Bribery, accepting bribes, student council

Creation: Marxist Philosophy Group of the Proletarian Liberation Struggle Association

  Recently, according to reports from multiple media outlets, students’ union officials at Xinyang High School in Henan Province confiscated classmates’ phones and demanded a high “ransom fee” of 300 yuan per device (for returning the phone) and a “gag fee” (not informing teachers about the phone). A notice on November 11 stated that after preliminary investigation, the school confirmed the situation was true, and four involved student union officials had been expelled from the student union. Further actions will be taken based on the investigation results of public security authorities. However, this is not the first time such bribery and corruption incidents among students have occurred. As early as 2015, media reported that a sixth-grade vice class monitor at an elementary school extorted over 20,000 yuan through institutional violence for profit.[1]

  The occurrence of bribery and corruption phenomena on campus has surprised some people; they cannot understand—how could minors, innocent and naive, who have not yet experienced the world, commit acts that only “adults”—that is, in society, workplaces, and officialdom—would do? In fact, schools are not purely “knowledge-learning” sanctuaries free from the toxins of capitalism. On the contrary, they are places where the bourgeoisie “tames” children, adolescents, and young people before they formally enter capitalist society; they are prisons where bourgeois ideas such as laziness, “reading to become officials,” and “the strong prey on the weak” are instilled through brutal means—training obedient servants and future capitalists to serve their interests. As Lenin said, “The young generation of workers and peasants in such schools are not so much educated as they are enslaved by the bourgeoisie”[2]. Therefore, the hierarchical system and hierarchical consciousness, which are products of capitalist society, especially of the petty-bourgeois bureaucratic capitalism, naturally appear in schools. Besides the differences in status between teachers and students and the power teachers hold over students, there are also various internal class distinctions among students—such as family background, academic performance, and the closeness of relationships with teachers (often depending on how servile the student is). Moreover, to better “rule” students, schools and teachers adopt divide-and-conquer tactics based on student hierarchies, establishing “student organizations” such as student unions, empowering a few “upper-class” students with some teacher authority, allowing them to implement their will, and oppressing the rest—thus, student unions under capitalism are not organizations of “self-management,” “self-education,” or “self-service,” but agents of teacher oppression and student enslavement! Due to parasitic practices of dependency, the infusion of bourgeois ideas of doing less work for more pay and exploiting others, and the corruption prevalent among petty-bourgeois bureaucrats, these student officials abuse their limited power to extort money from other students. This constitutes the objective basis for the emergence of bribery and corruption among students in schools.

  After this incident was exposed, many media outlets either remained silent or published only vague official articles. Few media commented, and those that did mostly engaged in semantic disputes over “extortion” and “bribery and corruption” to distract attention; even fewer discussed the root causes of the incident, and most of these blamed individual teachers or schools for “dereliction of duty”—“Behind the ‘authoritative’ behavior of a few student officials is the lack of moral and legal education, huge loopholes, and negligence in school management”[3]. Indeed, the widespread moral decline among students is largely due to a lack of proper education, but it is precisely capitalism that causes this educational deficiency. Any attempt to deny the corrupt reality of capitalist society’s influence on the education system or to portray the widespread moral decay of youth as an “extraordinary phenomenon” is futile. The education system under petty-bourgeois reform is leading China’s young generation into a moral abyss, causing them to lose their vitality. However, the oppression of the capitalist education system, the spread of Marxism, and the development of people’s movements will gradually awaken their consciousness of resistance, ultimately uniting students with workers and peasants, sparking revolution in China. And “the Chinese revolution will wipe out the gloom on our youth and make them ‘the sun at 8 or 9 in the morning’ again!”[4]


  1. 安徽一小学副班长受贿2万多元,成最小贪官,内情引人深思!_澎湃号·媒体_澎湃新闻-The Paper ↩︎

  2. Lenin: “The Tasks of the Young Communist League.” ↩︎

  3. 马上评丨高中学生会干部“耍官威”为哪般_澎湃评论_澎湃新闻-The Paper ↩︎

  4. Flame: “The Road of China’s Future Revolution.” ↩︎

11 Likes

In school, they are the enforcers of the old nine, but in society, they become enforcers of the middle-repair government.

2 Likes

I remember an old joke online that goes like this: “Those classmates who used to bully others when we were young, after more than ten years, have all become auxiliary police or security guards in their local area.”

4 Likes

Generally, people with some moral bottom lines would not casually become police officers.

1 Like

I believe that the rights of these student leaders are granted by the school, and it can also be mentioned that their ability to collect this fee is because they can legally collect phones at school, supported by the school’s strict management and control system.

3 Likes

Ah, seeing this time period makes me think of when I was a student council president before, acting like a dog for the school, while I myself enjoyed that sense of authority and personal worship. Then I self-glorified, saying how I was for the people, and so on. Only later did I realize that these were the most虚的 (虚, meaning虚伪, hypocritical), and these positions in the student union were essentially just doing work for the school. The main conflict within the school is between teachers and students, so at this point, which side are you on? No matter how some people say they are unwilling or reluctant, they are still serving as dogs for the old nine, doing registrations, deducting points, and so on. How many people are enjoying this kind of official position and authority, becoming traitors among classmates, and striking hard at those around them?!

8 Likes