,” “family education guidance deficiencies,” “school education management lapses,” and “blind spots in online protection,” thus insisting on “cultivating patriotic consciousness” — that is, fostering Nazi education from a young age, cultivating Nazi party members; “strengthening family education guidance” (originally called combining teaching and punishment) — that is, increasing the pressure in feudal families to instill hierarchical class consciousness; “enhancing school education” (originally called legal case explanation) — that is, intensifying brainwashing education to ensure bourgeois schools can mass-produce “loyal servants who can generate profits for the bourgeoisie without disturbing the peace of their masters”; and “improving online protective walls” (originally called source control) — that is, increasing review and suppression of online space, depriving the masses of free speech rights, persecuting speech fighters, and ensuring children have a “carefree childhood.”
Under the Nazi vision, the “youth counter-espionage” policy would bring them substantial benefits — at least consolidating their class dictatorship, and further, cultivating a group of supporters for their class is not impossible. However, the reality is contrary to Nazi wishes. In fact, the class contradictions in today’s China Reform society have become extremely sharp, with no room for reconciliation between exploiters and the exploited. Even children have spontaneously felt this: in the so-called “left turn wave,” “awakening wave,” and “darkening wave,” many children are often seen — of course, it must be pointed out that these waves are all non-proletarian.
Many children born into petty bourgeois families have spontaneously recognized the reactionary nature of Nazi China; they are already burdened by heavy academic pressure, making it difficult to move forward. Poor children take charge early, and children of the working class face even more precarious lives, constantly suffering from severe exploitation leading to poverty, and facing the risk of dropping out of school, changing careers, or wandering. The seeds of class hatred, sown by injustice and bullying, have long been planted in their hearts; under the burning fire of hatred, they grow rapidly. Their hatred and understanding of the Nazi government are even deeper.
The oppression in real life has led many teenagers to take different paths of opposition to Nazi China through their own exploration. Their opposition to the Chinese government may be anarchist, petty-bourgeois, or narrow personal hatred, which fundamentally cannot shake the rule of the China Reform government but to some extent also poses challenges to its rule. This creates many unstable factors, which are also suppressed by the China Reform government.
However, fascist policies are not a sign of the fascist regime’s strength; on the contrary, they only prove its extreme weakness and fury’s impotence. Such measures, in fact, only intensify and accelerate the resistance of the masses against the fascist regime, ultimately hastening the demise of the Nazi government itself. All teenagers and young people dissatisfied with the reactionary rule of the current Chinese government should realize: only under the guidance of Marxism and the Communist Party can revolution succeed. One finger breaks easily, but five fingers clenched into a fist can do much. Only when countless subtle forces unite can they form a mighty river to completely break through the rotten dam of China’s revisionist traitor clique!
Reference news: 【https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_29680271】
1 Like