Capitalists go all out, America's 'constitutional crisis'

Creation: Proletarian Liberation Struggle Association Historical Materialism Group

  On November 19th, local time, Trump announced the nomination of Wall Street financier Kantor Fitzgerald and Howard Lutnick, owner of BGC Group, as U.S. Secretary of Commerce. The function of the Commerce Department in the United States is to facilitate communication between the U.S. government and private capital enterprises, and to represent the interests of the entire bourgeoisie in external business activities. In the past, the visit of Commerce Secretary Raimondo under the Biden administration to China was ridiculed by Chinese pinks, but Raimondo, who represents capitalist interests, was not a direct Wall Street billionaire. However, the Commerce Department, which should nominally represent the “U.S. government” and maintain a “neutral” position, is actually being dominated by a capitalist, which can be described as “self-dealing.” This is a sharp mockery of the U.S. bourgeoisie’s long-standing boast of “separation of powers” and “American-style democracy.” In bourgeois terms, it is now called a “constitutional crisis.”

  Lutnick’s appointment is not isolated but connected to a series of events. Not only is Trump himself a monopolist capitalist, but Trump’s biggest capitalist supporter, Elon Musk, the richest person in the U.S. and the world, along with Vivek Ramaswamy, co-founder of Strive Asset Management and brother-in-law of U.S. Vice President Vance, was previously nominated by Trump as the head of the new U.S. department “Department of Government Efficiency”. Although the department’s powers are currently unclear, based on available information, it is speculated that it will have considerable influence over the U.S. government’s national budget, which means they will have significant control over the U.S. treasury. Additionally, another of Trump’s monopolist supporters, Linda McMahon, wife of Vince McMahon, was nominated by Trump as the U.S. Secretary of Education. Compared to Biden’s cabinet, Trump’s cabinet is filled with large capitalists who run their own industries and are directly appointed to departments related to their interests.

  The reason Trump openly shows that his current U.S. government will serve bourgeois interests is deeply rooted. As the class struggle in the U.S. sharpens, the Democratic Party’s “diversity” deceptive policies have long since collapsed. History has proven that Barack Obama, the Black president, did not represent Black masses’ interests; Indian-American Vice President Harris did not represent Indian-American or working women’s interests; and various minority groups and LGBT individuals are merely hypocritical priests serving the interests of U.S. monopolist capitalists as running dogs. After Biden’s government massively creates inflation, openly supports fascist atrocities committed by Israeli reactionaries, and brutally suppresses American supporters of Palestine and other progressives, the American people have long seen through the reactionary nature of the Democratic Party. Therefore, when Obama loudly promoted voting for Harris, who “understood” and “related” to them based on their similar backgrounds, the American people angrily condemned “Obama has never done anything for Black people,” “Harris doesn’t understand” the suffering of Black masses, “Deceive me once, shame on you; deceive me twice, shame on myself.” Although this does not mean that the American people will support fascist Trump, Harris’s disgrace has exposed her as a paper tiger—losing the 2024 presidential election with many Democratic financial backers and politicians switching support to Trump, resulting in her losing with a vote count of 226 to 312. How unpopular the Democratic Party is has become very obvious.

  The American people have long been tired of Biden and Harris’s lies, and American capitalists are also dissatisfied with Biden’s inability to suppress the masses and maintain the U.S. capitalist system, wishing to replace the ineffective Biden and Harris with a “more powerful” presidential candidate—Trump. With the support of many capitalists, Trump was elected as the new president, and in the face of intense class struggle, he will inevitably peel away the veneer of bourgeois democracy and increasingly reveal the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie. Previously, Trump had already concentrated the “three powers in one” through election, Congress, and judicial appointments, contemptuously dismissing the U.S. “democratic system,” and now appointing openly capitalist ministers further proves that “practical” capitalists will replace “incompetent” bourgeois politicians to better execute the will of the entire bourgeoisie. The current “constitutional crisis” in the U.S. clearly demonstrates that the objective law of class struggle does not change with human will. No matter how much bourgeois liberals or other bourgeois defenders praise the “stability” of so-called “American democracy,” it will inevitably be abolished by the bourgeoisie through fierce popular struggle, replaced by increasingly fascist brutal repression. Similarly, Trump and the American monopolist bourgeoisie have greatly miscalculated. They think that strengthening dictatorship and replacing the worn-out “freedom and democracy” banner with the fascist slogan “Make America Great Again” is clever, but in reality, they are just paper tigers like Biden and Harris. Wherever there is oppression, there will be resistance. The American people heroically defeated the fascist coup attempt of American fascists ninety years ago, forced the unpopular Trump to step down four years ago, and now will fiercely oppose the re-emergent Trump. Trump’s idolization of Hitler has long ended in Berlin’s bunker, and he is nailed to the shameful column of history. The Chinese fascist Xi Jinping, whom he praised, is also entangled internally and externally. If he dares to turn the U.S. into a fascist hell, his fate will not be much better than theirs. No matter how tortuous the future anti-fascist struggle in the U.S. is, the American people will ultimately achieve victory. Trump and his ilk can come and go, but the American people are always the American people!

