Commemorating the 55rd anniversary of the launch of Dongfanghong-1


On the evening of April 24, 1970, at 21:35, China’s first artificial satellite, Dongfanghong-1, was launched into space. Ten minutes later, the satellite successfully entered an elliptical orbit with a perigee of 439 kilometers and an apogee of 2,384 kilometers, and the Dongfanghong melody echoed through near-Earth space.
Although this achievement appears outdated compared to the technology fifty years later — the communication lines between the surveying stations were still open, the third stage of the rocket was a solid rocket engine that could not be precisely regulated, and the scientific equipment on the satellite was mainly a solar angle meter (used for technical verification) — for the then twenty-something, still in the stage of industrialization in socialist New China, this was a monumental achievement! In less than twenty years, from a poor and blank slate to an industrialized and electrified nation capable of producing rocket engines, manufacturing highly corrosive liquid rocket fuels, and building multiple observation stations on the borders of the motherland, it was an unprecedented monument, beyond doubt.
So, how did New China achieve this? It relied on Mao Zedong Thought and the proletarian revolutionary line, not on so-called “aerospace enthusiasts’ sentiments.” Launching a satellite is backed by a complete, organized industrial production and scientific research system. If the space program is compared to a fist, then the one wielding this fist is a healthy body, with nerves, muscles, and circulatory systems working in organized cooperation — not the fist itself! Although communication lines are open, they are carefully guarded by militia, and maintained meticulously by workers (out in the field!); although the satellite’s observation skirt looks simple, the polymers adapted to space environment are the research results of Shanghai Textile Factory; the instruments necessary for control and remote control were almost nonexistent in China before the Cultural Revolution (《自然辩证法》, 1976, Issue 3), but under the self-reliance line, rapid leaps were made… Launching a satellite is a collective achievement, and cooperation across various industries depends on workers taking the lead and integrating scientific researchers with frontline production, all of which is inseparable from the correct line.

Let us also look into the 《自然辩证法》 magazine to see how workers actively and creatively contributed at that time! The “Boiling Furnace” (《自然辩证法》, 1974, Issue 3) is a good example: in traditional thermal power plants, coal furnaces burned coal powder suspended in air. To ensure complete combustion, either increased wind power or extended furnace length was used to increase combustion time. Workers analyzed the movement of coal powder and believed that sufficient relative motion between the powder and air was necessary for full combustion, so they redesigned the furnace to allow coal powder to enter from above and air to flow in from below, moving towards each other. As a result, the coal powder moved up and down with the air in the furnace, boiling like a “boiling furnace.” This allowed the coal particles to fully contact oxygen and burn completely, and the quality requirements for coal (impurity content) were relaxed. Furthermore, workers redesigned the heat exchange device to prevent coking caused by excessively high furnace temperatures. Modern industry is a rigorous system combining breadth and depth; without political leadership, without Mao Zedong Thought guiding frontline workers, and without encouraging workers to innovate bravely, how could China’s industry grow so rapidly?
In the development of instruments, organic synthesis materials (1976, Issue 3), the combination of scientific researchers and workers was the fundamental source of scientific progress and understanding. In socialist countries, the doors to scientific exploration and technological innovation are open to all people, and the people gain knowledge and strength through scientific practice.
In contrast, imperialist scientific research and space systems have always been characterized by a divide between scientific researchers and workers. They fund bourgeois universities or research institutes with the labor of the masses but cultivate scientists into bourgeois intellectuals or worker aristocrat engineers. In an interview with an engineer involved in the Apollo program, the interviewee was selected in university to handle CNC work for the Saturn V rocket, later working as a technical elite in enterprises. Over 400,000 people were employed in the entire Apollo program[1], many of whom were university students pushed into the worker aristocrat class. Besides political propaganda, one function of imperialist space programs is to reproduce bourgeois and worker aristocrat classes internally.
Unfortunately, revisionism has also cast a shadow over China’s space industry. During the autumn recruitment season in aerospace departments, students found that companies and research institutes require overtime work; female students also face discrimination in this industry (“Should I switch to administrative work?”); recalling their master’s studies, they found the topics lacked meaning, were repetitive, and only taught some skills. Ultimately, they tried to comfort themselves with “space passion,” but had to sigh at “just trying to get by.” Even if they subjectively adopt a idealistic “passion” to comfort themselves, the objective petty-bourgeois situation causes sighs. Using the fist metaphor again, the “middle-class revisionist” fist, though swung more frequently, cannot hide its internal contradictions — a tumor called “private ownership” has spread throughout the body!
P.S. I planned to post on the 24th, but the draft was lost halfway… Also, welcome everyone’s criticism!

14 Likes

It reminds me of how fragmented I used to feel. One textbook states that the aerospace industry is a complex, systematic industry, while another textbook describes the Cultural Revolution as the “Ten Years of Chaos” and says the country was on the brink of collapse.

