On January 23rd, I saw the latest developments in the case of the missing female master’s student Bu Xiaohua. Two villagers have been prosecuted for rape, but Bu Xiaohua’s nominal “husband” Zhang Moujun was not prosecuted [news link to be added]. In the initial report,\n\u003e Regarding whether there was suspicion of rape, the report states that after investigation, Zhang knew that Bu (note: Bu Xiaohua) had a mental illness but still engaged in a relationship with her and fathered children, which is suspected of a crime, and criminal coercive measures have been taken by the public security authorities.\n\nHowever, in the prosecutor’s non-prosecution decision, it states that Bu Xiaohua often goes to the convenience store to buy snacks, freely enters and leaves the village and her residence, and has complete freedom of movement, without any restrictions. It also states that Zhang Moujun takes care of Bu’s daily life and routines, and no abuse was found. But Bu’s brother said that his sister’s condition was more serious than when she first went missing, and she could not fully take care of herself, only handling basic needs like going to the toilet and eating. After treatment, her condition improved. If Zhang Moujun had not abused Bu Xiaohua, then how could her condition have worsened? Moreover, Zhang Moujun clearly targeted Bu Xiaohua to make her a compliant female with mental abnormalities, trying to turn her into a tool to satisfy his lust and pass on his lineage. When volunteer investigators asked Bu Xiaohua, she could clearly state her family and school names. If Zhang Moujun truly wanted to help Bu return home, it would be an easy task. But over more than ten years, he did not do so. What is he thinking? Isn’t it obvious?\nAnd the court also tries to whitewash Zhang Moujun, claiming that the fact that this beast had a relationship with Bu Xiaohua and fathered children is fundamentally different from rape. They say that the first relationship happened two or three months after they met, implying that just because they didn’t meet and immediately have sex, it doesn’t count as rape. Isn’t this because Zhang Moujun was testing and waiting for the right moment to commit violence? They say Zhang Moujun subjectively aimed to establish a family with Bu Xiaohua, which is a shameless defense by male chauvinists. In fact, isn’t this just rape of a woman who has no ability to defend herself sexually? To say that not being able to refuse equals consent? Using the subjective intention of forming a family to whitewash such a heinous crime of rape is a new level of shamelessness.\nFurthermore, the prosecutor states that the other two villagers had multiple sexual relations with Bu Xiaohua, who was mentally abnormal and unable to properly express her will. They say, “The criminal facts are clear, the evidence is sufficient and conclusive, the circumstances are heinous, and they should be prosecuted for rape according to relevant laws.” But why is it that Zhang Moujun, in the same situation when having sex with Bu Xiaohua, is not prosecuted? Why is he not prosecuted but instead not prosecuted at all? This clearly shows that the court is standing on the side of maintaining patriarchal family structures, defending the brutal rule of husbands over wives. In a patriarchal society, the family is outside the law, a place where husbands commit barbaric enslavement of wives. All the law that runs rampant is shattered when faced with the “sacred” concept of family, which is truly a spectacle. In fact, the phrase “The family is the smallest state, and the state is made up of countless families,” indicates that in a class society, the family is also a battleground of class struggle. As Engels said, within it—husbands are the capitalists, and wives are the proletariat. Therefore, just as society’s laws tend to favor the bourgeoisie, within the family, the laws also tend to favor the husband, the ruler of the household.\n“山西女硕士失踪案”最新进展：案件进入审查起诉阶段，涉案人员或涉强奸罪_腾讯新闻