1 Like

The replacement of the leading figures of the ruling class is a result of the overall changes in the social class struggle, which has forced the bourgeoisie to alter its policies. The class struggle of the American people is driving this political shift. In 2023, the United States experienced the broadest wave of strikes in decades, including large-scale protests across multiple industries such as film and television, manufacturing, healthcare, education, retail, hospitality, and media. By mid-December, over 500,000 people nationwide participated in strikes, far exceeding the levels of previous years.

Class struggle is usually accelerated, and the struggle of the American people will not be limited to the level of 2023 but will develop toward a direction that more profoundly shakes the capitalist rule. Therefore, in the face of such a ruling crisis, the American bourgeoisie must change its mode of rule, replacing the previous bourgeois democratic system with open and brutal repression. The realization of the unification of the three powers and the appointment of bourgeois directly as government ministers by Trump are manifestations of this change. The strike data is from: Strike Data

I feel like the relationships and stances of these ministers are not very clear, and the explanations of various relationships later on are a bit jumpy. The author should explain it, otherwise it’s hard to understand :thinking:

The beginning aims to express the announcement made by Trump on November 19th (local time), nominating major Wall Street financiers Kantor Fitzgerald and Howard Lutnick of BGC Group as U.S. Secretary of Commerce. The relationship with the subsequent content is that it criticizes the role and function of the U.S. Department of Commerce, highlighting how it represents capitalist interests and questioning the supposed separation of powers and democratic principles in the U.S., thus implying a ‘crisis’ of constitutional governance.

Actually, I don’t quite understand. Does it mean that the intense class struggle situation in the United States has forced the American bourgeoisie to directly come to the forefront to suppress the people?

More materials should be provided. There is no indication here of what the usual appointment practices for U.S. officials are, nor any reference to U.S. legal provisions. Also, isn’t the separation of powers referring to the “legislative, executive, and judicial” branches? How has this incident shaken that system? It doesn’t seem to be clearly reflected, and in the end, it is not clearly explained how it leads to a constitutional crisis.

This news is similar to a series of news articles. Covering everything in a single article can be a bit difficult and may become too lengthy and dilute the main theme. Later on, it might be helpful to add entries like glossary terms and related news, so that people who don’t understand can find a place to learn.

1 Like

It is a satire of the pink side both praising Trump and mocking the Democratic government as a bourgeois government that is very “inept,” unable to better help the bourgeoisie rule the country, but compared to the reactionary Democratic Party, Trump would be even more reactionary, not even wanting formal democracy. In fact, this also serves as a lead-in to the discussion of the “constitutional crisis.”

Pretty much

These mainly relate to common knowledge about the American political system, such as the American bourgeois constitution claiming to be a “separation of powers” system with checks and balances. However, when composed of a bunch of capitalists, it’s equivalent to concentrating power in the hands of capitalists, especially in departments like the Department of Commerce, which directly involves capitalists dealing with themselves. The ministers are all capitalists, so how the Department of Commerce handles its relationship with the government and the bourgeoisie is even more obvious. Explaining the constitutional crisis is quite complex, but roughly speaking, the U.S. government has always claimed to be a super-class state, a “third party” that mediates between bourgeoisie and workers’ interests. Its bourgeois democratic constitution exists to reconcile class interests. The Democratic Party’s policies have always been like this; for example, Biden often acts as a mediator during major American workers’ strikes, such as auto workers, dockworkers, and railway workers strikes. But Trump’s behavior is like directly declaring that the government serves the capitalists, not even bothering to pretend. If you don’t understand these points, just ask directly.