In the eyes of Weimingzi, the winner is right and the loser is wrong, regardless of ideology. Even if capitalists restore the monarchy, as long as the rebellion succeeds, it is correct; if the proletariat’s revolutionary struggle fails, it is counter-revolutionary. He also supports this fascist educational system of exam-oriented education, turning the brainwashing and exploitation of intellectual property by the bourgeois educational groups over proletariat students into a spontaneous struggle by the proletariat students, promoting the bourgeoisie’s anti-revolutionary theory that the proletariat should voluntarily be exploited. Weimingzi also slanders revolutionary martyrs with petty bourgeoisie accusations, using works that control spiritual means of production for his own benefit as a bible, criticizing true Maoists.
We must thoroughly see through Weimingzi’s true face, expel him from the ranks of the left, and thoroughly criticize and condemn him and his reactionary, counter-revolutionary ideas. Long live the invincible Mao Zedong Thought!
Weiming Zi claims to be an informant for the Suzhou national security, specifically assisting them in arresting “anti-party and anti-state destabilizers.” What else is there to say? Weiming Zi has long publicly stood on the side of the Chinese reformists, and this has been well known for a long time. I don’t think even the leftist circle would consider Weiming Zi as a “leftist” anymore. What you posted has no value. Moreover, if you want to see the true face of Weiming Zi, the article lacks content and doesn’t address the key issues, so it’s not meaningful.
I think big-character posters just need to highlight the center, these are his recent counter-revolutionary statements, so naturally they are criticized.
The big-character poster is meant for others to see. If it has no content and cannot serve as propaganda for the masses, then it has no real meaning.
To be honest, your title caught my attention, and I was looking forward to an article that analyzes and criticizes VMZ, because this person has too many rebellious and reactionary deeds, and often does live broadcasts and screen recordings, which makes it hard to understand many of the things he does.
However, this is not a complete article and does not analyze anything in detail, so reading it doesn’t improve understanding. Therefore, many parts are unclear, such as him claiming that the bourgeois education group’s brainwashing of students is a struggle of the proletarian students—how can one-sided brainwashing be called a struggle? This makes it hard to understand what VMZ is really doing. Also, since intellectual property is not a person, I don’t understand what he means by the bourgeoisie ‘exploiting’ intellectual property. The specific revolutionary martyrs’ works that petty bourgeoisie slander are not mentioned; based on your picture, I guess it’s the short play “On the Long March”. The quality of this picture itself is not high; the yellow font is hard to distinguish from some white background areas. When I viewed it on my phone, I couldn’t see clearly.
I’ve already written a quarter in detail. Let’s consider this a preview anyway, since the content is not limited to these three things. If there’s anything you’re unclear about, I will also clarify it. I can finish writing it by Sunday at the latest.
The content is too little, I hope the author can write more content
First post, please forgive me
Actually, there’s no need to rush and write an article. You can check out the association’s recommended readings, many of which can help you clarify the scientific concepts of Marxism, thereby enabling you to analyze and critique with a Marxist perspective. Otherwise, merely listing phenomena without analyzing their essence makes it difficult to improve oneself and for others to understand these people and things.
To be honest, the post you sent is meaningless and cannot criticize Weimingzi at all; it is just hollow slogans using revolutionary phrases to decorate the surface. In fact, you have not provided specific analysis for each point you mentioned, but are merely making a loud fuss. Chairman Mao said that specific analysis is the living soul of Marxism. You have added so many accusations against Weimingzi without analysis, but without analysis, isn’t that turning Marxism into a hollow and tasteless dogma?
Agreed, posting big-character posters is good, but the content must not be empty words, only slogans, otherwise posting them would be meaningless.
If one claims to uphold Marxism but the article is very lacking in content and hollow, it will only damage the reputation of Marxism. Such empty titles and contentless things are unacceptable.
The complete version has been sent already, I don’t know if you can see it.
Did you send it? I didn’t see it, that’s strange.
I don’t know, but it shows that I sent it here, and someone saw it.