3 Likes

Absurd, how can a truly collapsing country produce highly toxic unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine-nitric acid fuel, and then meticulously complete the fueling? Let alone producing rocket engines—if you give it a rocket for free, it still can’t ignite it.
This really proves that when geometric axioms conflict with material interests, geometric axioms will also be declared wrong :joy:

3 Likes

Speaking of which, I really want to know the history of the factional struggles during the development of Dongfanghong-1. I had searched online before and found that the Chinese revisionists crazily glorify those who later became traitorous capitalist roaders. Zhou Enlai’s major role is almost throughout the entire story, and the names of capitalist roaders like Deng Xiaoping, Nie Rongzhen, and Qian Xuesen often appear (and they deliberately intersperse Chairman Mao’s speeches and activities to confuse right and wrong). It feels like there must have been intense class struggle. The successful launch of Dongfanghong-1 definitely could not have been achieved by the capitalist roaders. The Chinese revisionists must be using euphemistic language to deliberately portray black as white.

Baidu Encyclopedia has the following content:

In October 1957, Zhu Kezhen, Qian Xuesen, and Zhao Jiuzhang jointly submitted a letter to the central government, suggesting the development of China’s artificial satellite research [32] [43].
In January 1959, Deng Xiaoping instructed: “If the satellite is not launched in the next year or two, it will not match the national strength. The satellite project should continue, but be postponed a bit” [43].
On January 8, 1965, Qian Xuesen also wrote to Nie Rongzhen, director of the National Defense Science and Technology Commission, stating that conditions were already suitable to consider satellite development. In the first quarter of 1965, Zhou Enlai approved the Chinese Academy of Sciences to propose a specific plan (“651” was later designated as the satellite mission code) [6] [30].

The most explicit part is this:

In early 1967, facing the turmoil of the “Cultural Revolution” and its impact on satellite development, Premier Zhou Enlai and Vice Premier Nie Rongzhen took a series of measures, announcing that the “Four Greats” (big-character posters, big debates, big talks, and big releases) of the Cultural Revolution would not be carried out in satellite research units. They also selected elite personnel from many units, concentrated the dispersed research forces scattered across departments, implemented unified leadership, ensured normal scientific research and production, and guaranteed the timely launch of China’s first satellite [25]. Since artificial satellites are large-scale system engineering projects, given China’s actual national conditions, it was necessary to concentrate forces, form a fist, and make breakthroughs. Resolving the institutional issues of artificial satellite development became the main contradiction to solve. Qian Xuesen realized the necessity of establishing a specialized institution [33]. In May of the same year, Nie Rongzhen listened to Qian Xuesen’s report on establishing the “Institute of Artificial Satellites and Spaceships” and supported it [33].

Wikipedia also mentions:

Subsequently, from 1968 to 1969, a large number of scientists and intellectuals were persecuted during the political purges of the Cultural Revolution’s “class cleansing” [38][42][43]. In 1968, among missile and aerospace core experts, “Two Bombs, One Satellite” hero Zhao Jiuzhang was persecuted and committed suicide [11], and “Two Bombs, One Satellite” hero Yao Tongbin was beaten to death [44]; by the end of 1968, among over 170 senior researchers (all academicians) at the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing, 131 had been overthrown, and 20 first-level researchers committed suicide that year [39][40][45]. In March 1969, due to factional struggles in the Cultural Revolution, rocket test firing was delayed for more than 40 days [10]. In April, upon learning the news, Premier Zhou Enlai, who was presiding over the 9th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, repeatedly organized meetings with staff, calling on everyone to put aside factional differences for the country’s interests [10]. With Zhou Enlai’s vigorous promotion, the first-stage rocket ignition succeeded in May, the second-stage rocket ignition succeeded in June, but the conflicts between the two factions erupted again afterward, preventing the ignition of the third-stage rocket until Zhou Enlai intervened again in July [10].

1 Like

I couldn’t find sufficiently specific information to write about it; it would be great to have reliable and detailed historical data.

According to some comrades, there are some related details on Zhihu, compiled by some leftist circles, which can be looked at, but caution should be exercised in discerning them.

1 Like

When I had never been exposed to those graduate and doctoral students involved with the Nazis, I wasn’t clear about what exactly they did all day in the laboratory. Later, after learning more, I realized that their so-called research was even less meaningful than a child’s scientific fantasy. I once talked with a student who was about to pursue a doctoral degree. He shared with me the results of his research: soaking a thin film of unknown material in alcohol, then putting it back into water, where it would move irregularly (at least they didn’t know what the pattern was). I asked him what this could be used for, and he vaguely said it could be made into a robot or perhaps play a role in some future surgery. I asked him if they had any purpose when they started the research. He said no. Finally, I asked what their research direction was. He said the advisor just casually mentioned a rough idea of what this thing could be used for, then they started looking up information and trying things themselves.
This shows the decadence and reactionary nature of scientific research under imperialism. Those working in chemical engineering do not integrate with factories and workers; their research lacks direction and meaning, and is only meant to use so-called scientific achievements as a gimmick to swindle funds and degrees.

7 Likes