Moreover, Lu Xun was also not welcomed by the Nationalist Government. Lu Xun was attacked not only by the Nationalist Government’s official literati but also by the bourgeois petty-bourgeois right-wing intellectuals hidden within the Communist Party. Lu Xun’s articles were based on the revolutionary situation in China at that time, using Marxist literary theory to criticize feudal culture, Confucianism, the oppression of women, and the Nationalist Government’s slander of the communist movement. This kind of idiotic revisionist composer is simply not worthy to be mentioned in the same breath as Lu Xun.
Furthermore, judging from the content of this song, and comparing it with other revolutionary songs, it is clear that many revolutionary songs from the socialist period talk about class struggle, the socialist revolutionary cause, and accuse the exploiting class of numerous crimes. However, this song contains none of those elements. On the eve of the world war crisis, it loudly proclaims, “The battle will continue, full of passion, hearts soaring, we are the young Lenin moving forward! Youth of October,” pretending to mention Lenin, but in reality, it does not discuss the enslavement and persecution of the broad Soviet people by the Soviet revisionist government. It also disgustingly says, “The globe’s heat and cold are uneven, the world’s rich and poor hard to equalize, global youth united as one, transforming the world striving to be the vanguard,” using this vulgar analogy to replace actual class struggle. It also talks about uniting as one and transforming the world, which in fact means establishing a “community of shared human destiny,” asking the world’s youth to support the Soviet revisionists and America’s wars, portraying the Soviet revisionists as the just side.
To be frank, I am actually just a neutral observer. I came to this forum because after watching B站 (Bilibili), I became very interested in related topics and wanted to understand the revolutionary people’s spirit and demeanor. Honestly, I think you are all very hardworking and brave, with a high level of theoretical understanding. Compared to the leftist circles online, your level is much higher, and your quality is also good. How should I put it? If one day you succeed, I hope that at that time I can have an open and free discussion with you. Right now, I am just an opportunist with a low level of theory, and if I make any mistakes in my forum posts, I welcome your corrections.
Although the forum does not exclude such behavior, I feel that your statement still has problems. You talk about neutral observers, but such people simply do not exist. In a class society, everyone either stands on the side of the oppressed class against the oppressing class, or stands on the side of the oppressing class against the oppressed class. If one is not on the side of socialism, then consciously or unconsciously, one supports the rule of capitalism and hinders the progress of the revolution. Some petty bourgeois who have goodwill towards revolutionary activities, due to their residual capitalist thinking, hesitate and waver when it comes to further participation in the revolution. This is completely understandable, but it can never be used as a reason for not transforming oneself or not revolting; it is entirely unreasonable.
What you are saying is nothing more than a defense of the legitimacy of your own position. Moreover, your remarks about low-theoretical-level speculators are also quite ridiculous. Either you deliberately lower yourself in order to avoid condemnation through such means, so you can continue to keep your lifestyle or secretly maintain your erroneous views while feeling justified in doing so, or you are openly shameless, believing that engaging in speculative activities is nothing to be ashamed of. I believe both points are wrong and reactionary.
It has updated the video and responded to your article criticizing him.
Some voices of justice appeared in the comment section:
“May I ask, I have no ill intentions. Is the Workers’ Diary (工人日记) just leftist jargon? How do you view the Workers’ Diary? The content is all about helping workers demand wages from ZBJ (Zhubajie). Isn’t that the most convincing?” — yyuggtt
“Why only the first two parts? Could you also make the third part and the following discussions for everyone to see?” — kuma1917 (seems to be a newcomer)
He said, “Making hats, you have good craftsmanship.”
The article received 800 views. What do you think?
In the comment section, some people said that Brown Bear is very hypocritical. He has a labor diary that he doesn’t post but posts a school diary instead, then on one hand accuses the association of corrupting minors while on the other hand cyberbullying minors (using mocking music and sarcastic titles to repost posts without permission, which is bullying). Then Brown Bear stubbornly argued, later saying that other B friends didn’t oppose it either. Then that person said, “Am I not a B friend?” In the end, under public pressure, he was forced to delete the video of the school diary. Brown Bear also made some replies, such as saying Bilibili is popular because of games, and that the labor diary has no traffic, directly revealing that he reposted the post just to gain traffic.
From his recent replies, it is clear that Brown Bear is very hypocritical. He claims not to oppose the true left but posts videos supporting foreign revolutionary organizations. Then he posts videos mocking school diaries, saying that factory diaries are too long to post, but aren’t school diaries short? Moreover, he originally intended to “continue updating.” So, in reality, when struggling against the bourgeoisie, isn’t he still the so-called “true left” or the so-called “internet left”? He avoids this issue, does not support it, and instead insults and mocks in every possible way, outright calling the association a network gang, and openly stating that posting other content would get more traffic. This only exposes his reactionary stance of attacking and slandering on one hand, while on the other hand engaging in pragmatic reactionary tactics to gain traffic.
It’s known as something counterrevolutionary, and yet it’s being criticized here by robots. What’s the point of this link? Isn’t this spreading toxic weeds?
These people are essentially just for traffic. After all, today’s self-media is adept at taking statements out of context. But it is precisely this kind of people who can, leveraging the existing platforms of the middle class, output their own viewpoints indiscriminately. What these people are doing is the same as the demonization of communists by the Kuomintang in the last century, the same as those who slander communists and come up with so-called “revolutionary wives,” and they are clearly in the existing bourgeois system of vested interests, so they naturally also need to, as much as possible, suppress the struggle of the proletariat.